Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GANX vs ACMR vs PRAX vs ICHR vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Biotechnology
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
GANX vs ACMR vs PRAX vs ICHR vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Semiconductors | Biotechnology | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $67M | $3.92B | $9.63B | $2.47B | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $901M | $-92K | $959M | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $94M | $-327M | $-51M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.4% | — | 11.3% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 12.1% | — | -3.8% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.7x | — | 62.2x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $653K | $303M | $110K | $186M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $766M | $357M | $98M | $675M |
GANX vs ACMR vs PRAX vs ICHR vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gain Therapeutics, … (GANX) | 100 | 12.5 | -87.5% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 219.8 | +119.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 132.4 | +32.4% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 162.2 | +62.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GANX vs ACMR vs PRAX vs ICHR vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GANX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 1.46 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
- 15.2% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (29.7x vs 30.4x)
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- Beta 1.55, current ratio 10.22x
- +7.7% vs GANX's -4.1%
Among these 5 stocks, ICHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MKSI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.7x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.46 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs GANX's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs GANX's -176.7% |
GANX vs ACMR vs PRAX vs ICHR vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GANX vs ACMR vs PRAX vs ICHR vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MKSI leads in 1 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • GANX leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $4.1B and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $901M | -$92,000 | $959M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $126M | -$357M | -$11M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $94M | -$327M | -$51M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$69M | -$283M | -$17M | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +44.4% | — | +11.3% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +12.1% | — | -3.8% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.4% | — | -5.3% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -7.6% | — | -1.7% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.4% | — | +4.7% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | -76.1% | +2.7% | +46.2% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ACMR and ICHR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 37% valuation discount to MKSI's 68.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKSI's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67M | $3.9B | $9.6B | $2.5B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $3.5B | $9.3B | $2.6B | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.10x | 43.21x | -24.72x | -46.25x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.68x | — | 62.25x | 30.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.49x | — | — | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.35x | — | 2.61x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.83x | 2.06x | 8.54x | 3.67x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GANX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | +6.1% | -43.0% | -7.5% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -176.7% | +3.9% | -40.2% | -5.2% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.0% | -65.0% | -3.9% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -186.1% | +6.6% | -49.3% | -4.7% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.16x | 0.00x | 0.28x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$463M | -$357M | $87M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $766M | $357M | $98M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $653,015 | $303M | $110,000 | $186M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 20.44x | — | -5.97x | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,781 for GANX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs GANX's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs GANX's -29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.2% | +31.9% | +16.4% | +249.0% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.1% | +195.6% | +775.0% | +329.1% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | +487.9% | +1976.5% | +151.1% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | +133.4% | -20.8% | +28.9% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +3065.8% | -20.1% | +629.1% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.4% | +80.5% | +174.9% | +35.9% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GANX and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GANX is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs GANX's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 3.24x | 1.55x | 3.93x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.34 | $71.65 | $356.00 | $72.87 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.41 | $19.26 | $35.18 | $13.12 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.1% | +82.6% | +93.6% | +97.7% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 60.7 | 55.6 | 66.9 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 640K | 1.2M | 378K | 795K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GANX as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 345.5% upside for GANX (target: $8) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.33 | $40.00 | $544.40 | $49.80 | $272.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 10 | 16 | 14 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | — | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
MKSI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ACMR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GANX vs ACMR vs PRAX vs ICHR vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (GANX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus MKS Inc. at 68. 8x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -82. 2% for Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (GANX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus GANX's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gain Therapeutics, Inc.
(GANX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 169% more volatile than GANX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACMR leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 32. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GANX: 345. 5% to $8. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GANX, PRAX, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GANX or ACMR or PRAX or ICHR or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+750. 6% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MKSI: +750. 6%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GANX and ACMR and PRAX and ICHR and MKSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (GANX (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and PRAX (Healthcare) and ICHR (Technology) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GANX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.