Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FSI vs HNNA vs PESI vs GROW vs DHIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Waste Management
Asset Management - Global
Asset Management
FSI vs HNNA vs PESI vs GROW vs DHIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Asset Management | Waste Management | Asset Management - Global | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $78M | $81M | $204M | $35M | $473M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $36M | $59M | $8M | $158M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $8M | $-18M | $98K | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 70.1% | 4.1% | 41.7% | 96.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.0% | 37.0% | -26.3% | -35.3% | 38.4% |
| Forward P/E | 25.5x | 8.1x | — | — | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $41M | $4M | $83K | $6.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $72M | $12M | $25M | $42M |
FSI vs HNNA vs PESI vs GROW vs DHIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexible Solutions … (FSI) | 100 | 368.7 | +268.7% |
| Hennessy Advisors, … (HNNA) | 100 | 128.3 | +28.3% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 196.8 | +96.8% |
| U.S. Global Investo… (GROW) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
| Diamond Hill Invest… (DHIL) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSI vs HNNA vs PESI vs GROW vs DHIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 390.3% 10Y total return vs PESI's 174.4%
- +58.3% vs HNNA's -3.8%
HNNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 5.2%
- Rev growth 19.9%, EPS growth 38.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 41.4%, current ratio 12.72x
- NIM 1.7% vs DHIL's 0.7%
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, GROW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DHIL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 1.14 vs FSI's 3.02
- Beta 0.57, yield 5.7%, current ratio 75115.85x
- 30.9% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
- 5.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GROW's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% NII/revenue growth vs GROW's -23.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs PESI's 1.74 | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GROW's 3.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.3% vs HNNA's -3.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 1.3% vs -21.7% |
FSI vs HNNA vs PESI vs GROW vs DHIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FSI vs HNNA vs PESI vs GROW vs DHIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories
FSI leads 1 • HNNA leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • GROW leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHIL is the larger business by revenue, generating $158M annually — 18.7x GROW's $8M. DHIL is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, FSI holds the edge at +13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $36M | $59M | $8M | $158M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $11M | -$14M | -$2M | $62M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $8M | -$18M | $98,000 | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $10M | -$13M | -$235,000 | $44.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +70.1% | +4.1% | +41.7% | +96.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +37.0% | -26.3% | -35.3% | +38.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +28.0% | -30.1% | -4.0% | +30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +37.6% | -22.0% | -9.8% | -57.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.3% | — | -20.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +86.7% | -27.3% | -110.5% | — | +25.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HNNA and GROW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, HNNA trades at a 68% valuation discount to FSI's 25.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DHIL offers better value at 1.18x vs FSI's 3.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $78M | $81M | $204M | $35M | $473M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $81M | $49M | $197M | $10M | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.50x | 8.08x | -14.67x | -104.80x | 9.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 9.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.02x | 2.19x | — | — | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.79x | 3.66x | — | — | 110.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 2.28x | 3.31x | 4.14x | 3.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.88x | 0.82x | 4.05x | 0.77x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 128.67x | 6.07x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GROW and DHIL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHIL delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. GROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHIL's 36.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HNNA scores 7/9 vs GROW's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +8.5% | -34.5% | +0.2% | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +5.3% | -20.2% | +0.2% | +19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +7.3% | -21.7% | -4.7% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | +8.7% | -16.7% | -6.2% | +26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.41x | 0.09x | 0.00x | 36.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$32M | -$7M | -$24M | $6.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $72M | $12M | $25M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $41M | $4M | $83,000 | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.64x | 10.15x | -42.14x | 600.00x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSI five years ago would be worth $20,615 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,489 for GROW. Over the past 12 months, FSI leads with a +58.3% total return vs HNNA's -3.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSI at 30.7% vs GROW's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | +8.0% | -10.2% | +7.7% | +2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.3% | -3.8% | +15.8% | +24.3% | +31.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.3% | +67.7% | +19.8% | +3.3% | +22.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.1% | +39.6% | +46.7% | -55.1% | +30.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +390.3% | -34.7% | +174.4% | +67.4% | +55.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +18.8% | +6.2% | +1.1% | +7.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HNNA and DHIL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HNNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DHIL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FSI's 53.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.27x | 1.74x | 0.70x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.48 | $13.19 | $16.50 | $3.65 | $175.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.64 | $8.90 | $8.02 | $2.12 | $114.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.3% | +77.8% | +66.7% | +71.8% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 61.5 | 35.7 | 46.5 | 70.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 9K | 164K | 24K | 22K |
Analyst Outlook
DHIL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, DHIL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.71% vs FSI's 1.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +5.2% | — | +3.5% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $0.54 | — | $0.09 | $9.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +5.6% | +3.6% |
DHIL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). FSI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FSI vs HNNA vs PESI vs GROW vs DHIL: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSI or HNNA or PESI or GROW or DHIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger pick with 19. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSI or HNNA or PESI or GROW or DHIL?
On trailing P/E, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Flexible Solutions International, Inc. at 25. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSI or HNNA or PESI or GROW or DHIL?
Over the past 5 years, Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(FSI) delivered a total return of +106. 1%, compared to -55. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSI returned +390. 3% versus HNNA's -34. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSI or HNNA or PESI or GROW or DHIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning PESI is approximately 545% more volatile than HNNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSI or HNNA or PESI or GROW or DHIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is pulling ahead at 19. 9% versus -23. 1% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -126. 6% for U. S. Global Investors, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSI leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSI or HNNA or PESI or GROW or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(DHIL) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHIL leads at 38. 4% versus -35. 3% for GROW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHIL leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FSI or HNNA or PESI or GROW or DHIL?
In this comparison, DHIL (5.
7% yield), HNNA (5. 2% yield), GROW (3. 5% yield), FSI (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PESI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FSI or HNNA or PESI or GROW or DHIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 5. 2% yield). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNNA: -34. 7%, PESI: +174. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FSI and HNNA and PESI and GROW and DHIL?
These companies operate in different sectors (FSI (Basic Materials) and HNNA (Financial Services) and PESI (Industrials) and GROW (Financial Services) and DHIL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HNNA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GROW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DHIL is a small-cap deep-value stock. FSI, HNNA, GROW, DHIL pay a dividend while PESI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.