Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Software - Infrastructure
Banks - Regional
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Banks - Regional | Software - Infrastructure | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.05B | $7.58B | $90.83B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $653M | $2.85B | $2.33B | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $624M | $-87M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 58.7% | 49.1% | 73.5% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | 20.4% | -9.1% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 73.1x | 9.6x | 228.9x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $430M | $2.53B | $3.70B | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $3.34B | $944M | $380M |
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
| Pinnacle Financial … (PNFP) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) | 100 | 884.2 | +784.2% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 46.3%, current ratio 2.61x
- Beta 0.95 vs NET's 1.53, lower leverage
- +223.4% vs PNFP's -4.3%
PNFP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 228.9x)
- 16.6% margin vs SFNC's -63.4%
- 1.1% ROA vs FSLY's -6.9%, ROIC 4.9% vs -7.8%
NET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.5%
- 13.3% 10Y total return vs PNFP's 125.4%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 4.0%
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- NIM 2.9% vs PNFP's 2.6%
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs PNFP's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 228.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.6% margin vs SFNC's -63.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs NET's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs PNFP's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +223.4% vs PNFP's -4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs FSLY's -6.9%, ROIC 4.9% vs -7.8% |
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PNFP leads in 2 of 6 categories
NET leads 1 • SFNC leads 1 • FSLY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PNFP and NET each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNFP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 4.6x SFNC's $627M. PNFP is the more profitable business, keeping 16.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%. On growth, NET holds the edge at +33.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $653M | $2.9B | $2.3B | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $841M | $67M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $624M | -$87M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $59M | $1.1B | $365M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.7% | +49.1% | +73.5% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | +20.4% | -9.1% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +16.6% | -3.7% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +28.3% | +15.7% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.8% | — | +33.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.9% | +17.7% | +36.4% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PNFP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PNFP's 10.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NET's 1062.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $7.6B | $90.8B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $6.8B | $93.6B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.49x | 16.55x | -886.38x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 73.12x | 9.65x | 228.90x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.16x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.96x | 1062.71x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.89x | 2.66x | 41.90x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.08x | 1.18x | 61.38x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.38x | 9.39x | 280.08x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNFP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PNFP delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NET's 2.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNFP scores 6/9 vs NET's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.9% | +9.4% | -6.2% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +1.1% | -1.5% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.8% | +4.9% | -4.6% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.9% | +6.2% | -6.6% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.39x | 2.54x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $250M | -$812M | $2.8B | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $3.3B | $944M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $2.5B | $3.7B | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.29x | 0.60x | -10.22x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NET five years ago would be worth $35,891 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,656 for FSLY. Over the past 12 months, FSLY leads with a +223.4% total return vs PNFP's -4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NET at 77.1% vs SFNC's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +91.4% | +4.8% | +31.1% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +223.4% | -4.3% | +111.2% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.4% | +112.0% | +455.1% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.4% | +16.3% | +258.9% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.7% | +125.4% | +1328.1% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +28.5% | +77.1% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FSLY and NET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FSLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NET's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NET currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs FSLY's 56.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.11x | 1.53x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.82 | $120.46 | $260.00 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.84 | $81.07 | $120.55 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.0% | +81.9% | +98.9% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 63.0 | 70.1 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.9M | 1.4M | 3.7M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FSLY as "Hold", PNFP as "Buy", NET as "Buy", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.2% upside for PNFP (target: $118) vs -15.8% for NET (target: $216). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs PNFP's 0.91%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.50 | $117.63 | $216.43 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 21 | 40 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.89 | — | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PNFP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NET leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC?
On forward P/E, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) delivered a total return of +258. 9%, compared to -53. 4% for Fastly, Inc. (FSLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NET returned +1328% versus FSLY's -18. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fastly, Inc.
(FSLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Cloudflare, Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning NET is approximately 62% more volatile than FSLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for Cloudflare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fastly, Inc. grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NET leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC?
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
(PNFP) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 6% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNFP leads at 20. 4% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NET leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
(PNFP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 228. 9x for Cloudflare, Inc. — 219. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNFP: 19. 2% to $117. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC?
In this comparison, SFNC (4.
0% yield), PNFP (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FSLY, NET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
02), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFNC: +25. 2%, FSLY: -18. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSLY and PNFP and NET and SFNC?
These companies operate in different sectors (FSLY (Technology) and PNFP (Financial Services) and NET (Technology) and SFNC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FSLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PNFP is a small-cap high-growth stock; NET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. PNFP, SFNC pay a dividend while FSLY, NET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.