GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$2.02B
5Y Perf.+78.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GEL vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Market Cap$1.84T
5Y Perf.+32.6%
GEL vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GEL | SOC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $1.84T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.68B | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | -8.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.05B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $98M |
GEL vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GEL
SOC
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) | 100 | 178.1 | +78.1% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GEL vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GEL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sable Offshore Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GEL
Genesis Energy, L.P.
The Income Pick
GEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth -45.0%, EPS growth 41.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -16.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, current ratio 0.98x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs GEL's -8.4%
- 9.5% revenue growth vs GEL's -45.0%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 20.7x)
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SOC | 9.5% revenue growth vs GEL's -45.0% |
| Value | SOC | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 20.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | GEL | 2.9% margin vs SOC's -391.5% |
| Stability / Safety | GEL | Beta 0.32 vs SOC's 1.51 |
| Dividends | GEL | 4.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GEL | +19.5% vs SOC's -36.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GEL | 1.0% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 4.0% vs -44.6% |
GEL vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
GEL vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGELLAGGINGSOC
SOCSable Offshore Corp.
0leads
GELGenesis Energy, L.P.
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SOCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GEL5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GEL2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GEL6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GEL4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GEL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 1320.7x SOC's $1M. GEL is the more profitable business, keeping 2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $550M | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $209M | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | -8.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.9% | -5.4% |
GEL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GEL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $1.84T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $1.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.56x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.72x | 7.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.31x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.85x | 2359.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.83x | — |
GEL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEL delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEL scores 4/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.30x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.97x | -2.28x |
GEL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEL five years ago would be worth $20,901 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, GEL leads with a +19.5% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEL at 23.2% vs SOC's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.5% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +8.2% |
GEL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEL currently trades 88.4% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.64 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.21 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.4 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 246K | 5.4M |
GEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GEL as "Buy" and SOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for SOC (target: $28) vs 21.4% for GEL (target: $20). GEL is the only dividend payer here at 4.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | GELGenesis Energy, L… | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.66 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GEL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
Best OverallGenesis Energy, L.P. (GEL)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GEL vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GEL or SOC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Genesis Energy, L.
P. (GEL) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GEL or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Genesis Energy, L.
P. (GEL) delivered a total return of +109. 0%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 5% versus GEL's -8. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GEL or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genesis Energy, L.
P. (GEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 42β — meaning SOC is approximately 416% more volatile than GEL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — GEL or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genesis Energy, L.
P. grew EPS 41. 1% year-over-year, compared to 40. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GEL or SOC?
Genesis Energy, L.
P. (GEL) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 5% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps -0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEL leads at 15. 8% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GEL leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GEL or SOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Genesis Energy, L. P. — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 118. 1% to $28. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — GEL or SOC?
In this comparison, GEL (4.
0% yield) pays a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GEL or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genesis Energy, L.
P. (GEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 4. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GEL: -8. 7%, SOC: +32. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GEL and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. GEL pays a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.