Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GAMB vs RILY vs GENI vs ACMR vs MPWR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GAMB
Gambling.com Group Limited

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$155M
5Y Perf.-36.9%
RILY
BRC Group Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Conglomerates

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$305M
5Y Perf.-87.1%
GENI
Genius Sports Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.-72.2%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+91.3%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$77.41B
5Y Perf.+250.8%

GAMB vs RILY vs GENI vs ACMR vs MPWR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GAMB logoGAMB
RILY logoRILY
GENI logoGENI
ACMR logoACMR
MPWR logoMPWR
IndustryGambling, Resorts & CasinosFinancial - ConglomeratesInternet Content & InformationSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$155M$305M$1.17B$3.92B$77.41B
Revenue (TTM)$155M$1.03B$669M$901M$2.79B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$531M$-112M$94M$616M
Gross Margin93.2%65.0%22.9%44.4%55.2%
Operating Margin2.6%14.6%-18.1%12.1%26.1%
Forward P/E8.6x1.1x52.4x29.7x73.1x
Total Debt$28M$1.47B$30M$303M$24M
Cash & Equiv.$14M$227M$281M$766M$1.10B

GAMB vs RILY vs GENI vs ACMR vs MPWRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GAMB
RILY
GENI
ACMR
MPWR
StockJul 21May 26Return
Gambling.com Group … (GAMB)10063.1-36.9%
BRC Group Holdings,… (RILY)10012.9-87.1%
Genius Sports Limit… (GENI)10027.8-72.2%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100191.3+91.3%
Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR)100350.8+250.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GAMB vs RILY vs GENI vs ACMR vs MPWR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RILY leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Gambling.com Group Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. GENI and MPWR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GAMB
Gambling.com Group Limited
The Growth Play

GAMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 17.1%, EPS growth 78.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 44.3%
  • Beta 1.38 vs ACMR's 3.24
Best for: growth exposure
RILY
BRC Group Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RILY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (1.1x vs 73.1x)
  • 29.8% margin vs GENI's -16.7%
  • +210.4% vs GAMB's -66.9%
  • 31.3% ROA vs GENI's -11.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -16.6%
Best for: value and quality
GENI
Genius Sports Limited
The Defensive Pick

GENI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.56x
  • 31.0% revenue growth vs RILY's -11.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 24.9%
  • PEG 0.84 vs MPWR's 2.48
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

MPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28, yield 0.4%
  • Beta 2.28, yield 0.4%, current ratio 5.91x
  • 0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGENI logoGENI31.0% revenue growth vs RILY's -11.5%
ValueRILY logoRILYLower P/E (1.1x vs 73.1x)
Quality / MarginsRILY logoRILY29.8% margin vs GENI's -16.7%
Stability / SafetyGAMB logoGAMBBeta 1.38 vs ACMR's 3.24
DividendsMPWR logoMPWR0.4% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RILY logoRILY+210.4% vs GAMB's -66.9%
Efficiency (ROA)RILY logoRILY31.3% ROA vs GENI's -11.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs -16.6%

GAMB vs RILY vs GENI vs ACMR vs MPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GAMBGambling.com Group Limited
FY 2024
Casino Revenue
72.5%$92M
Sports
26.2%$33M
Other Product Type Revenue
1.3%$2M
RILYBRC Group Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription Services
24.8%$241M
Sale Of Goods
19.7%$191M
Wealth And Asset Management Fees
13.8%$134M
Corporate Finance Consulting And Investment Banking Fees
13.5%$131M
Trading (Loss) Income
12.9%$126M
Advertising Licensing And Other
6.6%$64M
Other Segments
3.7%$36M
Other (4)
5.0%$49M
GENIGenius Sports Limited
FY 2025
Betting Technology Content And Services
70.4%$472M
Media Technology Content And Services
21.6%$144M
Sports Technology And Services
8.0%$53M
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.
FY 2023
DC To DC Products
94.4%$1.7B
Lighting Control Products
5.6%$102M

