Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FUNC vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
FUNC vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $244M | $30.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $188M | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $798M |
FUNC vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 272.6 | +172.6% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 52.6 | -47.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUNC vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 283.2% 10Y total return vs FISV's 9.3%
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs FUNC's 0.76
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 8.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.76
- 4.0% ROA vs FUNC's 1.2%, ROIC 8.1% vs 5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs FISV's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 8.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.4% margin vs FISV's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs FISV's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.7% vs FISV's -69.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs FUNC's 1.2%, ROIC 8.1% vs 5.9% |
FUNC vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FUNC vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 188.6x FUNC's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.4% (FUNC) to 15.2% (FISV).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.8% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.2% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 26% valuation discount to FUNC's 11.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs FUNC's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $244M | $30.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $353M | $58.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.91x | 8.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.53x | 6.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 6.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 1.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.37x | 1.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.97x | 6.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $12 for FISV. FUNC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 6/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $109M | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,750 for FISV. Over the past 12 months, FUNC leads with a +27.7% total return vs FISV's -69.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 46.3% vs FISV's -22.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | -14.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | -69.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +213.3% | -53.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.8% | -52.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.2% | +9.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.3% | -22.3% |
Risk & Volatility
FUNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISV's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUNC currently trades 89.4% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.95 | $191.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.00 | $52.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.4% | +29.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 39.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FUNC as "Buy" and FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.0% upside for FISV (target: $75) vs -33.4% for FUNC (target: $25). FUNC is the only dividend payer here at 2.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $74.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +19.7% |
FUNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FUNC vs FISV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUNC or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUNC or FISV?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus First United Corporation at 11. 9x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus First United Corporation's 0. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUNC or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +129.
8%, compared to -52. 5% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +283. 2% versus FISV's +9. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUNC or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First United Corporation (FUNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning FISV is approximately 32% more volatile than FUNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First United Corporation (FUNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 105% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUNC or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus 3. 6% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to 17. 8% for Fiserv, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUNC or FISV?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus 16. 4% for Fiserv, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 24. 4% for FUNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUNC or FISV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus First United Corporation's 0. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 5x for First United Corporation — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FISV: 33. 0% to $74. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUNC or FISV?
In this comparison, FUNC (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FUNC or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +283. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +283. 2%, FISV: +9. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUNC and FISV?
These companies operate in different sectors (FUNC (Financial Services) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FUNC pays a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.