Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GAU vs TRX vs GORO vs SBSW vs NEM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GAU
Galiano Gold Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$655M
5Y Perf.+113.6%
TRX
TRX Gold Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$355M
5Y Perf.+44.7%
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$231M
5Y Perf.-63.3%
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • ZA
Market Cap$9.33B
5Y Perf.+79.7%
NEM
Newmont Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$125.72B
5Y Perf.+94.1%

GAU vs TRX vs GORO vs SBSW vs NEM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GAU logoGAU
TRX logoTRX
GORO logoGORO
SBSW logoSBSW
NEM logoNEM
IndustryGoldGoldGoldGoldGold
Market Cap$655M$355M$231M$9.33B$125.72B
Revenue (TTM)$353M$98M$93M$238.26B$17.23B
Net Income (TTM)$-45M$-6M$-6M$-12.39B$5.26B
Gross Margin34.7%47.1%18.9%21.2%52.1%
Operating Margin26.0%35.2%13.1%18.9%49.3%
Forward P/E4.1x70.3x28.6x0.2x10.9x
Total Debt$39M$5M$91M$44.34B$474M
Cash & Equiv.$106M$15M$25M$17.16B$7.65B

GAU vs TRX vs GORO vs SBSW vs NEMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GAU
TRX
GORO
SBSW
NEM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU)100213.6+113.6%
TRX Gold Corporation (TRX)100144.7+44.7%
Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO)10036.7-63.3%
Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW)100179.7+79.7%
Newmont Corporation (NEM)100194.1+94.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GAU vs TRX vs GORO vs SBSW vs NEM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NEM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Galiano Gold Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. TRX, GORO, and SBSW also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GAU
Galiano Gold Inc.
The Growth Leader

GAU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 111.4% revenue growth vs SBSW's 7.1%
Best for: growth
TRX
TRX Gold Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

TRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 164.5% 10Y total return vs NEM's 293.1%
  • +289.2% vs GAU's +60.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation
The Growth Play

GORO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 44.0%, EPS growth 92.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.38, current ratio 2.85x
  • Beta 0.38 vs TRX's 1.79
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Value Play

SBSW is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (0.2x vs 28.6x)
Best for: value
NEM
Newmont Corporation
The Income Pick

NEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
  • Beta 0.75, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.72x
  • 30.5% margin vs GAU's -12.8%
  • 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBSW's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGAU logoGAU111.4% revenue growth vs SBSW's 7.1%
ValueSBSW logoSBSWLower P/E (0.2x vs 28.6x)
Quality / MarginsNEM logoNEM30.5% margin vs GAU's -12.8%
Stability / SafetyGORO logoGOROBeta 0.38 vs TRX's 1.79
DividendsNEM logoNEM0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SBSW's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TRX logoTRX+289.2% vs GAU's +60.5%
Efficiency (ROA)NEM logoNEM9.4% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs 22.9%

GAU vs TRX vs GORO vs SBSW vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GAUGaliano Gold Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TRXTRX Gold Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

GOROGold Resource Corporation
FY 2025
Concentrate
48.4%$92M
Silver Concentrate
34.8%$66M
Gold Concentrate
8.7%$17M
Zinc Concentrate
4.4%$8M
Copper Concentrate
1.3%$2M
Lead Concentrate
1.0%$2M
Dore
0.7%$1M
Other (2)
0.7%$1M
SBSWSibanye Stillwater Limited
FY 2024
Pgm Mining Activities
35.7%$59.5B
Gold Mining Activities
22.3%$37.1B
Platinum Mining Activities
12.3%$20.6B
Palladium Mining Activities
11.9%$19.9B
Rhodium Mining Activities
8.8%$14.7B
Chrome Mining Activities
3.6%$6.1B
Nickel Mining Activities
2.2%$3.6B
Other (3)
3.2%$5.3B
NEMNewmont Corporation
FY 2025
Gold Dore
63.2%$14.3B
Sales From Concentrate And Other Production
36.8%$8.3B

GAU vs TRX vs GORO vs SBSW vs NEM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNEMLAGGINGGORO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SBSW is the larger business by revenue, generating $238.3B annually — 2554.9x GORO's $93M. NEM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GAU's -12.8%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGAU logoGAUGaliano Gold Inc.TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$353M$98M$93M$238.3B$17.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$142M$40M$25M$63.5B$12.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$45M-$6M-$6M-$12.4B$5.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$8M$6M-$4M-$9.5B$12.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.7%+47.1%+18.9%+21.2%+52.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+35.2%+13.1%+18.9%+49.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-12.8%-6.5%-6.9%-5.2%+30.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.3%+6.0%-4.2%-4.0%+75.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.5%+103.5%+2.5%+25.4%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+193.3%-10.0%-100.0%
NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SBSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.7x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 83% valuation discount to GAU's 105.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SBSW's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRX's 17.5x.

