Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FRAF vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FRAF vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $259M | $176M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $134M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 64.3% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.9x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $215M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $25M |
FRAF vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin Financial … (FRAF) | 100 | 230.3 | +130.3% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FRAF vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FRAF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 88.8%
- 195.2% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 126.9%
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs FRAF's 3.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRAF's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRAF's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRAF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs MNSB's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs MNSB's +26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FRAF's 0.4% |
FRAF vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FRAF vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRAF leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB and FRAF operate at a comparable scale, with $136M and $134M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.9% (FRAF) to 11.5% (MNSB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $134M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.3% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FRAF and MNSB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, FRAF trades at a 9% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSB's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRAF's 17.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $259M | $176M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $451M | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.15x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.87x | 10.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.20x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.16x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.94x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.52x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FRAF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRAF delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRAF's 1.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRAF scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.1% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.23x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $192M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $215M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.59x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRAF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FRAF five years ago would be worth $21,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,056 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, FRAF leads with a +52.8% total return vs MNSB's +26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRAF at 35.5% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.0% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.8% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.9% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +115.2% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +195.2% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.5% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FRAF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FRAF is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $60.00 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.44 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 58K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
FRAF is the only dividend payer here at 2.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
FRAF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNSB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FRAF vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FRAF or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the stronger pick with 17.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FRAF or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, Franklin Financial Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FRAF or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) delivered a total return of +115.
2%, compared to +20. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRAF returned +195. 2% versus MNSB's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FRAF or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
58β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning MNSB is approximately 14% more volatile than FRAF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 123% for Franklin Financial Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FRAF or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is pulling ahead at 17.
3% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 88. 8% for Franklin Financial Services Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FRAF or MNSB?
Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FRAF leads at 19. 7% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRAF leads at 64. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FRAF or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) trades at 9.
9x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FRAF or MNSB?
In this comparison, FRAF (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FRAF or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
58), 2. 3% yield, +195. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FRAF: +195. 2%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FRAF and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FRAF is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FRAF pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.