GE vs CW vs RTX vs KTOS vs LMT

For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Aerospace (GE) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the cheapest at 23.

6x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 445. 3x. On forward P/E, Lockheed Martin Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Curtiss-Wright Corporation wins at 2. 22x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 33x.

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +467.

8%, compared to +44. 4% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1253% versus GE's +117. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning KTOS is approximately 1506% more volatile than LMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for Lockheed Martin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RTX Corporation grew EPS 39. 7% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

0% net margin versus 1. 6% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GE leads at 19. 1% versus 2. 1% for KTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CW leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 22x versus GE Aerospace's 3. 33x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 76. 4x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 59. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 89. 3% to $109. 58.

In this comparison, LMT (2.

7% yield), RTX (1. 5% yield), GE (0. 5% yield), CW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. KTOS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), 2. 7% yield, +153. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMT: +153. 7%, GE: +117. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. RTX, LMT pay a dividend while GE, CW, KTOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.