Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FROG vs GTLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
FROG vs GTLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $6.52B | $4.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $532M | $957M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-72M | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 76.7% | 87.5% |
| Operating Margin | -17.7% | -12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 59.9x | 30.2x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $230M |
FROG vs GTLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JFrog Ltd. (FROG) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
| GitLab Inc. (GTLB) | 100 | 21.6 | -78.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FROG vs GTLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FROG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -16.9% 10Y total return vs GTLB's -76.6%
- +56.5% vs GTLB's -47.8%
GTLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.21
- Rev growth 26.0%, EPS growth -7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 2.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.0% revenue growth vs FROG's 24.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.2x vs 59.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.8% margin vs FROG's -13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs FROG's 1.24 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.5% vs GTLB's -47.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.6% ROA vs FROG's -5.8%, ROIC -12.5% vs -8.0% |
FROG vs GTLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FROG vs GTLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FROG and GTLB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $957M annually — 1.8x FROG's $532M. GTLB is the more profitable business, keeping -5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FROG's -13.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $532M | $957M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$69M | -$104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$72M | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $142M | $222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.7% | +87.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.7% | -12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.2% | +23.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.1% | -133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GTLB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.5B | $4.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.5B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -86.79x | -69.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 59.88x | 30.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.26x | 4.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.05x | 3.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.82x | 18.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTLB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTLB delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-9 for FROG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FROG scores 6/9 vs GTLB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.5% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.8% | -3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.0% | -12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.6% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$57M | -$230M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $230M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FROG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FROG five years ago would be worth $12,797 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,338 for GTLB. Over the past 12 months, FROG leads with a +56.5% total return vs GTLB's -47.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FROG at 35.8% vs GTLB's -7.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.7% | -32.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.5% | -47.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.6% | -19.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.0% | -76.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.9% | -76.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.8% | -7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FROG and GTLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLB is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FROG's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FROG currently trades 76.4% from its 52-week high vs GTLB's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.43 | $54.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.33 | $18.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FROG as "Buy" and GTLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for GTLB (target: $36) vs 27.7% for FROG (target: $69).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.71 | $36.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
GTLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FROG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FROG vs GTLB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FROG or GTLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) is the stronger pick with 26. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 1% for JFrog Ltd. (FROG). Analysts rate JFrog Ltd. (FROG) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FROG or GTLB?
Over the past 5 years, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) delivered a total return of +28. 0%, compared to -76. 6% for GitLab Inc. (GTLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FROG returned -16. 9% versus GTLB's -76. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FROG or GTLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus JFrog Ltd. 's 1. 24β — meaning FROG is approximately 2% more volatile than GTLB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FROG or GTLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) is pulling ahead at 26. 0% versus 24. 1% for JFrog Ltd. (FROG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JFrog Ltd. grew EPS 1. 6% year-over-year, compared to -775. 0% for GitLab Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLB leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FROG or GTLB?
GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 8% net margin versus -13. 5% for JFrog Ltd. — meaning it keeps -5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLB leads at -12. 2% versus -15. 7% for FROG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLB leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FROG or GTLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) trades at 30. 2x forward P/E versus 59. 9x for JFrog Ltd. — 29. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTLB: 48. 7% to $36. 13.
07Which pays a better dividend — FROG or GTLB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FROG or GTLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JFrog Ltd.
(FROG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FROG: -16. 9%, GTLB: -76. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FROG and GTLB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.