Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GIGM vs GAME vs SKLZ vs HUYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Entertainment
GIGM vs GAME vs SKLZ vs HUYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $16M | $17M | $109M | $481M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $87M | $104M | $6.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-40M | $-70M | $-153M |
| Gross Margin | 52.8% | 15.4% | 87.5% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | -100.6% | -50.0% | -68.3% | -3.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $500K | $24M | $129M | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $12M | $195M | $1.19B |
GIGM vs GAME vs SKLZ vs HUYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GigaMedia Limited (GIGM) | 100 | 51.3 | -48.7% |
| GameSquare Holdings… (GAME) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 3.4 | -96.6% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GIGM vs GAME vs SKLZ vs HUYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GIGM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- -44.6% 10Y total return vs HUYA's -60.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 18.35x
- Beta 0.27, current ratio 18.35x
- Beta 0.27 vs SKLZ's 2.57, lower leverage
GAME is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 132.9%, EPS growth 37.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.4%
- 132.9% revenue growth vs GIGM's -30.8%
SKLZ is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +34.7% vs GAME's -31.6%
HUYA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 56.7%
- -2.5% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4%
- 56.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- -1.7% ROA vs GAME's -90.8%, ROIC -1.7% vs -126.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 132.9% revenue growth vs GIGM's -30.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.5% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs SKLZ's 2.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 56.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs GAME's -31.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs GAME's -90.8%, ROIC -1.7% vs -126.4% |
GIGM vs GAME vs SKLZ vs HUYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GIGM vs GAME vs SKLZ vs HUYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HUYA leads in 3 of 6 categories
GIGM leads 1 • GAME leads 0 • SKLZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUYA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 1797.9x GIGM's $3M. HUYA is the more profitable business, keeping -2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKLZ's -67.4%. On growth, SKLZ holds the edge at +53.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $87M | $104M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$40M | -$70M | -$120M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | -$40M | -$70M | -$153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$20M | -$70M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.8% | +15.4% | +87.5% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -100.6% | -50.0% | -68.3% | -3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.3% | -46.1% | -67.4% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -80.3% | -23.4% | -67.3% | -1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.1% | -11.1% | +53.8% | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +79.6% | -24.7% | -118.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GIGM and GAME and HUYA each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16M | $17M | $109M | $481M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$18M | $29M | $43M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.81x | -0.26x | -1.55x | -103.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 3.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.32x | 0.18x | 1.04x | 0.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 1.04x | 0.97x | 0.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUYA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUYA delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GAME. HUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GAME's 1.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUYA scores 7/9 vs SKLZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -3.2% | -52.5% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -90.8% | -21.8% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -45.9% | -126.4% | -148.3% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | -175.8% | -34.0% | -2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.97x | 1.15x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$35M | $12M | -$66M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $12M | $195M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $500,000 | $24M | $129M | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -466.47x | -7.08x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GIGM and SKLZ and HUYA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GIGM five years ago would be worth $5,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $129 for GAME. Over the past 12 months, SKLZ leads with a +34.7% total return vs GAME's -31.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUYA at 25.9% vs GAME's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | +2.6% | +58.3% | +5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.1% | -31.6% | +34.7% | +26.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | -89.6% | -42.7% | +99.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.8% | -98.7% | -97.8% | -60.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.6% | -100.0% | -96.5% | -60.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | -52.9% | -16.9% | +25.9% |
Risk & Volatility
GIGM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIGM is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKLZ's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GIGM currently trades 75.7% from its 52-week high vs GAME's 15.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 2.36x | 2.57x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.89 | $2.87 | $20.00 | $4.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $0.23 | $2.23 | $2.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +15.5% | +34.9% | +64.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 51.0 | 54.4 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 9.0M | 1.2M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
HUYA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKLZ as "Hold", HUYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). HUYA is the only dividend payer here at 56.67% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $72.00 | $3.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +56.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $12.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.5% | +7.6% |
HUYA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GIGM leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
GIGM vs GAME vs SKLZ vs HUYA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GIGM or GAME or SKLZ or HUYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
(GAME) is the stronger pick with 132. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 8% for GigaMedia Limited (GIGM). Analysts rate HUYA Inc. (HUYA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GIGM or GAME or SKLZ or HUYA?
Over the past 5 years, GigaMedia Limited (GIGM) delivered a total return of -49.
8%, compared to -98. 7% for GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (GAME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GIGM returned -44. 6% versus GAME's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GIGM or GAME or SKLZ or HUYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GigaMedia Limited (GIGM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Skillz Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning SKLZ is approximately 854% more volatile than GIGM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HUYA Inc. (HUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 197% for GameSquare Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GIGM or GAME or SKLZ or HUYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
(GAME) is pulling ahead at 132. 9% versus -30. 8% for GigaMedia Limited (GIGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -67. 0% for Skillz Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GAME leads at 42. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GIGM or GAME or SKLZ or HUYA?
HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 8% net margin versus -77. 3% for GigaMedia Limited — meaning it keeps -0. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUYA leads at -3. 1% versus -124. 6% for GIGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GIGM or GAME or SKLZ or HUYA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931.
5% to $72. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — GIGM or GAME or SKLZ or HUYA?
In this comparison, HUYA (56.
7% yield) pays a dividend. GIGM, GAME, SKLZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GIGM or GAME or SKLZ or HUYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GigaMedia Limited (GIGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27)). GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (GAME) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GIGM: -44. 6%, GAME: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GIGM and GAME and SKLZ and HUYA?
These companies operate in different sectors (GIGM (Technology) and GAME (Technology) and SKLZ (Technology) and HUYA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GIGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GAME is a small-cap high-growth stock; SKLZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HUYA pays a dividend while GIGM, GAME, SKLZ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.