Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Software - Infrastructure
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Banks - Regional | Software - Infrastructure | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.05B | $7.58B | $90.83B | $3.09B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $653M | $2.85B | $2.33B | $627M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-103M | $624M | $-87M | $-398M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 58.7% | 49.1% | 73.5% | 5.8% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | -15.9% | 20.4% | -9.1% | -84.2% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 73.1x | 9.6x | 228.9x | 10.3x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $430M | $2.53B | $3.70B | $641M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $3.34B | $944M | $380M | $910M |
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fastly, Inc. (FSLY) | 100 | 45.2 | -54.8% |
| Pinnacle Financial … (PNFP) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) | 100 | 884.2 | +784.2% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 46.3%, current ratio 2.61x
- +223.4% vs PNFP's -4.3%
PNFP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 228.9x)
NET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.5%
- 13.3% 10Y total return vs PNFP's 125.4%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- PEG 3.55 vs PNFP's 3.59
- NIM 3.8% vs PNFP's 2.6%
- 27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 228.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.7% margin vs SFNC's -63.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs NET's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +223.4% vs PNFP's -4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs FSLY's -6.9%, ROIC 7.2% vs -7.8% |
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PNFP leads in 1 of 6 categories
HOMB leads 1 • NET leads 1 • FSLY leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NET and HOMB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PNFP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 4.6x SFNC's $627M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%. On growth, NET holds the edge at +33.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $653M | $2.9B | $2.3B | $627M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $841M | $67M | -$497M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$103M | $624M | -$87M | -$398M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $59M | $1.1B | $365M | $755M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.7% | +49.1% | +73.5% | +5.8% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | +20.4% | -9.1% | -84.2% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +16.6% | -3.7% | -63.4% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +28.3% | +15.7% | +71.7% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.8% | — | +33.5% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.9% | +17.7% | +36.4% | +42.1% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PNFP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 19% valuation discount to PNFP's 16.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 4.39x vs PNFP's 6.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $7.6B | $90.8B | $3.1B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $6.8B | $93.6B | $3.4B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.49x | 16.55x | -886.38x | -7.24x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 73.12x | 9.65x | 228.90x | 10.35x | 10.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.16x | — | — | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.96x | 1062.71x | — | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.89x | 2.66x | 41.90x | 4.93x | 3.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.08x | 1.18x | 61.38x | 0.84x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.38x | 9.39x | 280.08x | 6.88x | 12.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NET's 2.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs NET's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.9% | +9.4% | -6.2% | -11.6% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +1.1% | -1.5% | -1.6% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.8% | +4.9% | -4.6% | -9.1% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.9% | +6.2% | -6.6% | -4.2% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.39x | 2.54x | 0.19x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $250M | -$812M | $2.8B | $261M | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $3.3B | $944M | $380M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $430M | $2.5B | $3.7B | $641M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.29x | 0.60x | -10.22x | -1.01x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NET five years ago would be worth $35,891 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,656 for FSLY. Over the past 12 months, FSLY leads with a +223.4% total return vs PNFP's -4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NET at 77.1% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +91.4% | +4.8% | +31.1% | +14.6% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +223.4% | -4.3% | +111.2% | +16.7% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.4% | +112.0% | +455.1% | +53.4% | +42.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.4% | +16.3% | +258.9% | -15.4% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.7% | +125.4% | +1328.1% | +25.2% | +58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +28.5% | +77.1% | +15.3% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NET and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NET's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NET currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs FSLY's 56.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.11x | 1.53x | 1.02x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.82 | $120.46 | $260.00 | $22.18 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.84 | $81.07 | $120.55 | $17.00 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.0% | +81.9% | +98.9% | +96.3% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 63.0 | 70.1 | 62.3 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.9M | 1.4M | 3.7M | 1.2M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FSLY as "Hold", PNFP as "Buy", NET as "Buy", SFNC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.2% upside for PNFP (target: $118) vs -15.8% for NET (target: $216). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs PNFP's 0.91%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.50 | $117.63 | $216.43 | $22.67 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 21 | 40 | 9 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | +4.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 6 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.89 | — | $0.85 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
PNFP leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HOMB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FSLY vs PNFP vs NET vs SFNC vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 3. 55x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 's 3. 59x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) delivered a total return of +258. 9%, compared to -53. 4% for Fastly, Inc. (FSLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NET returned +1328% versus FSLY's -18. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Cloudflare, Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning NET is approximately 87% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for Cloudflare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fastly, Inc. grew EPS 27. 2% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NET leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NET leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 55x versus Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 's 3. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 228. 9x for Cloudflare, Inc. — 219. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNFP: 19. 2% to $117. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB?
In this comparison, SFNC (4.
0% yield), HOMB (2. 8% yield), PNFP (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FSLY, NET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FSLY or PNFP or NET or SFNC or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 2%, FSLY: -18. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSLY and PNFP and NET and SFNC and HOMB?
These companies operate in different sectors (FSLY (Technology) and PNFP (Financial Services) and NET (Technology) and SFNC (Financial Services) and HOMB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FSLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PNFP is a small-cap high-growth stock; NET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. PNFP, SFNC, HOMB pay a dividend while FSLY, NET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.