Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FUN vs PRKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
FUN vs PRKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $1.84B | $1.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.14B | $1.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.75B | $168M |
| Gross Margin | 73.8% | 92.3% |
| Operating Margin | -41.4% | 22.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $5.16B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $100M |
FUN vs PRKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 198.0 | +98.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUN vs PRKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
- 50.6% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
PRKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 86.8% 10Y total return vs FUN's -41.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.54, current ratio 0.70x
- Beta 1.54, current ratio 0.70x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.6% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs FUN's -55.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.54 vs FUN's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -25.6% vs FUN's -49.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 25.5% vs 5.1% |
FUN vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FUN vs PRKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 1.9x PRKS's $1.7B. PRKS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$828M | $540M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.7B | $168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$169M | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.8% | +92.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.4% | +22.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -55.7% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.7% | -44.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FUN and PRKS each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FUN's 11.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.88x | 11.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.00x | 3.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.68x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.91x | 7.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRKS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRKS scores 5/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.1% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +15.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.26x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.1B | -$100M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.53x | 2.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRKS five years ago would be worth $6,433 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,223 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, PRKS leads with a -25.6% total return vs FUN's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRKS at -14.7% vs FUN's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.3% | -25.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | -37.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.8% | -35.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.0% | +86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.6% | -14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PRKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRKS currently trades 60.1% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.47 | $56.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.51 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.1% | +60.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 977K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FUN as "Buy" and PRKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.1% upside for PRKS (target: $48) vs 26.2% for FUN (target: $23). FUN is the only dividend payer here at 1.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.88 | $47.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
PRKS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
FUN vs PRKS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUN or PRKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 11. 2x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FUN or PRKS?
Over the past 5 years, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) delivered a total return of -35. 7%, compared to -57. 8% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +95. 2% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FUN or PRKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 54β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 19% more volatile than PRKS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FUN or PRKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.
6% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Parks & Resorts Inc. grew EPS -19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FUN or PRKS?
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus 11. 5% for FUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FUN or PRKS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 39.
1% to $47. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — FUN or PRKS?
In this comparison, FUN (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. PRKS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FUN or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUN: -37. 5%, PRKS: +95. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FUN and PRKS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock. FUN pays a dividend while PRKS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare PRKS vs EPR
EPR is one of the most direct listed alternatives to PRKS.
Compare FUN vs DIS
DIS overlaps with FUN in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With EPR + DIS
EPR and DIS are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.