Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GEF vs SLGN vs SEE vs ATR vs SON

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GEF
Greif, Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.22B
5Y Perf.+100.1%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.25B
5Y Perf.+20.4%
SEE
Sealed Air Corporation

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.21B
5Y Perf.+31.0%
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.05B
5Y Perf.+12.3%
SON
Sonoco Products Company

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.10B
5Y Perf.-0.2%

GEF vs SLGN vs SEE vs ATR vs SON — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GEF logoGEF
SLGN logoSLGN
SEE logoSEE
ATR logoATR
SON logoSON
IndustryPackaging & ContainersPackaging & ContainersPackaging & ContainersMedical - Instruments & SuppliesPackaging & Containers
Market Cap$3.22B$4.25B$6.21B$8.05B$5.10B
Revenue (TTM)$3.35B$6.58B$5.36B$3.87B$7.49B
Net Income (TTM)$971M$283M$506M$387M$1.04B
Gross Margin22.6%17.4%29.8%21.9%20.9%
Operating Margin3.0%9.8%13.5%13.0%8.7%
Forward P/E17.3x10.6x12.4x22.5x8.8x
Total Debt$1.57B$4.62B$4.10B$1.53B$4.85B
Cash & Equiv.$257M$1.08B$344M$402M$378M

GEF vs SLGN vs SEE vs ATR vs SONLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GEF
SLGN
SEE
ATR
SON
StockMay 20May 26Return
Greif, Inc. (GEF)100200.1+100.1%
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN)100120.4+20.4%
Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE)100131.0+31.0%
AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR)100112.3+12.3%
Sonoco Products Com… (SON)10099.8-0.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GEF vs SLGN vs SEE vs ATR vs SON

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GEF leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Sealed Air Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. SON also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GEF
Greif, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GEF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 153.7% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 80.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 51.5%, current ratio 1.47x
  • PEG 0.38 vs SEE's 9.73
  • Lower P/E (17.3x vs 22.5x), PEG 0.38 vs 1.75
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

SLGN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
SEE
Sealed Air Corporation
The Defensive Choice

SEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.

  • Beta 0.32 vs SLGN's 0.66
  • +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Best for: stability and momentum
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ATR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
SON
Sonoco Products Company
The Income Pick

SON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
  • Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
  • Beta 0.53, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.05x
  • 41.7% revenue growth vs GEF's -1.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSON logoSON41.7% revenue growth vs GEF's -1.0%
ValueGEF logoGEFLower P/E (17.3x vs 22.5x), PEG 0.38 vs 1.75
Quality / MarginsGEF logoGEF29.0% margin vs SLGN's 4.3%
Stability / SafetySEE logoSEEBeta 0.32 vs SLGN's 0.66
DividendsSON logoSON4.0% yield, 30-year raise streak, vs ATR's 1.4%
Momentum (1Y)SEE logoSEE+44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GEF logoGEF16.5% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 4.7% vs 8.7%

GEF vs SLGN vs SEE vs ATR vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GEFGreif, Inc.
FY 2024
Global Industrial Packaging
57.3%$3.1B
Paper Packaging And Services
42.3%$2.3B
Land Management
0.4%$20M
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Containers
48.4%$3.1B
Dispensing and Specialty Closures
41.8%$2.7B
Custom Containers
9.8%$638M
SEESealed Air Corporation
FY 2024
Food Care
66.4%$3.6B
Protective
33.6%$1.8B
ATRAptarGroup, Inc.
FY 2025
Pharma Segment
57.0%$1.7B
Beauty Segment
43.0%$1.3B
SONSonoco Products Company
FY 2025
Consumer Packaging
66.9%$4.9B
Industrial Paper Packaging Segment
33.1%$2.4B

GEF vs SLGN vs SEE vs ATR vs SON — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGEFLAGGINGSON

