REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FVR vs ADC vs NNN vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
FVR vs ADC vs NNN vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $410M | $9.17B | $8.47B | $57.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $750M | $936M | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $220M | $387M | $800M |
| Gross Margin | -32.9% | 87.6% | 81.4% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 48.0% | 63.3% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.9x | 21.7x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $3.35B | $4.82B | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $16M | $5M | $435M |
FVR vs ADC vs NNN vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Agree Realty Corpor… (ADC) | 100 | 102.8 | +2.8% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 102.5 | +2.5% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 104.1 | +4.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FVR vs ADC vs NNN vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FVR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 85.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- +63.8% vs ADC's +4.3%
ADC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 135.6% 10Y total return vs O's 45.1%
- 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
NNN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 37.1x), PEG 1.94 vs 71.28
- 41.4% margin vs FVR's -4.2%
- 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 4.1% ROA vs FVR's -0.3%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.3%
O is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 81.9%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.09, yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.09 vs FVR's 0.90
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 37.1x), PEG 1.94 vs 71.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs FVR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs FVR's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.8% vs ADC's +4.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs FVR's -0.3%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.3% |
FVR vs ADC vs NNN vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FVR vs ADC vs NNN vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FVR leads in 1 of 6 categories
NNN leads 1 • ADC leads 1 • O leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ADC and NNN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 85.7x FVR's $69M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FVR's -4.2%. On growth, ADC holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $750M | $936M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $638M | $867M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $220M | $387M | $800M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $41M | $110M | $464M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | +87.6% | +81.4% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +48.0% | +63.3% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +29.3% | +41.4% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +59.6% | +14.7% | +49.6% | +67.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +18.7% | +4.1% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | +19.0% | -2.0% | -103.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FVR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 59% valuation discount to O's 52.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NNN offers better value at 1.93x vs ADC's 113.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $410M | $9.2B | $8.5B | $57.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $411M | $12.5B | $13.3B | $90.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -83.14x | 43.12x | 21.50x | 52.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.94x | 21.69x | 37.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 113.70x | 1.93x | 71.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.24x | 20.30x | 15.85x | 21.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.11x | 12.76x | 9.14x | 10.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.35x | 1.90x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.73x | 18.18x | 12.69x | 14.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-1 for FVR. FVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NNN's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVR scores 5/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +3.7% | +8.8% | +2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +2.3% | +4.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +2.8% | +4.8% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +3.8% | +6.4% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.53x | 1.09x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $956,000 | $3.3B | $4.8B | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $16M | $5M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $3.4B | $4.8B | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | 2.54x | 2.93x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADC five years ago would be worth $12,927 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,459 for FVR. Over the past 12 months, FVR leads with a +63.8% total return vs ADC's +4.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADC at 8.0% vs FVR's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.3% | +7.3% | +15.6% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +63.8% | +4.3% | +12.4% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +26.1% | +15.1% | +13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +29.3% | +15.0% | +16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | +135.6% | +37.8% | +45.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +8.0% | +4.8% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FVR and ADC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADC is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FVR's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FVR currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs O's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | -0.14x | 0.15x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.48 | $82.08 | $46.03 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.81 | $69.56 | $38.90 | $54.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +93.0% | +96.7% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 46.8 | 58.4 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 1.1M | 1.5M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NNN and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FVR as "Buy", ADC as "Buy", NNN as "Hold", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for ADC (target: $84) vs -5.2% for FVR (target: $17). For income investors, NNN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.30% vs ADC's 4.01%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.33 | $83.50 | $46.06 | $65.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 32 | 29 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% | +5.3% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 9 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.06 | $2.36 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FVR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NNN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FVR vs ADC vs NNN vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVR or ADC or NNN or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FVR or ADC or NNN or O?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Realty Income Corporation at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NNN REIT, Inc. wins at 1. 94x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FVR or ADC or NNN or O?
Over the past 5 years, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) delivered a total return of +29.
3%, compared to +4. 6% for FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADC returned +135. 6% versus FVR's +4. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FVR or ADC or NNN or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus FrontView REIT, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning FVR is approximately -748% more volatile than ADC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 109% for NNN REIT, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FVR or ADC or NNN or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FrontView REIT, Inc. grew EPS 85. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FVR or ADC or NNN or O?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -5. 7% for FrontView REIT, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 16. 9% for FVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FVR or ADC or NNN or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 94x versus Agree Realty Corporation's 113. 70x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 38. 9x for Agree Realty Corporation — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADC: 9. 4% to $83. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FVR or ADC or NNN or O?
In this comparison, NNN (5.
3% yield), O (5. 2% yield), ADC (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. FVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FVR or ADC or NNN or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
14), 4. 0% yield, +135. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADC: +135. 6%, FVR: +4. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FVR and ADC and NNN and O?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. ADC, NNN, O pay a dividend while FVR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.