Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GGG vs FELE vs GTLS vs XYL vs PNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
GGG vs FELE vs GTLS vs XYL vs PNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $12.88B | $4.39B | $9.93B | $27.04B | $12.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.25B | $2.18B | $4.26B | $9.09B | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $516M | $150M | $40M | $973M | $671M |
| Gross Margin | 52.3% | 35.2% | 32.6% | 38.6% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | 26.9% | 12.6% | 8.5% | 13.6% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 24.8x | 21.6x | 16.4x | 20.6x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $61M | $280M | $3.74B | $1.94B | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $624M | $100M | $366M | $1.48B | $102M |
GGG vs FELE vs GTLS vs XYL vs PNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graco Inc. (GGG) | 100 | 160.9 | +60.9% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 195.9 | +95.9% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.5 | +428.5% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 171.5 | +71.5% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GGG vs FELE vs GTLS vs XYL vs PNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GGG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 9.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 3.15x
- Beta 0.80, yield 1.4%, current ratio 3.15x
FELE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs XYL's 1.4%
GTLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs FELE's 229.5%
- Beta 0.49 vs PNR's 1.21
- +31.8% vs PNR's -16.8%
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.90 vs GGG's 2.50
PNR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.0% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs PNR's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs XYL's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.8% vs PNR's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 22.6% vs 7.4% |
GGG vs FELE vs GTLS vs XYL vs PNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GGG vs FELE vs GTLS vs XYL vs PNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GGG leads in 2 of 6 categories
GTLS leads 2 • PNR leads 1 • FELE leads 0 • XYL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GGG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 4.2x FELE's $2.2B. GGG is the more profitable business, keeping 23.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, FELE holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $2.2B | $4.3B | $9.1B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $690M | $322M | $644M | $1.8B | $983M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $516M | $150M | $40M | $973M | $671M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $631M | $169M | $203M | $966M | $716M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.3% | +35.2% | +32.6% | +38.6% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | +12.6% | +8.5% | +13.6% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +6.9% | +0.9% | +10.7% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +10.6% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +9.9% | -2.5% | +2.7% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +13.4% | -36.1% | +14.5% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PNR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.4x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYL offers better value at 1.27x vs FELE's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.9B | $4.4B | $9.9B | $27.0B | $12.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.3B | $4.6B | $13.3B | $27.5B | $14.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.19x | 30.57x | 628.58x | 29.02x | 19.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.80x | 21.64x | 16.40x | 20.56x | 14.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.54x | 3.51x | — | 1.27x | 1.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.15x | 13.74x | 14.33x | 15.29x | 14.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.76x | 2.06x | 2.33x | 2.99x | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.95x | 3.39x | 2.79x | 2.36x | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.19x | 22.67x | 48.96x | 29.71x | 16.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GGG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GGG delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. GGG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.7% | +11.4% | +1.2% | +8.5% | +17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.0% | +7.6% | +0.4% | +5.6% | +9.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.6% | +14.7% | +7.4% | +7.6% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.0% | +18.1% | +8.6% | +8.5% | +15.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.21x | 1.11x | 0.17x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$563M | $181M | $3.4B | $463M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $624M | $100M | $366M | $1.5B | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $61M | $280M | $3.7B | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 209.82x | 24.75x | 1.08x | 49.32x | 11.94x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTLS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $14,063 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,064 for XYL. Over the past 12 months, GTLS leads with a +31.8% total return vs PNR's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.6% vs GGG's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.4% | +3.0% | +0.6% | -16.7% | -26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.0% | +14.9% | +31.8% | -6.4% | -16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | +9.4% | +62.7% | +10.1% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.3% | +21.6% | +40.6% | +0.6% | +17.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +224.7% | +229.5% | +772.7% | +200.2% | +121.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | +3.0% | +17.6% | +3.3% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNR's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 67.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.89x | 0.49x | 0.90x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.69 | $111.53 | $208.51 | $154.27 | $113.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.42 | $83.42 | $140.50 | $113.46 | $76.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.1% | +89.1% | +99.5% | +73.7% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.6 | 51.4 | 43.8 | 40.4 | 33.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 275K | 1.6M | 2.1M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FELE and XYL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GGG as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy", XYL as "Hold", PNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs -6.6% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, XYL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.41% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $95.67 | $100.00 | $193.81 | $151.57 | $113.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 11 | 37 | 40 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.1% | +0.3% | +1.4% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 20 | 32 | 1 | 15 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.08 | $1.11 | $0.60 | $1.60 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +3.8% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.8% |
GGG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GTLS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
GGG vs FELE vs GTLS vs XYL vs PNR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Graco Inc.
(GGG) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
4x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 6x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 90x versus Graco Inc. 's 2. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +40. 6%, compared to +0. 6% for Xylem Inc. (XYL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 7% versus PNR's +121. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Pentair plc's 1. 21β — meaning PNR is approximately 146% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Graco Inc. (GGG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Graco Inc.
(GGG) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Graco Inc. grew EPS 9. 2% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR?
Graco Inc.
(GGG) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 3% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GGG leads at 27. 3% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GGG leads at 52. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus Graco Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Graco Inc. — 10. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 47. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Xylem Inc. (XYL) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is GGG or FELE or GTLS or XYL or PNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), +772. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 7%, PNR: +121. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GGG and FELE and GTLS and XYL and PNR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
GGG, FELE, XYL, PNR pay a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.