FTI
TechnipFMC plc
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$28.42B
5Y Perf.+1072.3%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FTI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR vs NOV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLB
SLB N.V.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$79.62B
5Y Perf.+187.2%
HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$32.68B
5Y Perf.+233.0%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$63.00B
5Y Perf.+284.8%
NOV
NOV Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$6.96B
5Y Perf.+54.8%
FTI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR vs NOV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FTI | SLB | HAL | BKR | NOV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $28.42B | $79.62B | $32.68B | $63.00B | $6.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.18B | $35.71B | $22.17B | $27.89B | $8.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.08B | $3.35B | $1.54B | $3.12B | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 18.2% | 15.3% | 23.6% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 15.3% | 11.3% | 25.3% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | 24.3x | 19.8x | 16.8x | 26.5x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.02B | $12.31B | $8.13B | $7.14B | $2.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.03B | $3.04B | $2.21B | $3.71B | $1.55B |
FTI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR vs NOV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FTI
SLB
HAL
BKR
NOV
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TechnipFMC plc (FTI) | 100 | 1172.3 | +1072.3% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 287.2 | +187.2% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 333.0 | +233.0% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 384.8 | +284.8% |
| NOV Inc. (NOV) | 100 | 154.8 | +54.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FTI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR vs NOV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FTI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. Halliburton Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. BKR and NOV also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
The Growth Play
FTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 221.3% 10Y total return vs BKR's 186.8%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
- +144.6% vs SLB's +61.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Income Angle
Among these 5 stocks, SLB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: energy exposure
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Defensive Pick
HAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.04x
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 26.5x)
- Beta 0.57 vs NOV's 1.01
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Quality Compounder
BKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 11.2% margin vs NOV's 1.0%
Best for: quality
NOV
NOV Inc.
The Income Pick
NOV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 2.6%
- 2.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FTI's 0.3%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FTI | 9.4% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3% |
| Value | HAL | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 26.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | BKR | 11.2% margin vs NOV's 1.0% |
| Stability / Safety | HAL | Beta 0.57 vs NOV's 1.01 |
| Dividends | NOV | 2.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FTI's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FTI | +144.6% vs SLB's +61.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FTI | 10.7% ROA vs NOV's 0.8%, ROIC 17.6% vs 5.8% |
FTI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR vs NOV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FTI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR vs NOV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFTILAGGINGHAL
Who Leads Where
NOV leads in 2 of 6 categories
FTI leads 2 • BKR leads 1 • SLB leads 0 • HAL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓HALHalliburton Company
0leads
SLBSLB N.V.
0leads
BKRBaker Hughes Company
1leads
NOVNOV Inc.
2leads
FTITechnipFMC plc
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NOVvs BKRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BKR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NOV4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FTI7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FTI6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
NOV2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 4.1x NOV's $8.7B. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NOV's 1.0%. On growth, FTI holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FTITechnipFMC plc | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.2B | $35.7B | $22.2B | $27.9B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $7.4B | $3.4B | $4.5B | $725M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $3.4B | $1.5B | $3.1B | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $4.8B | $1.7B | $2.6B | $734M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +18.2% | +15.3% | +23.6% | +19.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +15.3% | +11.3% | +25.3% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +9.4% | +6.9% | +11.2% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +13.4% | +7.6% | +9.4% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | +5.0% | -0.3% | +2.5% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.9% | -31.2% | +129.2% | +132.5% | -73.7% |
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NOV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 54% valuation discount to NOV's 49.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NOV's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTI's 21.0x.
| Metric | FTITechnipFMC plc | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28.4B | $79.6B | $32.7B | $63.0B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.4B | $88.9B | $38.6B | $66.4B | $7.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.89x | 22.57x | 26.09x | 24.43x | 49.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.26x | 19.79x | 16.85x | 26.48x | 21.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.02x | 12.07x | 11.37x | 14.00x | 8.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.86x | 2.23x | 1.47x | 2.27x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.74x | 2.89x | 3.13x | 3.32x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.63x | 16.60x | 19.55x | 24.83x | 8.06x |
NOV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTI delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $1 for NOV. NOV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTI scores 7/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FTITechnipFMC plc | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.2% | +13.9% | +14.6% | +16.1% | +1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.7% | +6.5% | +6.1% | +7.3% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.6% | +12.1% | +10.2% | +12.7% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.8% | +14.3% | +11.6% | +13.6% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.45x | 0.77x | 0.38x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $984M | $9.3B | $5.9B | $3.4B | $788M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $3.0B | $2.2B | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $12.3B | $8.1B | $7.1B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.62x | 9.40x | 9.19x | 9.68x | 5.82x |
FTI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTI five years ago would be worth $83,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,957 for NOV. Over the past 12 months, FTI leads with a +144.6% total return vs SLB's +61.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTI at 72.4% vs SLB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FTITechnipFMC plc | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +50.3% | +32.7% | +32.8% | +35.7% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +144.6% | +61.8% | +105.6% | +77.5% | +67.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +412.1% | +20.8% | +37.4% | +136.0% | +29.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +734.4% | +80.6% | +82.6% | +175.3% | +19.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.3% | -9.2% | +16.2% | +186.8% | -31.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +72.4% | +6.5% | +11.2% | +33.1% | +8.9% |
FTI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLB and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOV's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | FTITechnipFMC plc | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.87x | 0.57x | 0.83x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $77.78 | $57.20 | $42.46 | $70.41 | $20.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.87 | $31.64 | $19.22 | $35.83 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +92.7% | +92.2% | +90.2% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 57.9 | 55.7 | 57.1 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 16.3M | 15.0M | 9.1M | 4.8M |
Evenly matched — SLB and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
NOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FTI as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", BKR as "Buy", NOV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.3% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, NOV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.63% vs FTI's 0.28%.
| Metric | FTITechnipFMC plc | SLBSLB N.V. | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | NOVNOV Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.38 | $56.95 | $37.08 | $72.00 | $19.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 50 | 66 | 64 | 45 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.0% | +1.8% | +1.4% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $1.08 | $0.69 | $0.92 | $0.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | +3.0% | +3.1% | +0.6% | +4.5% |
NOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NOV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). FTI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallTechnipFMC plc (FTI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FTI vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR vs NOV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TechnipFMC plc (FTI) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV?
On trailing P/E, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 22. 6x versus NOV Inc. at 49. 5x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 16. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV?
Over the past 5 years, TechnipFMC plc (FTI) delivered a total return of +734.
4%, compared to +19. 6% for NOV Inc. (NOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTI returned +221. 3% versus NOV's -31. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus NOV Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning NOV is approximately 76% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NOV Inc. (NOV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TechnipFMC plc grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -75. 6% for NOV Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTI leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV?
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
7% net margin versus 1. 7% for NOV Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus 6. 5% for NOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKR leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 16.
8x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for Baker Hughes Company — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 13. 3% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NOV Inc. (NOV) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 3% for TechnipFMC plc (FTI).
09Is FTI or SLB or HAL or BKR or NOV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +16. 2%, NOV: -31. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FTI and SLB and HAL and BKR and NOV?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SLB, HAL, BKR, NOV pay a dividend while FTI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FTI: 11.2% · SLB: 5.0%)Net Margin>
%
(FTI: 10.6% · SLB: 9.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FTI: 30.9x · SLB: 22.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.