G vs CTSH

For growth investors, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the stronger pick with 7.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for Genpact Limited (G). Genpact Limited (G) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genpact Limited (G) a "Hold" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Genpact Limited (G) is the cheapest at 10.

8x versus Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation at 11. 3x. On forward P/E, Genpact Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Genpact Limited wins at 0. 57x versus Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Genpact Limited (G) delivered a total return of -22.

2%, compared to -24. 0% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: G returned +41. 3% versus CTSH's -0. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genpact Limited (G) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

67β versus Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's 0. 75β — meaning CTSH is approximately 12% more volatile than G relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 69% for Genpact Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is pulling ahead at 7.

0% versus 6. 6% for Genpact Limited (G). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genpact Limited grew EPS 9. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 9% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, G leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Genpact Limited (G) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

9% net margin versus 10. 6% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTSH leads at 16. 7% versus 15. 0% for G. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — G leads at 35. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Genpact Limited (G) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 57x versus Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Genpact Limited (G) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 9. 0x for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTSH: 62. 3% to $83. 33.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Genpact Limited (G).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Genpact Limited (G) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

67), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (G: +41. 3%, CTSH: -0. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.