Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GDDY vs AKAM vs NET vs GOOGL vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
Software - Infrastructure
GDDY vs AKAM vs NET vs GOOGL vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $11.97B | $17.18B | $90.83B | $4.81T | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.02B | $4.27B | $2.33B | $422.57B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $870M | $435M | $-87M | $160.21B | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 61.8% | 57.2% | 73.5% | 60.4% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 17.6% | 13.7% | -9.1% | 32.7% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 21.5x | 228.9x | 29.6x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $3.86B | $6.91B | $3.70B | $59.29B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.08B | $930M | $944M | $30.71B | $30.24B |
GDDY vs AKAM vs NET vs GOOGL vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) | 100 | 117.8 | +17.8% |
| Akamai Technologies… (AKAM) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) | 100 | 673.6 | +573.6% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 559.0 | +459.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 226.5 | +126.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GDDY vs AKAM vs NET vs GOOGL vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GDDY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and stability.
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 25.3x)
- Beta 0.42 vs NET's 1.53
AKAM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 2.29x
NET is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 13.3% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs AKAM's 5.4%
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- PEG 0.99 vs MSFT's 1.35
- +163.5% vs GDDY's -51.0%
- 27.4% ROA vs NET's -1.5%, ROIC 25.1% vs -4.6%
MSFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs NET's -3.7%
- 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs AKAM's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs NET's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs NET's 1.53 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs GDDY's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs NET's -1.5%, ROIC 25.1% vs -4.6% |
GDDY vs AKAM vs NET vs GOOGL vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GDDY vs AKAM vs NET vs GOOGL vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GDDY leads in 1 of 6 categories
GOOGL leads 1 • NET leads 1 • MSFT leads 1 • AKAM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NET and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 181.5x NET's $2.3B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NET's -3.7%. On growth, NET holds the edge at +33.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $4.3B | $2.3B | $422.6B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $1.1B | $67M | $161.3B | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $870M | $435M | -$87M | $160.2B | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $765M | $365M | $73.3B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.8% | +57.2% | +73.5% | +60.4% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +13.7% | -9.1% | +32.7% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +10.2% | -3.7% | +37.9% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +17.9% | +15.7% | +17.3% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +5.8% | +33.5% | +21.8% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | -13.4% | +36.4% | +81.9% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
GDDY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, GDDY trades at a 62% valuation discount to AKAM's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.0B | $17.2B | $90.8B | $4.81T | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.8B | $23.2B | $93.6B | $4.84T | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.41x | 38.01x | -886.38x | 36.82x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.79x | 21.54x | 228.90x | 29.61x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.23x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.03x | 17.32x | 1062.71x | 32.22x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.42x | 4.08x | 41.90x | 11.95x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 56.82x | 3.45x | 61.38x | 11.72x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.60x | 24.57x | 280.08x | 65.72x | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GDDY delivers a 3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-6 for NET. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GDDY's 17.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs NET's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +9.1% | -6.2% | +39.0% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.7% | +3.9% | -1.5% | +27.4% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.2% | +4.7% | -4.6% | +25.1% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.4% | +6.7% | -6.6% | +30.3% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 17.96x | 1.39x | 2.54x | 0.14x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | $6.0B | $2.8B | $28.6B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $930M | $944M | $30.7B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $6.9B | $3.7B | $59.3B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.89x | 8.85x | -10.22x | 392.15x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NET five years ago would be worth $35,891 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,531 for AKAM. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs GDDY's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NET at 77.1% vs GDDY's 8.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.3% | +37.1% | +31.1% | +26.4% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.0% | +40.8% | +111.2% | +163.5% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.1% | +47.1% | +455.1% | +270.8% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +5.3% | +258.9% | +239.8% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +197.1% | +132.7% | +1328.1% | +996.1% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.6% | +13.7% | +77.1% | +54.8% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GDDY and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GDDY is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NET's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs GDDY's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.92x | 1.43x | 1.28x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $190.50 | $122.22 | $260.00 | $400.10 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.06 | $69.78 | $120.55 | $147.84 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.1% | +95.5% | +98.9% | +99.5% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 70.9 | 70.1 | 83.4 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 4.7M | 3.7M | 28.3M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GDDY as "Buy", AKAM as "Hold", NET as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs -15.8% for NET (target: $216). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.63 | $150.62 | $216.43 | $406.28 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 52 | 40 | 82 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.82 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.4% | +4.7% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.6% |
GDDY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GOOGL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
GDDY vs AKAM vs NET vs GOOGL vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Akamai Technologies, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, GoDaddy Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) delivered a total return of +258. 9%, compared to +5. 3% for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus AKAM's +194. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Cloudflare, Inc. 's 1. 43β — meaning NET is approximately 201% more volatile than GDDY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 18% for GoDaddy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cloudflare, Inc.
(NET) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus 5. 4% for Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for Cloudflare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NET leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -4. 7% for Cloudflare, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -9. 4% for NET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NET leads at 74. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 228. 9x for Cloudflare, Inc. — 216. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 31. 1% to $551. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. GDDY, AKAM, NET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GDDY or AKAM or NET or GOOGL or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85), 0. 8% yield, +776. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +776. 0%, AKAM: +194. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GDDY and AKAM and NET and GOOGL and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GDDY (Technology) and AKAM (Technology) and NET (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GDDY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AKAM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while GDDY, AKAM, NET, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.