MetricGAU logoGAUGaliano Gold Inc.TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$655M$355M$231M$9.3B$125.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$588M$348M$297M$11.0B$118.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS105.44x-30.43x-31.78x17.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.12x70.29x28.60x0.25x10.89x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.01x17.54x11.93x5.67x9.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.83x6.11x2.48x1.27x5.69x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.60x3.54x4.46x3.47x3.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF187.70x359.20x90.73x17.22x
SBSW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NEM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

NEM delivers a 15.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-28 for SBSW. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs TRX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGAU logoGAUGaliano Gold Inc.TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-22.4%-6.1%-22.7%-28.1%+15.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.7%-3.5%-4.0%-8.3%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.8%+15.5%+13.5%+22.9%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.8%+15.3%+8.2%+19.1%+20.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955769
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.04x2.07x1.00x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$67M-$9M$66M$27.2B-$7.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$106M$15M$25M$17.2B$7.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$39M$5M$91M$44.3B$474M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.54x8.73x0.73x1.31x50.54x
NEM leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — GAU and TRX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TRX five years ago would be worth $21,964 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,415 for GORO. Over the past 12 months, TRX leads with a +289.2% total return vs GAU's +60.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GAU at 51.8% vs SBSW's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGAU logoGAUGaliano Gold Inc.TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.6%+36.7%+70.2%-6.5%+12.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+60.5%+289.2%+143.4%+167.2%+112.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+250.0%+110.8%+50.5%+40.9%+142.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.3%+119.6%-45.8%-19.9%+80.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.9%+164.5%-47.8%+30.7%+293.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+51.8%+28.2%+14.6%+12.1%+34.3%
Evenly matched — GAU and TRX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GORO and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GORO is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEM currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs TRX's 43.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGAU logoGAUGaliano Gold Inc.TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.03x1.79x0.38x1.27x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.62$2.80$1.87$21.29$134.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.19$0.30$0.43$4.52$48.27
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.6%+43.9%+76.5%+62.0%+84.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.945.147.957.053.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.3M4.4M1.8M5.7M9.2M
Evenly matched — GORO and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GAU as "Hold", TRX as "Buy", GORO as "Buy", SBSW as "Hold", NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.7% upside for GAU (target: $4) vs 21.2% for NEM (target: $138). For income investors, NEM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.88% vs SBSW's 0.18%.

MetricGAU logoGAUGaliano Gold Inc.TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…GORO logoGOROGold Resource Cor…SBSW logoSBSWSibanye Stillwate…NEM logoNEMNewmont Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.25$1.88$2.00$18.27$137.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts7141236
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%+1.8%
NEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NEM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBSW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNewmont Corporation (NEM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GAU vs TRX vs GORO vs SBSW vs NEM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the stronger pick with 44.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM?

On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 17.

7x versus Galiano Gold Inc. at 105. 4x. On forward P/E, Sibanye Stillwater Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM?

Over the past 5 years, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) delivered a total return of +119.

6%, compared to -45. 8% for Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEM returned +293. 1% versus GORO's -47. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus TRX Gold Corporation's 1. 79β — meaning TRX is approximately 377% more volatile than GORO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is pulling ahead at 44.

0% versus 7. 1% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to -80. 1% for Galiano Gold Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRX leads at 60. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM?

Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

1% net margin versus -6. 9% for Gold Resource Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 13. 1% for GORO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEM leads at 49. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) trades at 0.

2x forward P/E versus 70. 3x for TRX Gold Corporation — 70. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GAU: 68. 7% to $4. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM?

In this comparison, NEM (0.

9% yield), SBSW (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GAU, TRX, GORO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GAU or TRX or GORO or SBSW or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

75), 0. 9% yield, +293. 1% 10Y return). TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +293. 1%, TRX: +164. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GAU and TRX and GORO and SBSW and NEM?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GAU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock; SBSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NEM pays a dividend while GAU, TRX, GORO, SBSW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GAU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 30%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 51%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GORO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 122%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBSW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NEM

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GAU and TRX and GORO and SBSW and NEM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GAU: 60.5% · TRX: 103.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.