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SEE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SON is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 2.2x GEF's $3.3B. GEF is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGN's 4.3%. On growth, ATR holds the edge at +10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.3B$6.6B$5.4B$3.9B$7.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$322M$966M$965M$801M$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$971M$283M$506M$387M$1.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$123M$307M$459M$325M$266M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.6%+17.4%+29.8%+21.9%+20.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.0%+9.8%+13.5%+13.0%+8.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+29.0%+4.3%+9.4%+10.0%+13.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.7%+4.7%+8.6%+8.4%+3.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-22.6%+6.5%+2.1%+10.8%-1.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-73.2%-6.3%+16.4%-4.3%+23.6%
SEE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GEF leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 4.5x trailing earnings, GEF trades at a 79% valuation discount to ATR's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GEF offers better value at 0.10x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Market CapShares × price$3.2B$4.3B$6.2B$8.1B$5.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.5B$7.8B$10.0B$9.2B$9.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS4.53x14.91x12.29x21.28x12.99x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.35x10.60x12.38x22.47x8.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.10x9.66x1.65x0.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.20x7.97x14.33x11.48x7.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.75x0.66x1.16x2.13x0.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.06x1.89x5.02x3.08x1.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.07x13.54x26.89x12.99x
GEF leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — GEF and SEE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. GEF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs ATR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+33.7%+12.5%+48.4%+18.6%+30.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.5%+3.0%+7.1%+7.6%+9.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+8.7%+11.2%+10.7%+6.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.7%+9.9%+14.1%+13.8%+8.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968557
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.52x2.03x3.31x0.56x1.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B$3.5B$3.8B$1.1B$4.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$257M$1.1B$344M$402M$378M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.6B$4.6B$4.1B$1.5B$4.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense90.09x3.36x1.95x16.19x4.60x
Evenly matched — GEF and SEE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GEF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GEF five years ago would be worth $11,965 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,088 for SEE. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEF at 5.7% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.2%-1.9%+2.0%+2.9%+17.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.2%-23.7%+44.2%-16.1%+21.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.1%-11.1%+2.4%+7.4%-3.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+19.6%+1.4%-19.1%-15.3%-9.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+153.7%+80.8%+4.4%+83.3%+48.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.7%-3.8%+0.8%+2.4%-1.1%
GEF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLGN's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x0.66x0.32x0.66x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$77.14$57.04$44.27$164.28$58.43
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$53.35$36.15$28.15$103.23$38.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.2%+70.6%+95.2%+76.2%+88.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.651.164.042.850.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded207K769K3.0M473K1.1M
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ATR and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GEF as "Hold", SLGN as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", ATR as "Buy", SON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.6% upside for ATR (target: $170) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, SON offers the higher dividend yield at 4.04% vs ATR's 1.45%.

MetricGEF logoGEFGreif, Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…SEE logoSEESealed Air Corpor…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.SON logoSONSonoco Products C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$75.33$50.50$43.50$169.67$59.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1321271821
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+2.0%+1.9%+1.4%+4.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02103330
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.12$0.80$0.81$1.81$2.09
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+1.6%0.0%+4.5%+0.2%
Evenly matched — ATR and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). GEF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallGreif, Inc. (GEF)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GEF vs SLGN vs SEE vs ATR vs SON: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Greif, Inc. (GEF). Greif, Inc. (GEF) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (17. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON?

On trailing P/E, Greif, Inc.

(GEF) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus AptarGroup, Inc. at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Greif, Inc. wins at 0. 38x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON?

Over the past 5 years, Greif, Inc.

(GEF) delivered a total return of +19. 6%, compared to -19. 1% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEF returned +153. 7% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

32β versus Silgan Holdings Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning SLGN is approximately 104% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Greif, Inc. (GEF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.

7% versus -1. 0% for Greif, Inc. (GEF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greif, Inc. grew EPS 223. 3% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON?

Greif, Inc.

(GEF) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus 4. 4% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATR leads at 13. 6% versus 6. 9% for GEF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Greif, Inc. (GEF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for AptarGroup, Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATR: 35. 6% to $169. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Sonoco Products Company (SON) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 4% for AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR).

09

Is GEF or SLGN or SEE or ATR or SON better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, SLGN: +80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GEF and SLGN and SEE and ATR and SON?

These companies operate in different sectors (GEF (Consumer Cyclical) and SLGN (Consumer Cyclical) and SEE (Consumer Cyclical) and ATR (Healthcare) and SON (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GEF is a small-cap deep-value stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; ATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GEF

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLGN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SON

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GEF and SLGN and SEE and ATR and SON on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GEF: -22.6% · SLGN: 6.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(GEF: 29.0% · SLGN: 4.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GEF: 4.5x · SLGN: 14.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.