Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FUN vs DIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
FUN vs DIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $1.99B | $191.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.14B | $97.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.75B | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 73.8% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -41.4% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $5.16B | $44.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $5.70B |
FUN vs DIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUN vs DIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
- 50.6% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4%
- 1.6% yield, vs DIS's 0.9%
DIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 0.9%
- 10.9% 10Y total return vs FUN's -37.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 39.2%, current ratio 0.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.6% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs FUN's -55.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs FUN's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, vs DIS's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.5% vs FUN's -44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 6.9% vs 5.1% |
FUN vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FUN vs DIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 31.0x FUN's $3.1B. DIS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%. On growth, DIS holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $97.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$828M | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.7B | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$169M | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.8% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.4% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -55.7% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.7% | -29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FUN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FUN's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DIS's 12.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $191.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.1B | $230.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.56x | 15.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.25x | 12.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 2.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.91x | 18.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DIS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DIS delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs FUN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.1% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.26x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.1B | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.53x | 9.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DIS five years ago would be worth $6,078 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,558 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +18.5% total return vs FUN's -44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DIS at 2.4% vs FUN's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.1% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.4% | +18.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.7% | +7.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.4% | -39.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.5% | +10.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.9% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
DIS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 51.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.47 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.51 | $91.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.2% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FUN and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FUN as "Buy" and DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.2% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs 16.2% for FUN (target: $23). For income investors, FUN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.56% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.88 | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.31 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% |
DIS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FUN vs DIS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUN or DIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FUN or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) delivered a total return of -39.
2%, compared to -54. 4% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DIS returned +10. 9% versus FUN's -37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FUN or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 103% more volatile than DIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 2% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FUN or DIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.
6% versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FUN or DIS?
The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DIS leads at 14. 6% versus 11. 5% for FUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FUN or DIS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 29.
2% to $139. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — FUN or DIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 9% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS).
08Is FUN or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90), 0. 9% yield). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DIS: +10. 9%, FUN: -37. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FUN and DIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FUN (Consumer Cyclical) and DIS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.