Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FUN vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
FUN vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.99B | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.14B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.75B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 73.8% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -41.4% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.16B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $86.81B |
FUN vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUN vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
- 50.6% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4%
- Better valuation composite
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.51
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs FUN's -37.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.6% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs FUN's -55.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs FUN's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.6% vs FUN's -44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs 5.1% |
FUN vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FUN vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 236.7x FUN's $3.1B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$828M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.7B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$169M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.8% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.4% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -55.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.7% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FUN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FUN's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.1B | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.56x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.25x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.91x | 384.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.1% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.26x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.1B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.53x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,558 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs FUN's -44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs FUN's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.1% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.4% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.7% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.4% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.5% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.9% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 51.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.47 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.51 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.2% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 45.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FUN as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for FUN (target: $23) vs 11.6% for AMZN (target: $307). FUN is the only dividend payer here at 1.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.88 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FUN vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUN or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (35. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FUN or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -54. 4% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FUN or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 21% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 2% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FUN or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.
6% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FUN or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUN leads at 11. 5% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FUN or AMZN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUN: 16.
2% to $22. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — FUN or AMZN?
In this comparison, FUN (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. AMZN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FUN or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, FUN: -37. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FUN and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. FUN pays a dividend while AMZN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.