Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GANX vs LGND vs RARE vs FOLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
GANX vs LGND vs RARE vs FOLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $67M | $4.13B | $2.57B | $4.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $251M | $669M | $634M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $49M | $-609M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | — | 85.9% | 83.6% | 87.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.0% | -83.9% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.6x | — | 40.6x |
| Total Debt | $653K | $7M | $1.28B | $483M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $72M | $434M | $214M |
GANX vs LGND vs RARE vs FOLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gain Therapeutics, … (GANX) | 100 | 12.5 | -87.5% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 138.0 | +38.0% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 22.9 | -77.1% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 146.4 | +46.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GANX vs LGND vs RARE vs FOLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GANX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
LGND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 8.93x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 8.93x
- 27.3% revenue growth vs GANX's -100.0%
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 51.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.4%
- 119.2% 10Y total return vs LGND's 73.0%
- Beta 0.63 vs GANX's 1.46
- +137.9% vs RARE's -21.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.3% revenue growth vs GANX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.6x vs 40.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs GANX's 1.46 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.9% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs GANX's -176.7% |
GANX vs LGND vs RARE vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GANX vs LGND vs RARE vs FOLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LGND leads in 4 of 6 categories
FOLD leads 1 • GANX leads 0 • RARE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGND leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and GANX operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue. LGND is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +122.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $251M | $669M | $634M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $52M | -$536M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $49M | -$609M | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | $31M | -$487M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +85.9% | +83.6% | +87.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.0% | -83.9% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +19.3% | -91.0% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +12.2% | -72.8% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +122.8% | -2.4% | +23.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | +15.6% | -17.2% | -89.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LGND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FOLD's 114.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 322.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67M | $4.1B | $2.6B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58M | $4.1B | $3.4B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.10x | -956.05x | -4.48x | -164.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.65x | — | 40.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 322.10x | — | 114.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 24.74x | 3.82x | 7.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.83x | 4.63x | — | 16.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.41x | — | 152.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LGND leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LGND delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LGND scores 5/9 vs GANX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | +5.1% | -6.1% | -12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -176.7% | +3.3% | -45.8% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -2.3% | -89.4% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -186.1% | -2.7% | -46.4% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.01x | — | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$65M | $842M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $72M | $434M | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $653,015 | $7M | $1.3B | $483M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 22.69x | -14.49x | 1.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $16,102 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,781 for GANX. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGND at 39.5% vs GANX's -29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.2% | +10.6% | +10.7% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.1% | +99.1% | -21.8% | +137.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.8% | +171.6% | -44.5% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | +61.0% | -77.2% | +48.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +73.0% | -59.4% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.4% | +39.5% | -17.8% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GANX's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs GANX's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.99x | 1.42x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.34 | $247.38 | $42.37 | $14.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.41 | $98.89 | $18.29 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.1% | +85.0% | +61.7% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 59.3 | 66.6 | 72.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 640K | 226K | 1.8M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GANX as "Buy", LGND as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 345.5% upside for GANX (target: $8) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.33 | $267.75 | $51.50 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 17 | 33 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LGND leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FOLD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
GANX vs LGND vs RARE vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GANX or LGND or RARE or FOLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger pick with 27.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (GANX). Analysts rate Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (GANX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GANX or LGND or RARE or FOLD?
Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +61.
0%, compared to -82. 2% for Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (GANX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +119. 2% versus GANX's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GANX or LGND or RARE or FOLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Gain Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning GANX is approximately 131% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GANX or LGND or RARE or FOLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is pulling ahead at 27.
3% versus -100. 0% for Gain Therapeutics, Inc. (GANX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -107. 5% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOLD leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GANX or LGND or RARE or FOLD?
Gain Therapeutics, Inc.
(GANX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOLD leads at 5. 4% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGND leads at 93. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GANX or LGND or RARE or FOLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) trades at 23.
6x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 17. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GANX: 345. 5% to $8. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — GANX or LGND or RARE or FOLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is GANX or LGND or RARE or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, GANX: -83. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GANX and LGND and RARE and FOLD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GANX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.