Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GLBE vs BRZE vs AMZN vs FOUR vs ORCL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
GLBE vs BRZE vs AMZN vs FOUR vs ORCL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $5.52B | $2.31B | $2.92T | $3.81B | $559.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $962M | $738M | $742.78B | $3.33B | $64.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $68M | $-131M | $90.80B | $86M | $16.21B |
| Gross Margin | 45.3% | 67.1% | 50.6% | 35.2% | 66.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | -19.6% | 11.5% | 11.3% | 30.8% |
| Forward P/E | 29.2x | 35.7x | 34.8x | 8.4x | 26.0x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $83M | $152.99B | $4.62B | $104.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $246M | $124M | $86.81B | $964M | $10.79B |
GLBE vs BRZE vs AMZN vs FOUR vs ORCL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) | 100 | 49.1 | -50.9% |
| Braze, Inc. (BRZE) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
| Shift4 Payments, In… (FOUR) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 214.4 | +114.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLBE vs BRZE vs AMZN vs FOUR vs ORCL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLBE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- PEG 0.22 vs ORCL's 3.66
- 27.8% revenue growth vs ORCL's 8.4%
BRZE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 1.27 vs GLBE's 1.63
AMZN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ORCL's 425.1%
- +43.7% vs FOUR's -43.7%
- 11.5% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 14.7% vs -20.5%
FOUR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.51, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.66x
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 26.0x)
ORCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 1.59, yield 0.9%
- 25.3% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
- 0.9% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs FOUR's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.8% revenue growth vs ORCL's 8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 26.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs BRZE's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs GLBE's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs FOUR's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs FOUR's -43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 14.7% vs -20.5% |
GLBE vs BRZE vs AMZN vs FOUR vs ORCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GLBE vs BRZE vs AMZN vs FOUR vs ORCL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
FOUR leads 1 • ORCL leads 1 • GLBE leads 0 • BRZE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GLBE and ORCL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1006.2x BRZE's $738M. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRZE's -17.8%. On growth, GLBE holds the edge at +28.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $962M | $738M | $742.8B | $3.3B | $64.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $130M | -$131M | $155.9B | $629M | $26.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $68M | -$131M | $90.8B | $86M | $16.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $295M | $61M | -$2.5B | $687M | -$24.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.3% | +67.1% | +50.6% | +35.2% | +66.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | -19.6% | +11.5% | +11.3% | +30.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -17.8% | +12.2% | +2.6% | +25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.6% | +8.2% | -0.3% | +20.6% | -38.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.0% | +27.9% | +16.6% | -100.0% | +21.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -70.6% | +74.8% | -105.0% | +24.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FOUR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 55% valuation discount to GLBE's 83.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GLBE offers better value at 0.64x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.5B | $2.3B | $2.92T | $3.8B | $559.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.3B | $2.3B | $2.98T | $7.5B | $652.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 83.67x | -18.52x | 37.82x | 43.39x | 44.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.20x | 35.72x | 34.77x | 8.41x | 25.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.64x | — | 1.35x | — | 6.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.36x | — | 20.47x | 9.53x | 27.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.74x | 3.13x | 4.07x | 0.91x | 9.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.16x | 3.91x | 7.14x | 2.13x | 26.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.66x | 37.34x | 378.98x | 7.63x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BRZE. GLBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOUR scores 7/9 vs BRZE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | -22.8% | +23.3% | +4.4% | +56.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | -12.9% | +11.5% | +1.0% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | -20.5% | +14.7% | +6.3% | +12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | -23.4% | +15.3% | +6.3% | +14.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.13x | 0.37x | 2.36x | 4.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$204M | -$42M | $66.2B | $3.7B | $93.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $246M | $124M | $86.8B | $964M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $83M | $153.0B | $4.6B | $104.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.83x | — | 39.96x | 3.40x | 5.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,420 for BRZE. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs FOUR's -43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs FOUR's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | -30.6% | +19.7% | -25.2% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.5% | -30.7% | +43.7% | -43.7% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.0% | -20.7% | +156.2% | -24.0% | +106.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.0% | -75.8% | +64.8% | -46.4% | +151.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.0% | -75.8% | +697.8% | +39.7% | +425.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.3% | -7.4% | +36.8% | -8.7% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRZE and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRZE is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLBE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FOUR's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.27x | 1.51x | 1.51x | 1.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.21 | $37.67 | $278.56 | $108.50 | $345.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.80 | $15.26 | $185.01 | $39.91 | $134.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +60.0% | +97.3% | +43.2% | +56.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 47.6 | 81.1 | 43.3 | 68.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 3.0M | 45.5M | 2.2M | 26.3M |
Analyst Outlook
ORCL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLBE as "Buy", BRZE as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", FOUR as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.8% upside for BRZE (target: $42) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). For income investors, ORCL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.85% vs FOUR's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.40 | $42.44 | $306.77 | $73.36 | $257.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 25 | 94 | 29 | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.7% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.34 | $1.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +12.8% | +0.3% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FOUR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GLBE vs BRZE vs AMZN vs FOUR vs ORCL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 4% for Oracle Corporation (ORCL). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 83. 7x. On forward P/E, Shift4 Payments, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Global-e Online Ltd. wins at 0. 22x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -75. 8% for Braze, Inc. (BRZE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus BRZE's -75. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Global-e Online Ltd. 's 1. 63β — meaning GLBE is approximately 28% more volatile than BRZE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus 8. 4% for Oracle Corporation (ORCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -64. 4% for Shift4 Payments, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -17. 8% for Braze, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -19. 6% for BRZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORCL leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Shift4 Payments, Inc. (FOUR) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 7x for Braze, Inc. — 27. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRZE: 87. 8% to $42. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL?
In this comparison, ORCL (0.
9% yield), FOUR (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. GLBE, BRZE, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLBE or BRZE or AMZN or FOUR or ORCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
9% yield, +425. 1% 10Y return). Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORCL: +425. 1%, GLBE: +28. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLBE and BRZE and AMZN and FOUR and ORCL?
These companies operate in different sectors (GLBE (Consumer Cyclical) and BRZE (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and FOUR (Technology) and ORCL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GLBE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BRZE is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; FOUR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FOUR, ORCL pay a dividend while GLBE, BRZE, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.