REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FPI vs LAND vs ILPT vs AMT vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Industrial
FPI vs LAND vs ILPT vs AMT vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $462M | $354M | $527M | $83.69B | $132.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $76M | $453M | $10.82B | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $30M | $-10M | $-54M | $2.88B | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | 78.7% | 87.4% | 10.9% | 73.4% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 45.6% | 78.6% | 33.1% | 44.2% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | 49.6x | — | — | 27.4x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $161M | $0.00 | $4.22B | $44.96B | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $27M | $183M | $1.47B | $1.32B |
FPI vs LAND vs ILPT vs AMT vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmland Partners I… (FPI) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
| Industrial Logistic… (ILPT) | 100 | 42.2 | -57.8% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 155.5 | +55.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FPI vs LAND vs ILPT vs AMT vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FPI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 11.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 537.08x
- Beta 0.56, yield 11.7%, current ratio 537.08x
- 56.0% margin vs LAND's -13.8%
LAND lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ILPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +177.7% vs AMT's -15.0%
AMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 3.76 vs PLD's 3.83
- 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7%
- Lower P/E (27.4x vs 41.4x), PEG 3.76 vs 3.83
- 4.5% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 6.9% vs 2.2%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.9%
- 259.1% 10Y total return vs AMT's 113.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.4x vs 41.4x), PEG 3.76 vs 3.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.0% margin vs LAND's -13.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs ILPT's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.7% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AMT's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +177.7% vs AMT's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 6.9% vs 2.2% |
FPI vs LAND vs ILPT vs AMT vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FPI vs LAND vs ILPT vs AMT vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAND leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMT leads 1 • ILPT leads 1 • FPI leads 0 • PLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 201.0x FPI's $54M. FPI is the more profitable business, keeping 56.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LAND's -13.8%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $76M | $453M | $10.8B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $94M | $306M | $6.9B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $30M | -$10M | -$54M | $2.9B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $5M | $65M | $3.8B | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.7% | +87.4% | +10.9% | +73.4% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +78.6% | +33.1% | +44.2% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +56.0% | -13.8% | -11.9% | +26.6% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +6.2% | +14.4% | +34.9% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.5% | +38.6% | +4.0% | +6.8% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.2% | +66.7% | +57.6% | +76.9% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LAND leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, FPI trades at a 52% valuation discount to PLD's 35.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.28x vs AMT's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $462M | $354M | $527M | $83.7B | $132.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $614M | $327M | $4.6B | $127.2B | $162.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.07x | -33.62x | -7.91x | 33.33x | 35.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.62x | — | — | 27.41x | 41.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.57x | 3.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.54x | 3.46x | 14.59x | 18.32x | 23.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.85x | 4.65x | 1.17x | 7.86x | 16.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.01x | 0.53x | 0.58x | 8.14x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.50x | 50.62x | 8.69x | 22.12x | 26.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ILPT. FPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILPT's 4.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | -1.6% | -5.9% | +27.4% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | -0.8% | -1.0% | +4.5% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +4.9% | +2.2% | +6.9% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +4.7% | +3.3% | +8.6% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | — | 4.69x | 4.34x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $152M | -$27M | $4.0B | $43.5B | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $27M | $183M | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $161M | $0 | $4.2B | $45.0B | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.34x | 2.99x | 0.61x | 3.99x | 5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLD five years ago would be worth $13,773 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,803 for ILPT. Over the past 12 months, ILPT leads with a +177.7% total return vs AMT's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILPT at 62.2% vs LAND's -10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.0% | +8.8% | +44.8% | +3.8% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.3% | +11.2% | +177.7% | -15.0% | +39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.0% | -27.5% | +326.6% | +3.3% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.7% | -43.8% | -62.0% | -14.7% | +37.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.7% | +42.9% | -41.0% | +113.8% | +259.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | -10.2% | +62.2% | +1.1% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMT and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILPT's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PLD currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs LAND's 75.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.68x | 1.62x | -0.04x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.23 | $13.00 | $8.19 | $234.33 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.37 | $8.47 | $2.84 | $165.08 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.0% | +75.0% | +96.6% | +76.7% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.1 | 41.0 | 71.4 | 52.4 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 394K | 543K | 312K | 2.8M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FPI and AMT and PLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FPI as "Hold", LAND as "Buy", ILPT as "Buy", AMT as "Buy", PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.6% upside for FPI (target: $17) vs -6.4% for ILPT (target: $7). For income investors, FPI offers the higher dividend yield at 11.75% vs ILPT's 1.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $10.00 | $7.40 | $216.33 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 11 | 9 | 49 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.7% | +6.7% | +1.5% | +3.7% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $0.66 | $0.12 | $6.73 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.3% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +0.0% |
LAND leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FPI vs LAND vs ILPT vs AMT vs PLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (49. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD?
On trailing P/E, Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Prologis, Inc. at 35. 5x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Tower Corporation wins at 3. 76x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 83x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) delivered a total return of +37. 7%, compared to -62. 0% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +259. 1% versus ILPT's -41. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's 1. 62β — meaning ILPT is approximately -4413% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Industrial Logistics Properties Trust grew EPS 31. 5% year-over-year, compared to -41. 5% for Farmland Partners Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD?
Farmland Partners Inc.
(FPI) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 5% net margin versus -14. 7% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — meaning it keeps 60. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus 33. 0% for ILPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAND leads at 87. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 76x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 83x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 4x forward P/E versus 49. 6x for Farmland Partners Inc. — 22. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FPI: 60. 6% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Farmland Partners Inc. (FPI) offers the highest yield at 11. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT).
09Is FPI or LAND or ILPT or AMT or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +113. 8% 10Y return). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 8%, ILPT: -41. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FPI and LAND and ILPT and AMT and PLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FPI is a small-cap deep-value stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ILPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.