FUBO vs WBD vs FOXA vs NFLX vs DIS

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Fox Corporation (FOXA) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the cheapest at 12.

8x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fox Corporation wins at 0. 54x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FUBO is approximately 354% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -2. 6% for FUBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 54x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOXA) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.

In this comparison, FOXA (1.

0% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FUBO, WBD, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, FUBO: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FOXA, DIS pay a dividend while FUBO, WBD, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.