FRHC vs MKTX vs IBKR vs ICE vs CBOE

For growth investors, Freedom Holding Corp.

(FRHC) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, MarketAxess Holdings Inc.

(MKTX) is the cheapest at 22. 2x versus Freedom Holding Corp. at 99. 9x. On forward P/E, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. wins at 1. 14x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.

(IBKR) delivered a total return of +402. 3%, compared to -63. 2% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRHC returned +71. 1% versus MKTX's +34. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MarketAxess Holdings Inc.

(MKTX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. 's 1. 93β — meaning IBKR is approximately -692% more volatile than MKTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 161% for Freedom Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Freedom Holding Corp.

(FRHC) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus 3. 8% for MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cboe Global Markets, Inc. grew EPS 44. 5% year-over-year, compared to -77. 9% for Freedom Holding Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MarketAxess Holdings Inc.

(MKTX) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus 4. 2% for Freedom Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus 31. 1% for FRHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBKR leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 14x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (MKTX) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MKTX: 32. 6% to $195. 60.

In this comparison, MKTX (2.

1% yield), ICE (1. 2% yield), CBOE (0. 8% yield), IBKR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. FRHC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.

(CBOE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 0. 8% yield, +478. 6% 10Y return). Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBOE: +478. 6%, IBKR: +831. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FRHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CBOE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. MKTX, ICE, CBOE pay a dividend while FRHC, IBKR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.