REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FPI vs LAND vs AGM vs AFCG vs AMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
Financial - Credit Services
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
FPI vs LAND vs AGM vs AFCG vs AMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Industrial | Financial - Credit Services | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $462M | $354M | $1.99B | $73M | $83.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $76M | $1.32B | $6M | $10.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $-10M | $210M | $-20M | $2.88B |
| Gross Margin | 78.7% | 87.4% | 29.5% | -76.6% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | 45.6% | 78.6% | 19.4% | -124.7% | 44.2% |
| Forward P/E | 49.6x | — | 9.7x | — | 27.4x |
| Total Debt | $161M | $0.00 | $30.82B | $76M | $44.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $27M | $931M | $39M | $1.47B |
FPI vs LAND vs AGM vs AFCG vs AMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmland Partners I… (FPI) | 100 | 94.4 | -5.6% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 53.3 | -46.7% |
| Federal Agricultura… (AGM) | 100 | 181.5 | +81.5% |
| Advanced Flower Cap… (AFCG) | 100 | 21.5 | -78.5% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 75.1 | -24.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FPI vs LAND vs AGM vs AFCG vs AMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FPI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 11.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 537.08x
- Beta 0.56, yield 11.7%, current ratio 537.08x
- 56.0% margin vs AFCG's -333.9%
LAND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +11.2% vs AFCG's -35.5%
AGM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 423.4% 10Y total return vs AMT's 113.8%
- PEG 0.65 vs AMT's 3.76
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 27.4x), PEG 0.65 vs 3.76
AFCG is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 28.1% yield, vs AGM's 4.4%
AMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs AFCG's -39.6%
- 4.5% ROA vs AFCG's -6.4%, ROIC 6.9% vs -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs AFCG's -39.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 27.4x), PEG 0.65 vs 3.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.0% margin vs AFCG's -333.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs AFCG's 1.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 28.1% yield, vs AGM's 4.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.2% vs AFCG's -35.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs AFCG's -6.4%, ROIC 6.9% vs -4.1% |
FPI vs LAND vs AGM vs AFCG vs AMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FPI vs LAND vs AGM vs AFCG vs AMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGM leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMT leads 1 • FPI leads 0 • LAND leads 0 • AFCG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FPI and LAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 1814.3x AFCG's $6M. FPI is the more profitable business, keeping 56.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFCG's -3.3%. On growth, AFCG holds the edge at +64.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $76M | $1.3B | $6M | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $94M | $193M | -$16M | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | -$10M | $210M | -$20M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $5M | $222M | -$24M | $3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.7% | +87.4% | +29.5% | -76.6% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +78.6% | +19.4% | -124.7% | +44.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | -13.8% | +15.7% | -3.3% | +26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +6.2% | +6.1% | -3.9% | +34.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.5% | +38.6% | — | +64.7% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.2% | +66.7% | 0.0% | +16.7% | +76.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AGM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, AGM trades at a 67% valuation discount to AMT's 33.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AGM offers better value at 0.73x vs AMT's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $462M | $354M | $2.0B | $73M | $83.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $614M | $327M | $31.9B | $110M | $127.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.07x | -33.62x | 11.00x | -3.25x | 33.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.62x | — | 9.68x | — | 27.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.73x | — | 4.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.54x | 3.46x | 124.68x | — | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.85x | 4.65x | 1.51x | 2.32x | 7.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 0.53x | 1.17x | 0.39x | 8.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.50x | 50.62x | 24.88x | 6.47x | 22.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-11 for AFCG. FPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGM's 17.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | -1.6% | +12.6% | -11.1% | +27.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | -0.8% | +0.6% | -6.4% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +4.9% | +0.6% | -4.1% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +4.7% | +1.1% | -5.6% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | — | 17.93x | 0.43x | 4.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $152M | -$27M | $29.9B | $38M | $43.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $27M | $931M | $39M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $161M | $0 | $30.8B | $76M | $45.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.34x | 2.99x | 0.17x | -2.15x | 3.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGM five years ago would be worth $20,219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,539 for AFCG. Over the past 12 months, LAND leads with a +11.2% total return vs AFCG's -35.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGM at 15.3% vs LAND's -10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.0% | +8.8% | +4.5% | +10.2% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | +11.2% | +8.2% | -35.5% | -15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.0% | -27.5% | +53.2% | -20.1% | +3.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | -43.8% | +102.2% | -44.6% | -14.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.7% | +42.9% | +423.4% | -42.4% | +113.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | -10.2% | +15.3% | -7.2% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AGM and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFCG's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AGM currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs AFCG's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.68x | 0.76x | 1.86x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.23 | $13.00 | $210.64 | $5.87 | $234.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.37 | $8.47 | $136.57 | $2.06 | $165.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.0% | +75.0% | +86.8% | +52.6% | +76.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.1 | 41.0 | 68.1 | 48.2 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 394K | 543K | 102K | 235K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AGM and AFCG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FPI as "Hold", LAND as "Buy", AGM as "Buy", AMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.6% upside for FPI (target: $17) vs 2.6% for LAND (target: $10). For income investors, AFCG offers the higher dividend yield at 28.10% vs AMT's 3.75%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $10.00 | $233.00 | — | $216.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 11 | 5 | — | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.7% | +6.7% | +4.4% | +28.1% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $0.66 | $8.11 | $0.87 | $6.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
AGM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). AMT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FPI vs LAND vs AGM vs AFCG vs AMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT?
On trailing P/E, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the cheapest at 11.
0x versus American Tower Corporation at 33. 3x. On forward P/E, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation wins at 0. 65x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT?
Over the past 5 years, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) delivered a total return of +102.
2%, compared to -44. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGM returned +423. 4% versus AFCG's -42. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Advanced Flower Capital Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning AFCG is approximately -5050% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 18% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -39. 6% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Tower Corporation grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -218. 8% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMT leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT?
Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 5% net margin versus -66. 0% for Advanced Flower Capital Inc. — meaning it keeps 60. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus -43. 6% for AFCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AFCG leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 65x versus American Tower Corporation's 3. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 49. 6x for Farmland Partners Inc. — 39. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FPI: 60. 6% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) offers the highest yield at 28. 1%, versus 3. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT).
09Is FPI or LAND or AGM or AFCG or AMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +113. 8% 10Y return). Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 8%, AFCG: -42. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FPI and LAND and AGM and AFCG and AMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (FPI (Real Estate) and LAND (Real Estate) and AGM (Financial Services) and AFCG (Real Estate) and AMT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AGM is a small-cap deep-value stock; AFCG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.