Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GALT vs HALO vs AKBA vs MDGL vs ELVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
GALT vs HALO vs AKBA vs MDGL vs ELVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $136M | $7.68B | $317M | $12.27B | $2.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.40B | $232M | $1.13B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $317M | $-21M | $-309M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.9% | 81.0% | 93.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 58.4% | 2.3% | -27.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.1x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $106M | $0.00 | $216M | $354M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $134M | $185M | $199M | $99M |
GALT vs HALO vs AKBA vs MDGL vs ELVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galectin Therapeuti… (GALT) | 100 | 69.6 | -30.4% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
| Akebia Therapeutics… (AKBA) | 100 | 10.1 | -89.9% |
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 461.0 | +361.0% |
| Enliven Therapeutic… (ELVN) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GALT vs HALO vs AKBA vs MDGL vs ELVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GALT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
- 22.7% margin vs GALT's -29.7%
- Beta 0.56 vs ELVN's 1.27
- 12.5% ROA vs GALT's -290.0%
AKBA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
MDGL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- Rev growth 432.1%, EPS growth 41.3%
- 39.2% 10Y total return vs HALO's 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 4.01x
ELVN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +120.5% vs AKBA's -52.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs GALT's -59.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.7% margin vs GALT's -29.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs ELVN's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +120.5% vs AKBA's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs GALT's -290.0% |
GALT vs HALO vs AKBA vs MDGL vs ELVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GALT vs HALO vs AKBA vs MDGL vs ELVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories
AKBA leads 1 • MDGL leads 1 • GALT leads 0 • ELVN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO and ELVN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDGL's -27.3%. On growth, MDGL holds the edge at +126.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.4B | $232M | $1.1B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $945M | $6M | -$312M | -$119M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $317M | -$21M | -$309M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | $645M | $60M | -$272M | -$70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +81.9% | +81.0% | +93.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +58.4% | +2.3% | -27.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +22.7% | -8.8% | -27.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +46.2% | +25.8% | -24.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +51.6% | -6.6% | +126.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.8% | -2.1% | -2.2% | +2.1% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AKBA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AKBA's 14.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $136M | $7.7B | $317M | $12.3B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $227M | $7.5B | $348M | $12.4B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.78x | 25.46x | -56.73x | -41.62x | -22.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.09x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.11x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.34x | 14.05x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.50x | 1.34x | 12.80x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 165.47x | 9.31x | 19.91x | 4.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.91x | 4.66x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-63 for AKBA. MDGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AKBA's 6.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HALO scores 5/9 vs GALT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.5% | -62.7% | -50.2% | -24.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.9% | +12.5% | -5.7% | -25.4% | -23.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +73.4% | +23.2% | -29.4% | -32.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +38.2% | +13.3% | -32.9% | -31.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 6.63x | 0.59x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $91M | -$134M | $31M | $156M | -$99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $134M | $185M | $199M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106M | $0 | $216M | $354M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.24x | 46.08x | 0.56x | -17.51x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HALO and MDGL and ELVN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MDGL five years ago would be worth $41,011 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,782 for AKBA. Over the past 12 months, ELVN leads with a +120.5% total return vs AKBA's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs AKBA's 3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.9% | -7.3% | -23.9% | -9.9% | +159.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.4% | -7.1% | -52.0% | +79.0% | +120.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +115.3% | +11.3% | +73.2% | +110.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.2% | +37.0% | -62.2% | +310.1% | +38.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.4% | +570.7% | -85.7% | +3921.5% | -32.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.9% | +29.1% | +3.6% | +20.1% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HALO and MDGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELVN's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDGL currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs AKBA's 28.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.56x | 1.14x | 0.57x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.13 | $82.22 | $4.08 | $615.00 | $48.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.21 | $47.50 | $1.13 | $265.00 | $14.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.6% | +79.3% | +28.9% | +87.0% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 52.4 | 55.9 | 61.2 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 347K | 1.4M | 2.8M | 310K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
MDGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GALT as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", AKBA as "Buy", MDGL as "Buy", ELVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 421.3% upside for GALT (target: $11) vs 7.5% for ELVN (target: $43).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $78.33 | $4.00 | $705.67 | $43.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 27 | 11 | 23 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AKBA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GALT vs HALO vs AKBA vs MDGL vs ELVN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GALT or HALO or AKBA or MDGL or ELVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger pick with 432. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 37. 6% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Galectin Therapeutics Inc. (GALT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GALT or HALO or AKBA or MDGL or ELVN?
Over the past 5 years, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) delivered a total return of +310. 1%, compared to -62. 2% for Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. (AKBA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +39. 2% versus AKBA's -85. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GALT or HALO or AKBA or MDGL or ELVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Enliven Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning ELVN is approximately 128% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MDGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 7% for Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GALT or HALO or AKBA or MDGL or ELVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is pulling ahead at 432. 1% versus 37. 6% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 93. 7% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HALO leads at 28. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GALT or HALO or AKBA or MDGL or ELVN?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -30. 1% for Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -31. 3% for MDGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDGL leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GALT or HALO or AKBA or MDGL or ELVN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GALT: 421.
3% to $11. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — GALT or HALO or AKBA or MDGL or ELVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is GALT or HALO or AKBA or MDGL or ELVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, ELVN: -32. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GALT and HALO and AKBA and MDGL and ELVN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GALT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; AKBA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ELVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.