FSP vs VRE vs NXRT vs CBRE

For growth investors, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP). Veris Residential, Inc. (VRE) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the cheapest at 23. 7x versus CBRE Group, Inc. at 38. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) delivered a total return of +68. 8%, compared to -73. 8% for Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +404. 2% versus FSP's -65. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning CBRE is approximately 468% more volatile than VRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -10. 8% for Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Veris Residential, Inc. grew EPS 420. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBRE leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus -42. 0% for Franklin Street Properties Corp. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRE leads at 17. 1% versus -7. 6% for FSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBRE: 23.

0% to $180. 50.

In this comparison, NXRT (7.

1% yield), VRE (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FSP, CBRE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Veris Residential, Inc.

(VRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRE: -12. 8%, FSP: -65. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. VRE, NXRT pay a dividend while FSP, CBRE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.