Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FTEL vs VNET vs AMZN vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
FTEL vs VNET vs AMZN vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Information Technology Services | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $791K | $2.58B | $2.93T | $338.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $9.50B | $742.78B | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-568M | $90.80B | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 22.7% | 50.6% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | -114.7% | 9.0% | 11.5% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.6x | 31.4x | 4.2x |
| Total Debt | $580K | $18.45B | $152.99B | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $939K | $2.04B | $86.81B | $181.73B |
FTEL vs VNET vs AMZN vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 23 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fitell Corporation (FTEL) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 287.5 | +187.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 152.2 | +52.2% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 155.1 | +55.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTEL vs VNET vs AMZN vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FTEL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 4.22x
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 4.22x
- Beta 1.19 vs VNET's 2.66, lower leverage
VNET is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +48.3% vs FTEL's -78.7%
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs BABA's 82.2%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs FTEL's -6.9%
- 12.2% margin vs FTEL's -141.4%
BABA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 1.3%
- Lower P/E (4.2x vs 31.4x)
- 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs FTEL's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.2x vs 31.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs FTEL's -141.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs VNET's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.3% vs FTEL's -78.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs FTEL's -126.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -77.3% |
FTEL vs VNET vs AMZN vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FTEL vs VNET vs AMZN vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
VNET leads 1 • BABA leads 1 • FTEL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 114241.8x FTEL's $9M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTEL's -141.4%. On growth, FTEL holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $9.5B | $742.8B | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $2.8B | $155.9B | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$568M | $90.8B | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13M | -$3.9B | -$2.5B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +22.7% | +50.6% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -114.7% | +9.0% | +11.5% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -141.4% | -6.0% | +12.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -148.4% | -40.7% | -0.3% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.7% | +23.8% | +16.6% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +67.8% | -2.1% | +74.8% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FTEL and BABA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.8x trailing earnings, BABA trades at a 81% valuation discount to VNET's 91.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BABA's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $791,005 | $2.6B | $2.93T | $338.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $432,344 | $5.0B | $3.00T | $348.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.12x | 91.74x | 38.03x | 17.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.61x | 31.41x | 4.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.34x | 20.58x | 13.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 2.13x | 4.09x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.09x | 2.54x | 7.18x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 381.09x | 29.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-169 for FTEL. FTEL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs FTEL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -169.3% | -7.6% | +23.3% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -126.4% | -1.5% | +11.5% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -77.3% | +2.4% | +14.7% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.5% | +3.2% | +15.3% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 2.67x | 0.37x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$358,661 | $16.4B | $66.2B | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $939,014 | $2.0B | $86.8B | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $580,353 | $18.4B | $153.0B | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.50x | 1.75x | 39.96x | 15.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VNET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $17,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $466 for FTEL. Over the past 12 months, VNET leads with a +48.3% total return vs FTEL's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 43.8% vs FTEL's -64.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +62.9% | -2.3% | +20.4% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.7% | +48.3% | +42.0% | +12.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | +197.7% | +157.7% | +73.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -63.4% | +70.9% | -34.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -37.2% | +702.2% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -64.0% | +43.8% | +37.1% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FTEL and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTEL is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs FTEL's 4.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 2.66x | 1.50x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.20 | $14.48 | $278.56 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.40 | $5.15 | $188.82 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.7% | +61.5% | +97.9% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.3 | 52.2 | 74.2 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 122K | 5.7M | 45.2M | 10.4M |
Analyst Outlook
BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VNET as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 164.6% upside for VNET (target: $24) vs 12.5% for AMZN (target: $307). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.27% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $23.55 | $306.77 | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 94 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VNET leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FTEL vs VNET vs AMZN vs BABA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Fitell Corporation (FTEL). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 17. 8x trailing P/E (4. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA?
On trailing P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the cheapest at 17.
8x versus VNET Group, Inc. at 91. 7x. On forward P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +70. 9%, compared to -95. 3% for Fitell Corporation (FTEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus FTEL's -95. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fitell Corporation (FTEL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
19β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning VNET is approximately 123% more volatile than FTEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fitell Corporation (FTEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -6. 9% for Fitell Corporation (FTEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VNET Group, Inc. grew EPS 103. 8% year-over-year, compared to -228. 6% for Fitell Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus -208. 5% for Fitell Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14. 1% versus -179. 1% for FTEL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) trades at 4.
2x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 27. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNET: 164. 6% to $23. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. FTEL, VNET, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FTEL or VNET or AMZN or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
23), 1. 3% yield). VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +82. 2%, VNET: -37. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTEL and VNET and AMZN and BABA?
These companies operate in different sectors (FTEL (Consumer Cyclical) and VNET (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FTEL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. BABA pays a dividend while FTEL, VNET, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.