Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GCTS vs MTSI vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GCTS
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.-89.9%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$25.84B
5Y Perf.+270.6%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$138.57B
5Y Perf.+165.3%
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.78B
5Y Perf.-42.1%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.96T
5Y Perf.+269.6%

GCTS vs MTSI vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GCTS logoGCTS
MTSI logoMTSI
MRVL logoMRVL
SWKS logoSWKS
AVGO logoAVGO
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$85M$25.84B$138.57B$9.78B$1.96T
Revenue (TTM)$4M$1.07B$8.19B$4.04B$68.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-39M$177M$2.67B$361M$24.97B
Gross Margin-0.2%55.3%51.0%41.1%67.1%
Operating Margin-8.2%16.0%16.1%9.4%40.9%
Forward P/E76.9x41.7x13.8x36.5x
Total Debt$43M$538M$4.47B$1.20B$65.14B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$112M$2.64B$1.16B$16.18B

GCTS vs MTSI vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GCTS
MTSI
MRVL
SWKS
AVGO
StockDec 23May 26Return
GCT Semiconductor H… (GCTS)10010.1-89.9%
MACOM Technology So… (MTSI)100370.6+270.6%
Marvell Technology,… (MRVL)100265.3+165.3%
Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS)10057.9-42.1%
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO)100369.6+269.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GCTS vs MTSI vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SWKS and AVGO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Broadcom Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. GCTS, MTSI, and MRVL also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GCTS
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

GCTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 1.03 vs MRVL's 2.21
Best for: stability
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

MTSI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +203.8% vs SWKS's +1.5%
Best for: momentum
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
The Growth Play

MRVL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
  • 42.1% revenue growth vs GCTS's -43.0%
Best for: growth exposure
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick

SWKS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 4.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 20.9%, current ratio 2.33x
  • Beta 1.36, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.33x
  • Lower P/E (13.8x vs 36.5x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AVGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 29.0% 10Y total return vs MRVL's 15.8%
  • 36.6% margin vs GCTS's -10.1%
  • 14.9% ROA vs GCTS's -162.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMRVL logoMRVL42.1% revenue growth vs GCTS's -43.0%
ValueSWKS logoSWKSLower P/E (13.8x vs 36.5x)
Quality / MarginsAVGO logoAVGO36.6% margin vs GCTS's -10.1%
Stability / SafetyGCTS logoGCTSBeta 1.03 vs MRVL's 2.21
DividendsSWKS logoSWKS4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs AVGO's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MTSI logoMTSI+203.8% vs SWKS's +1.5%
Efficiency (ROA)AVGO logoAVGO14.9% ROA vs GCTS's -162.0%

GCTS vs MTSI vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GCTSGCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MRVLMarvell Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
Data Center
72.2%$4.2B
Enterprise Networking
10.9%$626M
Carrier Infrastructure
5.9%$338M
Automotive And Industrial
5.6%$322M
Consumer
5.5%$316M
SWKSSkyworks Solutions, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AVGOBroadcom Inc.
FY 2025
Semiconductor Solutions
57.7%$36.9B
Infrastructure Software
42.3%$27.0B

GCTS vs MTSI vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAVGOLAGGINGMRVL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $68.3B annually — 17539.7x GCTS's $4M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GCTS's -10.1%. On growth, AVGO holds the edge at +29.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGCTS logoGCTSGCT Semiconductor…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4M$1.1B$8.2B$4.0B$68.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M$210M$2.3B$842M$38.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$39M$177M$2.7B$361M$25.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M$168M$1.4B$697M$28.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-0.2%+55.3%+51.0%+41.1%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.2%+16.0%+16.1%+9.4%+40.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.1%+16.5%+32.6%+8.9%+36.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.0%+15.6%+17.0%+17.2%+42.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-83.5%+22.5%+22.1%-1.0%+29.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-56.3%+42.9%+100.0%-44.2%+31.6%
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 76% valuation discount to AVGO's 86.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 136.1x.

MetricGCTS logoGCTSGCT Semiconductor…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
Market CapShares × price$85M$25.8B$138.6B$9.8B$1.96T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$127M$26.3B$140.4B$9.8B$2.00T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.56x-471.88x52.12x21.12x86.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.76.91x41.72x13.79x36.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.73x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple136.13x106.14x10.20x58.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.28x26.71x16.91x2.39x30.62x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share19.20x9.73x1.75x24.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF134.01x99.24x8.85x72.67x
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AVGO delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $6 for SWKS. SWKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs GCTS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGCTS logoGCTSGCT Semiconductor…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.2%+19.4%+6.3%+32.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-162.0%+8.6%+12.6%+4.6%+14.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.0%+6.0%+6.3%+14.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.6%+7.1%+7.0%+16.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945758
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.31x0.21x0.80x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$42M$426M$1.8B$42M$49.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$112M$2.6B$1.2B$16.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$43M$538M$4.5B$1.2B$65.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.17x391.47x15.17x14.46x9.24x
AVGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $93,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,009 for GCTS. Over the past 12 months, MTSI leads with a +203.8% total return vs SWKS's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 88.2% vs GCTS's -53.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGCTS logoGCTSGCT Semiconductor…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.0%+96.9%+79.1%+2.1%+18.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+4.9%+203.8%+184.6%+1.5%+102.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.9%+526.9%+291.9%-30.3%+566.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.9%+513.6%+250.8%-55.5%+833.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.9%+795.9%+1581.3%+31.2%+2897.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-53.4%+84.4%+57.7%-11.4%+88.2%
AVGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GCTS and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GCTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs GCTS's 60.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGCTS logoGCTSGCT Semiconductor…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.03x1.75x2.21x1.36x1.96x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.47$355.00$175.79$90.90$437.68
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.90$110.09$53.78$51.92$198.43
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+60.7%+97.0%+91.0%+71.6%+94.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.771.378.555.968.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M1.1M24.8M3.3M23.3M
Evenly matched — GCTS and MTSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SWKS and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: MTSI as "Buy", MRVL as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for AVGO (target: $444) vs -26.3% for MTSI (target: $254). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs MRVL's 0.15%.

MetricGCTS logoGCTSGCT Semiconductor…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…AVGO logoAVGOBroadcom Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$254.00$129.52$62.75$443.72
# AnalystsCovering analysts23725958
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+4.3%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001216
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.24$2.79$2.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%+1.5%+0.5%+0.3%
Evenly matched — SWKS and AVGO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AVGO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallBroadcom Inc. (AVGO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GCTS vs MTSI vs MRVL vs SWKS vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.

(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 0% for GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?

On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Broadcom Inc. at 86. 5x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?

Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc.

(AVGO) delivered a total return of +833. 6%, compared to -89. 9% for GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +29. 0% versus GCTS's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc.

(GCTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Marvell Technology, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning MRVL is approximately 115% more volatile than GCTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.

(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus -43. 0% for GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AVGO leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?

Broadcom Inc.

(AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 2% net margin versus -135. 6% for GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39. 9% versus -143. 8% for GCTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVGO leads at 67. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 76. 9x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 63. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVGO: 7. 6% to $443. 72.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO?

In this comparison, SWKS (4.

3% yield), AVGO (0. 6% yield), MRVL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. GCTS, MTSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GCTS or MTSI or MRVL or SWKS or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 3% yield). Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +31. 2%, AVGO: +29. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GCTS and MTSI and MRVL and SWKS and AVGO?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GCTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. SWKS, AVGO pay a dividend while GCTS, MTSI, MRVL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GCTS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MTSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MRVL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SWKS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AVGO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GCTS and MTSI and MRVL and SWKS and AVGO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GCTS: -83.5% · MTSI: 22.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.