Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
G vs EXLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
G vs EXLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $5.53B | $4.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.16B | $2.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $570M | $252M |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 15.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.76B | $404M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $854M | $146M |
G vs EXLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genpact Limited (G) | 100 | 90.6 | -9.4% |
| ExlService Holdings… (EXLS) | 100 | 254.1 | +154.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: G vs EXLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
G is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 2.0%
- PEG 0.55 vs EXLS's 0.57
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.9x), PEG 0.55 vs 0.57
EXLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 27.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.9%
- 218.8% 10Y total return vs G's 35.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 2.56x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs G's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.9x), PEG 0.55 vs 0.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.7% margin vs G's 11.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs G's 0.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.9% vs EXLS's -31.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs G's 10.3%, ROIC 20.4% vs 17.2% |
G vs EXLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
G vs EXLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXLS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
G is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 2.4x EXLS's $2.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.7% (EXLS) to 11.0% (G). On growth, EXLS holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $819M | $410M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $570M | $252M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $666M | $297M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +38.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +15.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.8% | +7.5% |
Valuation Metrics
G leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, G trades at a 48% valuation discount to EXLS's 20.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), G offers better value at 0.70x vs EXLS's 0.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.5B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.40x | 20.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.09x | 13.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.70x | 0.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.53x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.26x | 5.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.52x | 16.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXLS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXLS delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $22 for G. EXLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to G's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXLS scores 7/9 vs G's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.4% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.3% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.2% | +20.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.4% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $911M | $257M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $854M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $404M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.55x | 11.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXLS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXLS five years ago would be worth $15,849 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,553 for G. Over the past 12 months, G leads with a -20.9% total return vs EXLS's -31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXLS at 1.1% vs G's -4.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.7% | -24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.9% | -31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.3% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.5% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.4% | +218.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.3% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — G and EXLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than G's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.64 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.47 | $26.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.9% | +64.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
G leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates G as "Hold" and EXLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.6% upside for G (target: $44) vs 29.5% for EXLS (target: $40). G is the only dividend payer here at 2.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.50 | $40.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.67 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | +6.8% |
EXLS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). G leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
G vs EXLS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is G or EXLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for Genpact Limited (G). Genpact Limited (G) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — G or EXLS?
On trailing P/E, Genpact Limited (G) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. at 20. 2x. On forward P/E, Genpact Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Genpact Limited wins at 0. 55x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — G or EXLS?
Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) delivered a total return of +58. 5%, compared to -24. 5% for Genpact Limited (G). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +218. 8% versus G's +35. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — G or EXLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Genpact Limited's 0. 69β — meaning G is approximately 7% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 69% for Genpact Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — G or EXLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus 6. 6% for Genpact Limited (G). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ExlService Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 27. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 8% for Genpact Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXLS leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — G or EXLS?
ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus 10. 9% for Genpact Limited — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXLS leads at 15. 0% versus 15. 0% for G. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXLS leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is G or EXLS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Genpact Limited (G) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 55x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Genpact Limited (G) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for G: 33. 6% to $43. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — G or EXLS?
In this comparison, G (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. EXLS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is G or EXLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genpact Limited (G) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (G: +35. 4%, EXLS: +218. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between G and EXLS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: G is a small-cap deep-value stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. G pays a dividend while EXLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.