Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FRAF vs MNSB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FRAF
Franklin Financial Services Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$259M
5Y Perf.+130.3%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$176M
5Y Perf.+77.2%

FRAF vs MNSB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FRAF logoFRAF
MNSB logoMNSB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$259M$176M
Revenue (TTM)$134M$136M
Net Income (TTM)$21M$16M
Gross Margin64.3%54.4%
Operating Margin19.7%14.0%
Forward P/E9.9x10.4x
Total Debt$215M$70M
Cash & Equiv.$22M$25M

FRAF vs MNSBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FRAF
MNSB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Franklin Financial … (FRAF)100230.3+130.3%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100177.2+77.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FRAF vs MNSB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FRAF leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FRAF
Franklin Financial Services Corporation
The Banking Pick

FRAF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 2.3%
  • Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 88.8%
  • 195.2% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 126.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.1% vs FRAF's 3.1%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRAF's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRAF's 0.4%
Best for: bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFRAF logoFRAF17.3% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueFRAF logoFRAFLower P/E (9.9x vs 10.4x)
Quality / MarginsMNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRAF's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyFRAF logoFRAFBeta 0.58 vs MNSB's 0.66
DividendsFRAF logoFRAF2.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FRAF logoFRAF+52.8% vs MNSB's +26.4%
Efficiency (ROA)MNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRAF's 0.4%

FRAF vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FRAFFranklin Financial Services Corporation
FY 2025
Asset Management Fees
91.8%$8M
Estate Management Services Fees
5.0%$458,000
Commision
3.2%$291,000
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M

FRAF vs MNSB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFRAFLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FRAF leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

MNSB and FRAF operate at a comparable scale, with $136M and $134M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.9% (FRAF) to 11.5% (MNSB).

MetricFRAF logoFRAFFranklin Financia…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$134M$136M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$28M$23M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$21M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$25M$13M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.3%+54.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.7%+14.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.9%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.4%+7.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.3%+120.9%
FRAF leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FRAF and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, FRAF trades at a 9% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSB's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRAF's 17.2x.

MetricFRAF logoFRAFFranklin Financia…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Market CapShares × price$259M$176M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$451M$221M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.15x13.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.87x10.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.16x11.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.94x1.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.48x0.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.52x16.57x
Evenly matched — FRAF and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FRAF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FRAF delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRAF's 1.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRAF scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFRAF logoFRAFFranklin Financia…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.1%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.2%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.23x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$192M$45M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$22M$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$215M$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.59x0.31x
FRAF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FRAF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FRAF five years ago would be worth $21,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,056 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, FRAF leads with a +52.8% total return vs MNSB's +26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRAF at 35.5% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFRAF logoFRAFFranklin Financia…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.0%+19.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+52.8%+26.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+148.9%+21.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+115.2%+20.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+195.2%+126.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+35.5%+6.7%
FRAF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FRAF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FRAF is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricFRAF logoFRAFFranklin Financia…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.58x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$60.00$25.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$33.44$17.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.0%+93.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.750.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded31K58K
FRAF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

FRAF is the only dividend payer here at 2.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFRAF logoFRAFFranklin Financia…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts1
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%0.0%
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FRAF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNSB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallFranklin Financial Services… (FRAF)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FRAF vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FRAF or MNSB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the stronger pick with 17.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FRAF or MNSB?

On trailing P/E, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Franklin Financial Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FRAF or MNSB?

Over the past 5 years, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) delivered a total return of +115.

2%, compared to +20. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRAF returned +195. 2% versus MNSB's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FRAF or MNSB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

58β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning MNSB is approximately 14% more volatile than FRAF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 123% for Franklin Financial Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FRAF or MNSB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is pulling ahead at 17.

3% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 88. 8% for Franklin Financial Services Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FRAF or MNSB?

Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

9% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRAF leads at 19. 7% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRAF leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FRAF or MNSB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) trades at 9.

9x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FRAF or MNSB?

In this comparison, FRAF (2.

3% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FRAF or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

58), 2. 3% yield, +195. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRAF: +195. 2%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FRAF and MNSB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FRAF is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FRAF pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FRAF

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNSB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FRAF and MNSB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FRAF: 17.3% · MNSB: -1.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(FRAF: 15.9% · MNSB: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FRAF: 12.1x · MNSB: 13.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.