Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FURY vs VZLA vs MTA vs EXK vs USAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Other Precious Metals
Other Precious Metals
Industrial Materials
FURY vs VZLA vs MTA vs EXK vs USAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Other Precious Metals | Other Precious Metals | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $113M | $1.18B | $659M | $2.99B | $2.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $4M | $330M | $109M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-109M | $-16M | $-9M | $-94M | $-61M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 46.4% | 9.3% | 3.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -191.5% | -1.7% | -25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 111.3x | 14.3x | 26.3x |
| Total Debt | $65K | $0.00 | $11M | $120M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $133M | $5M | $106M | $20M |
FURY vs VZLA vs MTA vs EXK vs USAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fury Gold Mines Lim… (FURY) | 100 | 89.5 | -10.5% |
| Vizsla Silver Corp. (VZLA) | 100 | 179.6 | +79.6% |
| Metalla Royalty & S… (MTA) | 100 | 112.3 | +12.3% |
| Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK) | 100 | 278.8 | +178.8% |
| Americas Gold and S… (USAS) | 100 | 425.3 | +325.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FURY vs VZLA vs MTA vs EXK vs USAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FURY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 5.32x
VZLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 34.06x
- 0.8% margin vs MTA's -223.0%
- Beta 1.34 vs USAS's 2.31
- -3.1% ROA vs FURY's -125.8%, ROIC -7.2% vs -4.4%
MTA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.42
EXK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 182.7% 10Y total return vs MTA's 25.3%
- 5.9% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2%
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 26.3x)
USAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.5%
- +418.7% vs VZLA's +51.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs FURY's -9.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 26.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.8% margin vs MTA's -223.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs USAS's 2.31 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +418.7% vs VZLA's +51.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.1% ROA vs FURY's -125.8%, ROIC -7.2% vs -4.4% |
FURY vs VZLA vs MTA vs EXK vs USAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FURY vs VZLA vs MTA vs EXK vs USAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXK leads in 2 of 6 categories
VZLA leads 1 • USAS leads 1 • FURY leads 0 • MTA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXK and VZLA operate at a comparable scale, with $330M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -28.4% (EXK) to -2.2% (MTA). On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $4M | $330M | $109M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | -$34M | -$6M | $49M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$109M | -$16M | -$9M | -$94M | -$61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$45M | -$7M | -$129M | -$52M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +46.4% | +9.3% | +3.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -191.5% | -1.7% | -25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -2.2% | -28.4% | -56.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -168.6% | -39.1% | -47.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +107.2% | +154.0% | +45.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +11.9% | +28.8% | -97.5% | +55.3% |
Valuation Metrics
EXK leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $1.2B | $659M | $3.0B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $109M | $1.1B | $665M | $3.0B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.11x | -159.19x | -29.67x | -78.08x | -15.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 111.25x | 14.34x | 26.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 76.02x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 273.07x | 13.72x | 20.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 3.06x | 2.69x | 5.07x | 12.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VZLA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VZLA delivers a -3.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-135 for FURY. FURY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USAS's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTA scores 4/9 vs FURY's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -135.1% | -3.1% | -6.7% | -18.4% | -122.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -125.8% | -3.1% | -6.4% | -9.2% | -26.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | -7.2% | -4.0% | +1.5% | -26.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | -7.2% | -5.2% | +1.6% | -21.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 0.09x | 0.25x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$133M | $6M | $14M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $133M | $5M | $106M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65,000 | $0 | $11M | $120M | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9916.09x | — | -2.64x | -39.17x | -18.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXK five years ago would be worth $16,111 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,440 for FURY. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +418.7% total return vs VZLA's +51.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAS at 80.8% vs FURY's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.5% | -37.9% | -8.1% | +12.5% | +24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.2% | +51.1% | +131.9% | +193.4% | +418.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | +134.9% | +40.6% | +144.0% | +490.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.6% | +40.6% | -25.6% | +61.1% | +35.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | +40.6% | +2531.4% | +182.7% | -5.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | +32.9% | +12.0% | +34.6% | +80.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VZLA and MTA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZLA is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTA currently trades 77.0% from its 52-week high vs VZLA's 47.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.34x | 1.42x | 1.71x | 2.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.02 | $7.19 | $9.25 | $15.15 | $10.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $2.23 | $2.75 | $3.14 | $1.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.3% | +47.7% | +77.0% | +67.0% | +60.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 51.3 | 55.8 | 47.6 | 56.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 466K | 7.5M | 486K | 9.4M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FURY as "Buy", VZLA as "Buy", MTA as "Buy", EXK as "Buy", USAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 236.1% upside for FURY (target: $2) vs 5.3% for MTA (target: $8).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $7.00 | $7.50 | $12.75 | $9.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EXK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VZLA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
FURY vs VZLA vs MTA vs EXK vs USAS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FURY or VZLA or MTA or EXK or USAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Endeavour Silver Corp.
(EXK) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). Analysts rate Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FURY or VZLA or MTA or EXK or USAS?
Over the past 5 years, Endeavour Silver Corp.
(EXK) delivered a total return of +61. 1%, compared to -55. 6% for Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTA returned +25. 3% versus FURY's -53. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FURY or VZLA or MTA or EXK or USAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vizsla Silver Corp.
(VZLA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 31β — meaning USAS is approximately 72% more volatile than VZLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 45% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FURY or VZLA or MTA or EXK or USAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Endeavour Silver Corp.
(EXK) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus -18. 7% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vizsla Silver Corp. grew EPS 60. 9% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, USAS leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FURY or VZLA or MTA or EXK or USAS?
Fury Gold Mines Limited (FURY) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -452. 8% for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXK leads at 3. 8% versus -255. 3% for MTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTA leads at 25. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FURY or VZLA or MTA or EXK or USAS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Endeavour Silver Corp.
(EXK) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 111. 3x for Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. — 96. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FURY: 236. 1% to $2. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — FURY or VZLA or MTA or EXK or USAS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FURY or VZLA or MTA or EXK or USAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vizsla Silver Corp.
(VZLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZLA: +40. 6%, USAS: -5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FURY and VZLA and MTA and EXK and USAS?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.