Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GHRS vs ATAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
GHRS vs ATAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Pharmaceuticals |
| Market Cap | $1.39B | $1.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $-154M |
| Gross Margin | — | -259.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -34.6% |
| Total Debt | $512K | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $246M | $18M |
GHRS vs ATAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GH Research PLC (GHRS) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| Atai Beckley N.V (ATAI) | 100 | 21.7 | -78.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GHRS vs ATAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GHRS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth -5.3%
- 16.6% 10Y total return vs ATAI's -46.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.72, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 34.13x
ATAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.48
- Beta 1.48, current ratio 3.21x
- -1.9% revenue growth vs GHRS's -24.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs GHRS's -24.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.8% margin vs ATAI's -51.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs GHRS's 1.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +202.2% vs GHRS's +122.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -15.8% ROA vs ATAI's -64.3%, ROIC -80.7% vs -45.0% |
GHRS vs ATAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GHRS vs ATAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHRS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATAI and GHRS operate at a comparable scale, with $3M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$60M | -$103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | -$154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -2.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -34.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -51.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -29.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.3% | -75.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GHRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.41x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3255.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.90x | 5.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GHRS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHRS delivers a -16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-96 for ATAI. GHRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATAI's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GHRS scores 3/9 vs ATAI's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.3% | -96.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.8% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -80.7% | -45.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.4% | -50.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$246M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $246M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $512,000 | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -109.68x | -68.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GHRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHRS five years ago would be worth $11,657 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,097 for ATAI. Over the past 12 months, ATAI leads with a +202.2% total return vs GHRS's +122.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHRS at 36.1% vs ATAI's 27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +69.5% | +7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +122.2% | +202.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.9% | +107.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.6% | -79.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.6% | -46.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.1% | +27.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GHRS and ATAI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATAI is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GHRS's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GHRS currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs ATAI's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.66 | $6.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.46 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.0% | +61.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.5 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GHRS as "Buy" and ATAI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 187.8% upside for ATAI (target: $12) vs 62.7% for GHRS (target: $37).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.50 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GHRS leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
GHRS vs ATAI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GHRS or ATAI a better buy right now?
Analysts rate GH Research PLC (GHRS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GHRS or ATAI?
Over the past 5 years, GH Research PLC (GHRS) delivered a total return of +16.
6%, compared to -79. 0% for Atai Beckley N. V (ATAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GHRS returned +9. 1% versus ATAI's -47. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GHRS or ATAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atai Beckley N.
V (ATAI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus GH Research PLC's 1. 72β — meaning GHRS is approximately 16% more volatile than ATAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GH Research PLC (GHRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 21% for Atai Beckley N. V — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GHRS or ATAI?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GH Research PLC grew EPS -5.
3% year-over-year, compared to -272. 0% for Atai Beckley N. V. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GHRS or ATAI?
GH Research PLC (GHRS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -484. 6% for Atai Beckley N. V — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GHRS leads at 0. 0% versus -333. 4% for ATAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GHRS or ATAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GHRS or ATAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atai Beckley N.
V (ATAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. GH Research PLC (GHRS) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATAI: -47. 7%, GHRS: +9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GHRS and ATAI?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.