FROG vs TEAM vs HUBS vs GTLB

For growth investors, GitLab Inc.

(GTLB) is the stronger pick with 26. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 2% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) offers the better valuation at 284. 1x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JFrog Ltd. (FROG) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Atlassian Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.

4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, JFrog Ltd.

(FROG) delivered a total return of +58. 8%, compared to -75. 1% for GitLab Inc. (GTLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBS returned +469. 1% versus GTLB's -75. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

98β versus JFrog Ltd. 's 1. 24β — meaning FROG is approximately 27% more volatile than TEAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JFrog Ltd. (FROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 92% for Atlassian Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), GitLab Inc.

(GTLB) is pulling ahead at 26. 0% versus 19. 2% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -775. 0% for GitLab Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLB leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

HubSpot, Inc.

(HUBS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -13. 5% for JFrog Ltd. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBS leads at 0. 4% versus -15. 7% for FROG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLB leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) trades at 19.

4x forward P/E versus 63. 4x for JFrog Ltd. — 44. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEAM: 49. 2% to $137. 79.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

98), +338. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEAM: +338. 0%, GTLB: -75. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.