Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FUNC vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FUNC vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $243M | $246M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $188M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $161M |
FUNC vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 272.6 | +172.6% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 207.1 | +107.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUNC vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 282.2% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 237.2%
- PEG 0.76 vs FXNC's 7.74
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 11.6x), PEG 0.76 vs 7.74
FXNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 0.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs FUNC's 16.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 11.6x), PEG 0.76 vs 7.74 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.1% vs FUNC's +24.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
FUNC vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FUNC vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC and FUNC operate at a comparable scale, with $112M and $112M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.4% (FUNC) to 15.8% (FXNC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.8% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.2% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 15% valuation discount to FXNC's 13.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.06x vs FXNC's 9.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $243M | $246M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $352M | $128M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.87x | 13.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.53x | 11.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | 9.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.36x | 5.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.17x | 2.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.94x | 11.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for FXNC. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs FUNC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $109M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,495 for FXNC. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +43.1% total return vs FUNC's +24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 44.5% vs FXNC's 27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | +11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.4% | +43.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.9% | +105.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.9% | +64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +282.2% | +237.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.5% | +27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FXNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.95 | $29.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.00 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 40.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 78K |
Analyst Outlook
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FUNC as "Buy" and FXNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -23.0% upside for FXNC (target: $21) vs -33.2% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FXNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.25% vs FUNC's 2.20%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.1% |
FXNC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUNC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
FUNC vs FXNC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUNC or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 9% for First United Corporation (FUNC). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUNC or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus First National Corporation at 13. 9x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus First National Corporation's 7. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUNC or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +126.
9%, compared to +64. 9% for First National Corporation (FXNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +283. 2% versus FXNC's +239. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUNC or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First National Corporation (FXNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus First United Corporation's 0. 72β — meaning FUNC is approximately 2% more volatile than FXNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUNC or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus 16. 9% for First United Corporation (FUNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 40. 0% for First United Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUNC or FXNC?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus 15. 8% for First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 19. 6% for FXNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUNC or FXNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus First National Corporation's 7. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for First National Corporation — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FXNC: -23. 0% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUNC or FXNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First National Corporation (FXNC) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 2. 2% for First United Corporation (FUNC).
09Is FUNC or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +283. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +283. 2%, FXNC: +239. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUNC and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.