GAMB vs RILY vs GENI vs ACMR vs MPWR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPWRLAGGINGGENI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — GAMB and RILY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 18.1x GAMB's $155M. RILY is the more profitable business, keeping 29.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GENI's -16.7%. On growth, GENI holds the edge at +37.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…RILY logoRILYBRC Group Holding…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$155M$1.0B$669M$901M$2.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$20M$390M-$50M$126M$781M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$531M-$112M$94M$616M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$39M$180M$37M-$69M$664M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.2%+65.0%+22.9%+44.4%+55.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.6%+14.6%-18.1%+12.1%+26.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.2%+29.8%-16.7%+10.4%+22.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.3%-6.9%+5.5%-7.6%+23.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.4%+37.0%+9.4%+20.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-145.8%+100.0%+33.8%-76.1%-88.4%
Evenly matched — GAMB and RILY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GAMB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 1.1x trailing earnings, RILY trades at a 99% valuation discount to MPWR's 123.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.22x vs MPWR's 4.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…RILY logoRILYBRC Group Holding…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Market CapShares × price$155M$305M$1.2B$3.9B$77.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$170M$1.5B$924M$3.5B$76.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.26x1.14x-10.83x43.21x123.60x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.63x52.42x29.68x73.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x4.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.09x8.33x27.49x97.90x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.22x0.30x1.75x4.35x27.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.30x1.68x2.06x21.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.77x18.18x116.20x
GAMB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-16 for GENI. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GAMB's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GAMB scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…RILY logoRILYBRC Group Holding…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.4%-15.5%+6.1%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+31.3%-11.1%+3.9%+15.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+23.0%+8.3%-16.6%+7.0%+22.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.3%+10.2%-15.3%+6.6%+20.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974326
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.04x0.16x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$14M$1.2B-$250M-$463M-$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$14M$227M$281M$766M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$28M$1.5B$30M$303M$24M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.79x10.78x-136.57x20.44x
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,536 for GENI. Over the past 12 months, RILY leads with a +210.4% total return vs GAMB's -66.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs RILY's -29.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…RILY logoRILYBRC Group Holding…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-16.4%+67.8%-55.8%+31.9%+68.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-66.9%+210.4%-53.1%+195.6%+148.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-55.6%-65.6%+17.4%+487.9%+280.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.8%-64.6%-74.6%+133.4%+366.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.7%+239.7%-52.4%+3065.8%+2494.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-23.7%-29.9%+5.5%+80.5%+56.1%
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GAMB and MPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GAMB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MPWR currently trades 94.8% from its 52-week high vs GAMB's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…RILY logoRILYBRC Group Holding…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.38x2.03x1.50x3.24x2.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.95$10.97$13.73$71.65$1662.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.51$2.75$3.83$19.26$613.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+29.6%+79.2%+34.7%+82.6%+94.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.465.845.360.771.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded559K820K5.6M1.2M577K
Evenly matched — GAMB and MPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GAMB as "Buy", RILY as "Hold", GENI as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.9% upside for GENI (target: $12) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, MPWR offers the higher dividend yield at 0.37% vs ACMR's 0.19%.

MetricGAMB logoGAMBGambling.com Grou…RILY logoRILYBRC Group Holding…GENI logoGENIGenius Sports Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$12.10$40.00$1615.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts81191025
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0138
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11$5.90
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+17.4%0.0%0.0%+0.2%+0.0%
MPWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). GAMB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallMonolithic Power Systems, I… (MPWR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GAMB vs RILY vs GENI vs ACMR vs MPWR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 5% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR?

On trailing P/E, BRC Group Holdings, Inc.

(RILY) is the cheapest at 1. 1x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. at 123. 6x. On forward P/E, Gambling. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ACM Research, Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR?

Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -74. 6% for Genius Sports Limited (GENI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus GENI's -52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 38β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 135% more volatile than GAMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for Gambling. com Group Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.

0% versus -11. 5% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BRC Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 129. 9% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GAMB leads at 44. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR?

BRC Group Holdings, Inc.

(RILY) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 8% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 29. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAMB leads at 28. 1% versus -15. 6% for GENI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GAMB leads at 94. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Gambling. com Group Limited (GAMB) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 73. 1x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 64. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $12. 10.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR?

In this comparison, MPWR (0.

4% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GAMB, RILY, GENI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GAMB or RILY or GENI or ACMR or MPWR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Gambling.

com Group Limited (GAMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAMB: -44. 7%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GAMB and RILY and GENI and ACMR and MPWR?

These companies operate in different sectors (GAMB (Consumer Cyclical) and RILY (Financial Services) and GENI (Communication Services) and ACMR (Technology) and MPWR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GAMB is a small-cap high-growth stock; RILY is a small-cap deep-value stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GAMB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RILY

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GENI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MPWR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GAMB and RILY and GENI and ACMR and MPWR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GAMB: 21.4% · RILY: -11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GAMB: 5.3x · RILY: 1.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.