Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FUNC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs CZFS vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
FUNC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs CZFS vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $248M | $203M | $415M | $317M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $90M | $208M | $173M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $14M | $35M | $37M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 54.7% | 51.6% | 63.3% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 7.0% | 23.3% | 26.0% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 11.8x | 9.6x | 8.4x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $188M | $52M | $180M | $309M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $119M | $225M | $38M | $599M |
FUNC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs CZFS vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 355.9 | +255.9% |
| Citizens Financial … (CZFS) | 100 | 133.1 | +33.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUNC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs CZFS vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs BWFG's 175.8%
- 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs BWFG's 0.84, lower leverage
BWFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.22 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.22 vs 2.32
- +55.7% vs FIS's -35.3%
CZFS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 3.0%
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 21.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
Among these 5 stocks, FIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.22 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs BWFG's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.7% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 5.9% vs 2.0% |
FUNC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs CZFS vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FUNC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs CZFS vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CZFS leads in 2 of 6 categories
FUNC leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZFS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. CZFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $90M | $208M | $173M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $9M | $53M | $45M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $14M | $35M | $37M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $11M | -$5M | $35M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.8% | +54.7% | +51.6% | +63.3% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +7.0% | +23.3% | +26.0% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +16.0% | +16.9% | +21.1% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +11.5% | +12.6% | +20.3% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.2% | +63.0% | +2.1% | +31.3% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CZFS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, CZFS trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.27x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $248M | $203M | $415M | $317M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $357M | $136M | $370M | $588M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.12x | 14.44x | 11.71x | 8.65x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.68x | 11.78x | 9.62x | 8.44x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.08x | 2.85x | 0.27x | 2.17x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.52x | 15.28x | 7.04x | 13.04x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 2.25x | 2.00x | 1.83x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 1.09x | 1.35x | 0.94x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.18x | 19.55x | 15.90x | 8.99x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FUNC and CZWI each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 6/9 vs CZFS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +7.8% | +12.2% | +11.4% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +2.0% | +8.0% | +5.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +0.6% | +4.4% | +7.0% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 0.28x | 0.60x | 0.92x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $109M | -$67M | -$45M | $271M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $119M | $225M | $38M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $52M | $180M | $309M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 0.16x | 0.49x | 0.74x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +55.7% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs CZFS's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.4% | +21.5% | +16.1% | +19.3% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | +45.6% | +55.7% | +18.8% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.6% | +160.0% | +144.3% | -10.6% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.5% | +71.2% | +92.1% | +29.5% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +289.2% | +157.0% | +175.8% | +82.2% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.1% | +37.5% | +34.7% | -3.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWFG's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.46x | 0.84x | 0.67x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.95 | $22.62 | $53.86 | $69.61 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.00 | $12.83 | $33.26 | $49.99 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +93.2% | +96.8% | +94.7% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 63.7 | 55.8 | 48.7 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 40K | 40K | 8K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FUNC and CZWI and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy", CZFS as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BWFG's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | — | — | — | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.8% | +1.5% | +3.0% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $0.37 | $0.80 | $1.99 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +3.1% | +0.3% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
CZFS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FUNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FUNC vs CZWI vs BWFG vs CZFS vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
(CZFS) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 84β — meaning BWFG is approximately 83% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS?
Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
(CZFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZFS leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 5% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is FUNC or CZWI or BWFG or CZFS or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, FIS: -13. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUNC and CZWI and BWFG and CZFS and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FUNC (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and BWFG (Financial Services) and CZFS (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.