Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GHRS vs ATAI vs CMPS vs MNMD vs CYBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Medical - Care Facilities
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
GHRS vs ATAI vs CMPS vs MNMD vs CYBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $964M | $902M | $2.04B | $304M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $-154M | $-288M | $-238M | $-123M |
| Gross Margin | — | -259.1% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -34.6% | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $512K | $25M | $21M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $246M | $18M | $150M | $258M | $135M |
GHRS vs ATAI vs CMPS vs MNMD vs CYBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GH Research PLC (GHRS) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| Atai Beckley N.V (ATAI) | 100 | 21.7 | -78.3% |
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 24.6 | -75.4% |
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| Cybin Inc. (CYBN) | 100 | 8.6 | -91.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GHRS vs ATAI vs CMPS vs MNMD vs CYBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GHRS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in efficiency.
- -15.8% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8%
ATAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 21.2%, current ratio 3.21x
- -1.9% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9%
CMPS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- beta 1.33
- Beta 1.33 vs GHRS's 1.72
MNMD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs GHRS's 9.1%
- +214.0% vs CYBN's -1.9%
CYBN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- EPS growth 93.5%
- Beta 1.52, current ratio 7.75x
- 3.2% margin vs ATAI's -51.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.9% revenue growth vs MNMD's -96.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ATAI's -51.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs GHRS's 1.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.0% vs CYBN's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -15.8% ROA vs CMPS's -106.8% |
GHRS vs ATAI vs CMPS vs MNMD vs CYBN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GHRS vs ATAI vs CMPS vs MNMD vs CYBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GHRS leads in 3 of 6 categories
MNMD leads 1 • ATAI leads 0 • CMPS leads 0 • CYBN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHRS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ATAI and CYBN operate at a comparable scale, with $3M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$60M | -$103M | -$179M | -$191M | -$147M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | -$154M | -$288M | -$238M | -$123M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | -$90M | -$157M | -$174M | -$106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -2.6% | — | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -34.6% | — | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -51.1% | — | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -29.9% | — | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.7% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.3% | -75.0% | -58.7% | -163.0% | -8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GHRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $964M | $902M | $2.0B | $304M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $971M | $774M | $1.8B | $205M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.59x | -4.31x | -3.05x | -10.04x | -13.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3130.37x | — | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.59x | 5.51x | — | 5.56x | 6.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GHRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHRS delivers a -16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CMPS. GHRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATAI's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GHRS scores 3/9 vs CMPS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.3% | -96.4% | -3.4% | -102.5% | -81.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.8% | -64.3% | -106.8% | -70.7% | -58.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -80.7% | -45.0% | — | -3.9% | -115.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.4% | -50.4% | -2.5% | -52.2% | -54.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.21x | — | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$246M | $7M | -$129M | -$258M | -$135M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $246M | $18M | $150M | $258M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $512,000 | $25M | $21M | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -109.68x | -68.93x | -52.40x | -21.81x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHRS five years ago would be worth $10,914 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $968 for CYBN. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +214.0% total return vs CYBN's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.7% vs CYBN's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.7% | +3.6% | +43.4% | +51.7% | -26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +104.6% | +188.5% | +151.1% | +214.0% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.8% | +99.5% | +11.0% | +510.3% | -49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | -79.8% | -72.4% | -57.9% | -90.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.1% | -47.7% | -67.6% | +512.1% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.1% | +25.9% | +3.5% | +82.7% | -20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMPS and MNMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMPS is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GHRS's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNMD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs ATAI's 59.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.48x | 1.33x | 1.68x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.66 | $6.75 | $10.21 | $21.09 | $9.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.46 | $1.29 | $2.25 | $6.03 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +59.4% | +92.0% | +98.1% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 51.5 | 68.1 | 64.9 | 35.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 227K | 6.0M | 3.7M | 792K | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GHRS as "Buy", ATAI as "Buy", CMPS as "Buy", MNMD as "Buy", CYBN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 199.3% upside for ATAI (target: $12) vs -3.3% for MNMD (target: $20).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.50 | $12.00 | $17.83 | $20.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 4 | 13 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GHRS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNMD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
GHRS vs ATAI vs CMPS vs MNMD vs CYBN: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GHRS or ATAI or CMPS or MNMD or CYBN a better buy right now?
Analysts rate GH Research PLC (GHRS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GHRS or ATAI or CMPS or MNMD or CYBN?
Over the past 5 years, GH Research PLC (GHRS) delivered a total return of +9.
1%, compared to -90. 3% for Cybin Inc. (CYBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNMD returned +512. 1% versus CYBN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GHRS or ATAI or CMPS or MNMD or CYBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus GH Research PLC's 1. 72β — meaning GHRS is approximately 29% more volatile than CMPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GH Research PLC (GHRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 21% for Atai Beckley N. V — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GHRS or ATAI or CMPS or MNMD or CYBN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cybin Inc.
grew EPS 93. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GHRS or ATAI or CMPS or MNMD or CYBN?
GH Research PLC (GHRS) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -484. 6% for Atai Beckley N. V — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GHRS leads at 0. 0% versus -333. 4% for ATAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GHRS or ATAI or CMPS or MNMD or CYBN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GHRS or ATAI or CMPS or MNMD or CYBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+512. 1% 10Y return). GH Research PLC (GHRS) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNMD: +512. 1%, GHRS: +9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GHRS and ATAI and CMPS and MNMD and CYBN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.