REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FVR vs SPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
FVR vs SPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $392M | $66.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $6.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | -32.9% | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 49.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $29.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $823M |
FVR vs SPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 121.5 | +21.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FVR vs SPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FVR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 85.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- 12.0% FFO/revenue growth vs SPG's 6.7%
- +54.2% vs SPG's +33.7%
SPG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.61
- 32.3% 10Y total return vs FVR's 0.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% FFO/revenue growth vs SPG's 6.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs FVR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs FVR's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.2% vs SPG's +33.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs FVR's -0.3%, ROIC 7.6% vs 1.3% |
FVR vs SPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FVR vs SPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 92.2x FVR's $69M. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FVR's -4.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $34M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | +85.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +49.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +72.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +49.3% | +35.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +13.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FVR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FVR's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPG's 20.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $392M | $66.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $393M | $96.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.50x | 14.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.84x | 20.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.84x | 10.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 9.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $-1 for FVR. FVR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +68.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 4.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $956,000 | $29.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $823M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $29.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPG five years ago would be worth $19,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,032 for FVR. Over the past 12 months, FVR leads with a +54.2% total return vs SPG's +33.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPG at 28.7% vs FVR's 0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.9% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.2% | +33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | +113.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | +97.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.3% | +32.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.1% | +28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SPG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FVR's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.09 | $208.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.81 | $155.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.7% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 56.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 113K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SPG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FVR as "Buy" and SPG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -0.9% upside for FVR (target: $17) vs -4.1% for SPG (target: $197).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.33 | $197.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SPG leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FVR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FVR vs SPG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FVR or SPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FrontView REIT, Inc.
(FVR) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG). Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FVR or SPG?
Over the past 5 years, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) delivered a total return of +97. 9%, compared to +0. 3% for FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPG returned +32. 3% versus FVR's +0. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FVR or SPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus FrontView REIT, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning FVR is approximately 49% more volatile than SPG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FrontView REIT, Inc. (FVR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FVR or SPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FrontView REIT, Inc.
(FVR) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 6. 7% for Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Simon Property Group, Inc. grew EPS 94. 8% year-over-year, compared to 85. 0% for FrontView REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FVR leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FVR or SPG?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus -5. 7% for FrontView REIT, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPG leads at 49. 9% versus 16. 9% for FVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPG leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FVR or SPG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FVR: -0.
9% to $17. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — FVR or SPG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FVR or SPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPG: +32. 3%, FVR: +0. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FVR and SPG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.