SPG vs MAC

For growth investors, The Macerich Company (MAC) is the stronger pick with 10.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG). Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) a "Hold" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Simon Property Group, Inc.

(SPG) delivered a total return of +98. 5%, compared to +83. 5% for The Macerich Company (MAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPG returned +32. 2% versus MAC's -53. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Simon Property Group, Inc.

(SPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus The Macerich Company's 1. 29β — meaning MAC is approximately 113% more volatile than SPG relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Macerich Company (MAC) is pulling ahead at 10.

4% versus 6. 7% for Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Simon Property Group, Inc. grew EPS 94. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for The Macerich Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPG leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Simon Property Group, Inc.

(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus -19. 4% for The Macerich Company — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAC leads at 67. 8% versus 49. 9% for SPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAC leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAC: -0.

4% to $21. 40.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Simon Property Group, Inc.

(SPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPG: +32. 2%, MAC: -53. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.