Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GDDY vs HUBS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
GDDY vs HUBS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $11.97B | $12.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.02B | $3.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $870M | $100M |
| Gross Margin | 61.8% | 83.7% |
| Operating Margin | 17.6% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $3.86B | $485M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.08B | $882M |
GDDY vs HUBS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) | 100 | 116.2 | +16.2% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 122.2 | +22.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GDDY vs HUBS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GDDY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.42
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 0.61x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 0.61x
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- 469.1% 10Y total return vs GDDY's 197.1%
- 19.2% revenue growth vs GDDY's 8.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.2% revenue growth vs GDDY's 8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs HUBS's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs HUBS's 1.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -51.0% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.7% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC 26.2% vs 0.4% |
GDDY vs HUBS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GDDY vs HUBS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GDDY and HUBS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDDY is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 1.5x HUBS's $3.3B. GDDY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUBS's 3.0%. On growth, HUBS holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.0B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $870M | $100M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $712M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.8% | +83.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +21.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +23.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GDDY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, GDDY trades at a 95% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GDDY's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUBS's 69.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.0B | $12.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.8B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.41x | 284.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.89x | 19.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.03x | 69.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.42x | 4.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 56.82x | 6.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.60x | 17.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUBS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GDDY delivers a 3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $5 for HUBS. HUBS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GDDY's 17.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBS scores 6/9 vs GDDY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.7% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.2% | +0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.4% | +0.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 17.96x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | -$397M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $882M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $485M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.89x | 4753.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GDDY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GDDY five years ago would be worth $11,072 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,794 for HUBS. Over the past 12 months, GDDY leads with a -51.0% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GDDY at 8.6% vs HUBS's -18.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.3% | -36.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.0% | -62.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.1% | -45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | -52.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +197.1% | +469.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.6% | -18.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GDDY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GDDY is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUBS's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GDDY currently trades 47.1% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $190.50 | $682.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.06 | $187.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.1% | +35.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GDDY as "Buy" and HUBS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.7% upside for HUBS (target: $361) vs 26.2% for GDDY (target: $113).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $113.29 | $360.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.4% | +4.0% |
GDDY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HUBS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GDDY vs HUBS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GDDY or HUBS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY). GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GDDY or HUBS?
On trailing P/E, GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, GoDaddy Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GDDY or HUBS?
Over the past 5 years, GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) delivered a total return of +10. 7%, compared to -52. 1% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBS returned +469. 1% versus GDDY's +197. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GDDY or HUBS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus HubSpot, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning HUBS is approximately 181% more volatile than GDDY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 18% for GoDaddy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GDDY or HUBS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus 8. 3% for GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 4% for GoDaddy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HUBS leads at 21. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GDDY or HUBS?
GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 7% net margin versus 1. 5% for HubSpot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDDY leads at 22. 9% versus 0. 4% for HUBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GDDY or HUBS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 6x for HubSpot, Inc. — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBS: 47. 7% to $360. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — GDDY or HUBS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GDDY or HUBS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), +197. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GDDY: +197. 1%, HUBS: +469. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GDDY and HUBS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GDDY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.