Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GEMI vs ASTS vs MNTS vs IRDM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Aerospace & Defense
Telecommunications Services
GEMI vs ASTS vs MNTS vs IRDM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $814M | $21.79B | $3M | $4.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $142M | $85M | $1M | $876M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-501M | $-487M | $-36M | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 8.2% | -27.0% | 66.0% | 62.5% |
| Operating Margin | -116.6% | -440.5% | -24.4% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 37.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.19B | $2.24B | $6M | $1.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $2.34B | $2M | $97M |
GEMI vs ASTS vs MNTS vs IRDM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 739.2 | +639.2% |
| Momentus Inc. (MNTS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Iridium Communicati… (IRDM) | 100 | 181.1 | +81.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GEMI vs ASTS vs MNTS vs IRDM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GEMI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs IRDM's 426.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.83, Low D/E 93.6%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs MNTS's -31.6%
MNTS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +188.6% vs GEMI's -84.2%
IRDM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 1.4%
- Beta 1.08, yield 1.4%, current ratio 2.48x
- 12.1% margin vs MNTS's -34.5%
- Beta 1.08 vs MNTS's 3.65
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs MNTS's -31.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs MNTS's -34.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs MNTS's 3.65 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +188.6% vs GEMI's -84.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC 8.0% vs -7.3% |
GEMI vs ASTS vs MNTS vs IRDM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GEMI vs ASTS vs MNTS vs IRDM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IRDM leads in 3 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 2 • GEMI leads 0 • MNTS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRDM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRDM is the larger business by revenue, generating $876M annually — 848.7x MNTS's $1M. IRDM is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNTS's -34.5%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +19.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $142M | $85M | $1M | $876M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$243M | -$317M | -$24M | $439M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$501M | -$487M | -$36M | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$81M | -$1.3B | -$18M | $305M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -27.0% | +66.0% | +62.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -116.6% | -4.4% | -24.4% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -111.5% | -5.7% | -34.5% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -80.8% | -15.3% | -17.9% | +34.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +19.5% | +118.7% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.3% | -2.3% | -140.0% | -25.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ASTS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $814M | $21.8B | $3M | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $21.7B | $8M | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.13x | -54.45x | -0.14x | 39.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 37.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 13.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.72x | 307.28x | 1.53x | 5.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.81x | — | 9.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IRDM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRDM delivers a 22.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-25 for ASTS. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.94x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRDM's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRDM scores 8/9 vs MNTS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -24.9% | — | +22.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.3% | -12.6% | -2.8% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.0% | -16.8% | -7.3% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -113.1% | -10.0% | -13.2% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.94x | — | 3.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$97M | $4M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $2.3B | $2M | $97M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $2.2B | $6M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.78x | -13.14x | -54.08x | 2.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $99,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, MNTS leads with a +188.6% total return vs GEMI's -84.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 142.1% vs MNTS's -72.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.2% | -12.6% | -7.0% | +135.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.2% | +168.6% | +188.6% | +56.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +1319.5% | -98.0% | -30.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +892.7% | -99.9% | +23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +646.8% | -99.9% | +426.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.9% | +142.1% | -72.9% | -11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
IRDM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IRDM is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRDM currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs GEMI's 11.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.36x | 2.83x | 3.65x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.89 | $129.89 | $15.98 | $44.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.91 | $22.47 | $0.44 | $15.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.0% | +56.2% | +33.4% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 53.2 | 55.2 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 15.7M | 2.1M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEMI as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", IRDM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.5% upside for GEMI (target: $10) vs -14.8% for IRDM (target: $36). IRDM is the only dividend payer here at 1.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.64 | $103.65 | — | $35.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 7 | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.58 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.2% |
IRDM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
GEMI vs ASTS vs MNTS vs IRDM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GEMI or ASTS or MNTS or IRDM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 6% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM) offers the better valuation at 39. 3x trailing P/E (37. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gemini Space Station, Inc. Class A Common Stock (GEMI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GEMI or ASTS or MNTS or IRDM?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +892. 7%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +646. 8% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GEMI or ASTS or MNTS or IRDM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Iridium Communications Inc.
(IRDM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 65β — meaning MNTS is approximately 239% more volatile than IRDM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 94% versus 4% for Iridium Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GEMI or ASTS or MNTS or IRDM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -31. 6% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Momentus Inc. grew EPS 90. 0% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Iridium Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GEMI or ASTS or MNTS or IRDM?
Iridium Communications Inc.
(IRDM) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus -1653. 1% for Momentus Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRDM leads at 27. 1% versus -1404. 1% for MNTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GEMI or ASTS or MNTS or IRDM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GEMI: 90.
5% to $9. 64.
07Which pays a better dividend — GEMI or ASTS or MNTS or IRDM?
In this comparison, IRDM (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. GEMI, ASTS, MNTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GEMI or ASTS or MNTS or IRDM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Iridium Communications Inc.
(IRDM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 1. 4% yield, +426. 8% 10Y return). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRDM: +426. 8%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GEMI and ASTS and MNTS and IRDM?
These companies operate in different sectors (GEMI (Financial Services) and ASTS (Technology) and MNTS (Industrials) and IRDM (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GEMI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IRDM pays a dividend while GEMI, ASTS, MNTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.