Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FUN vs AMZN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FUN
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.99B
5Y Perf.-38.1%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%

FUN vs AMZN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FUN logoFUN
AMZN logoAMZN
IndustryLeisureSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$1.99B$2.96T
Revenue (TTM)$3.14B$742.78B
Net Income (TTM)$-1.75B$90.80B
Gross Margin73.8%50.6%
Operating Margin-41.4%11.5%
Forward P/E35.3x
Total Debt$5.16B$152.99B
Cash & Equiv.$83M$86.81B

FUN vs AMZNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FUN
AMZN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Six Flags Entertain… (FUN)10061.9-38.1%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100225.1+125.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FUN vs AMZN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMZN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FUN
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
The Growth Play

FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
  • 50.6% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Income Pick

AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.51
  • 7.2% 10Y total return vs FUN's -37.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.05x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUN logoFUN50.6% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
ValueFUN logoFUNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsAMZN logoAMZN12.2% margin vs FUN's -55.7%
Stability / SafetyAMZN logoAMZNBeta 1.51 vs FUN's 1.83, lower leverage
DividendsFUN logoFUN1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMZN logoAMZN+48.6% vs FUN's -44.4%
Efficiency (ROA)AMZN logoAMZN11.5% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs 5.1%

FUN vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FUNSix Flags Entertainment Corporation
FY 2024
Admission
51.8%$1.4B
Food, Merchandise and Gaming
33.2%$898M
Accommodations, Extra-Charge Products And Other
15.0%$407M
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B

FUN vs AMZN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGFUN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 236.7x FUN's $3.1B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.1B$742.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$828M$155.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1.7B$90.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$169M-$2.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.8%+50.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-41.4%+11.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-55.7%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.4%-0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.3%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.7%+74.8%
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FUN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, FUN's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.7x.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.0B$2.96T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7.1B$3.02T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-8.56x38.35x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.35.26x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.25x20.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.74x4.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.87x7.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF37.91x384.26x
FUN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.0%+23.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-22.1%+11.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.1%+14.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.2%+15.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.26x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.1B$66.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$83M$86.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.2B$153.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.53x39.96x
AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,558 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs FUN's -44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs FUN's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+27.1%+21.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-44.4%+48.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.7%+159.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.4%+66.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.5%+715.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.9%+37.5%
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 51.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.83x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.47$278.56
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.51$183.85
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+51.2%+98.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.380.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M45.6M
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates FUN as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for FUN (target: $23) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307). FUN is the only dividend payer here at 1.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFUN logoFUNSix Flags Enterta…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.88$306.77
# AnalystsCovering analysts2994
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.31
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

AMZN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FUN vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FUN or AMZN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (35. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FUN or AMZN?

Over the past 5 years, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -54. 4% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FUN or AMZN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 21% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 2% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FUN or AMZN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.

6% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FUN or AMZN?

Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUN leads at 11. 5% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FUN or AMZN more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUN: 16.

2% to $22. 88.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FUN or AMZN?

In this comparison, FUN (1.

6% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is FUN or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.

com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, FUN: -37. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FUN and AMZN?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. FUN pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FUN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 44%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FUN and AMZN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FUN: -2.3% · AMZN: 16.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.