Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FUSE logo
FUSE
AIOT logo
AIOT
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
MSFT logo
MSFT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FUSE vs AIOT vs KO vs JPM vs MSFT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FUSE
Fusemachines Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$37M
5Y Perf.-88.6%
AIOT
PowerFleet, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$523M
5Y Perf.-16.0%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$342.09B
5Y Perf.+24.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$842.21B
5Y Perf.+54.4%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.10T
5Y Perf.-6.8%

FUSE vs AIOT vs KO vs JPM vs MSFT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FUSE logoFUSE
AIOT logoAIOT
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
MSFT logoMSFT
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationCommunication EquipmentBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - DiversifiedSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$37M$523M$342.09B$842.21B$3.10T
Revenue (TTM)$10M$436M$49.28B$270.79B$318.27B
Net Income (TTM)$262K$-32M$13.70B$58.03B$125.22B
Gross Margin54.8%55.2%61.7%58.6%68.3%
Operating Margin-89.5%1.7%29.3%27.7%46.8%
Forward P/E24.3x14.0x24.8x
Total Debt$1M$287M$45.49B$751.15B$112.18B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$49M$10.27B$469.32B$30.24B

FUSE vs AIOT vs KO vs JPM vs MSFTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FUSE
AIOT
KO
JPM
MSFT
StockJun 24Jun 26Return
Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE)10011.4-88.6%
PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT)10084.0-16.0%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100124.9+24.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100154.4+54.4%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)10093.2-6.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FUSE vs AIOT vs KO vs JPM vs MSFT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSFT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. PowerFleet, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPM also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇MSFT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FUSE
Fusemachines Inc.
The Technology Pick

FUSE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
AIOT
PowerFleet, Inc.
The Growth Play

AIOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 66.3%, EPS growth 60.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
  • 66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
  • 19.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, KO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 1.08 vs KO's 2.18
  • Lower P/E (14.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.08 vs 2.18
  • +21.5% vs FUSE's -89.1%
Best for: valuation efficiency
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 0.8%
  • 7.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 435.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
  • Beta 0.86, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAIOT logoAIOT66.3% revenue growth vs FUSE's -98.6%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 1.08 vs 2.18
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs AIOT's -7.4%
Stability / SafetyMSFT logoMSFTBeta 0.86 vs AIOT's 2.69, lower leverage
DividendsAIOT logoAIOT19.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)JPM logoJPM+21.5% vs FUSE's -89.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MSFT logoMSFT19.2% ROA vs AIOT's -3.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs -4.3%

FUSE vs AIOT vs KO vs JPM vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the AI Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the AI Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FUSEFusemachines Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AIOTPowerFleet, Inc.
FY 2024
Service
62.8%$84M
Product
37.2%$50M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2024
Consumer & Community Banking
40.3%$71.5B
Commercial And Investment Bank
39.5%$70.1B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
12.2%$21.6B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
9.8%$17.4B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,037,000,000
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B

FUSE vs AIOT vs KO vs JPM vs MSFT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGAIOT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 33177.6x FUSE's $10M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIOT's -7.4%. On growth, AIOT holds the edge at +47.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$10M$436M$49.3B$270.8B$318.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$8M$69M$15.5B$81.3B$192.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$261,897-$32M$13.7B$58.0B$125.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M$3M$12.6B-$119.7B$72.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.8%+55.2%+61.7%+58.6%+68.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-89.5%+1.7%+29.3%+27.7%+46.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.7%-7.4%+27.8%+21.6%+39.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-82.3%+0.6%+25.5%-15.5%+22.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.8%+47.4%+12.1%+18.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-25.5%+18.2%+16.0%+23.4%
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.8x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 48% valuation discount to MSFT's 30.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.22x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$37M$523M$342.1B$842.2B$3.10T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$34M$761M$377.3B$1.12T$3.18T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.90x-8.93x26.14x15.82x30.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.31x14.03x24.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x1.22x1.62x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple47.93x25.47x13.54x19.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.80x1.44x7.14x3.11x10.99x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.03x10.00x2.61x9.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF64.59x43.22x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-7 for AIOT. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs FUSE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.6%+41.1%+16.1%+33.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%-3.4%+13.1%+1.3%+19.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.3%+15.8%+5.4%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.5%-5.1%+17.3%+8.2%+29.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–923756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.64x1.33x2.18x0.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$238M$35.2B$281.8B$81.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$49M$10.3B$469.3B$30.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$287M$45.5B$751.1B$112.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.49x0.47x10.70x0.74x55.65x
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,314 for FUSE. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.5% total return vs FUSE's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.0% vs FUSE's -50.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-24.7%-26.9%+15.8%-3.1%-11.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-89.1%-16.7%+15.0%+21.5%-10.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.8%-19.5%+40.5%+135.5%+26.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.9%-19.5%+58.5%+102.5%+70.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.9%-19.5%+112.9%+435.6%+745.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.4%-7.0%+12.0%+33.0%+8.3%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIOT's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FUSE's 5.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.39x2.69x-0.15x0.95x0.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.00$5.88$82.66$337.25$555.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.80$2.77$65.35$260.31$356.28
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.1%+65.3%+96.1%+92.6%+75.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.073.937.758.452.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.8M1.5M12.7M7.1M33.6M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AIOT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AIOT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.3% upside for AIOT (target: $8) vs 8.5% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, AIOT offers the higher dividend yield at 19.62% vs MSFT's 0.77%.

MetricFUSE logoFUSEFusemachines Inc.AIOT logoAIOTPowerFleet, Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$86.29$338.78$551.96
# AnalystsCovering analysts5486182
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+19.6%+2.6%+1.6%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1561521
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.75$2.04$5.13$3.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.5%+0.2%+3.4%+0.6%
Evenly matched — AIOT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FUSE vs AIOT vs KO vs JPM vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger pick with 14.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Microsoft Corporation at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 08x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 5%, compared to -86. 9% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +745. 5% versus FUSE's -86. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus PowerFleet, Inc. 's 2. 69β — meaning AIOT is approximately -1917% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is pulling ahead at 14.

9% versus -98. 6% for Fusemachines Inc. (FUSE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fusemachines Inc. grew EPS 86. 1% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus -14. 1% for PowerFleet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -77. 2% for FUSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 08x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Microsoft Corporation — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIOT: 108. 3% to $8. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT?

In this comparison, AIOT (19.

6% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 6% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FUSE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FUSE or AIOT or KO or JPM or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +112. 9%, FUSE: -86. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FUSE and AIOT and KO and JPM and MSFT?

These companies operate in different sectors (FUSE (Technology) and AIOT (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FUSE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT, KO, JPM, MSFT pay a dividend while FUSE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.