Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GLBZ vs CZFS vs FXNC vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
GLBZ vs CZFS vs FXNC vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $14M | $317M | $253M | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $173M | $112M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26K | $37M | $18M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | 63.3% | 74.0% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | 26.0% | 19.6% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.4x | 11.7x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $309M | $43M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $38M | $161M | $119M |
GLBZ vs CZFS vs FXNC vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
| Citizens Financial … (CZFS) | 100 | 133.1 | +33.1% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLBZ vs CZFS vs FXNC vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLBZ is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.1% yield, vs FXNC's 2.2%
CZFS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 3.0%
- PEG 2.12 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 11.8x), PEG 2.12 vs 2.32
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
FXNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- NIM 3.6% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FXNC's 0.70
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 11.8x), PEG 2.12 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FXNC's 0.70 | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, vs FXNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.9% vs GLBZ's +18.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs GLBZ's 0.7% |
GLBZ vs CZFS vs FXNC vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GLBZ vs CZFS vs FXNC vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CZFS leads in 1 of 6 categories
FXNC leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • GLBZ leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $173M annually — 10.8x GLBZ's $16M. CZFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLBZ's -0.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $173M | $112M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10,000 | $45M | $25M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26,000 | $37M | $18M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $35M | $21M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.4% | +63.3% | +74.0% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +26.0% | +19.6% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +21.1% | +15.8% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +20.3% | +18.7% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +31.3% | +7.1% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GLBZ and CZFS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.6x trailing earnings, CZFS trades at a 40% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CZFS offers better value at 2.17x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $317M | $253M | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $588M | $134M | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -125.61x | 8.65x | 14.27x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.44x | 11.75x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.17x | 9.55x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.04x | 6.13x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 1.83x | 2.25x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 0.94x | 1.35x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.99x | 12.03x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FXNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CZFS delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $0 for GLBZ. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLBZ's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FXNC scores 7/9 vs GLBZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | +11.4% | +10.0% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +1.2% | +0.9% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +5.4% | +7.7% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +7.0% | +9.9% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.92x | 0.23x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $271M | -$118M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $38M | $161M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $309M | $43M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.06x | 0.74x | 0.84x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,088 for GLBZ. Over the past 12 months, FXNC leads with a +46.9% total return vs GLBZ's +18.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs GLBZ's -12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +19.3% | +14.6% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | +18.8% | +46.9% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.7% | -10.6% | +110.8% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.1% | +29.5% | +68.7% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.9% | +82.2% | +241.1% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.3% | -3.7% | +28.2% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLBZ and CZFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLBZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FXNC's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZFS currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs GLBZ's 82.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.42x | 0.67x | 0.70x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.88 | $69.61 | $29.85 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $49.99 | $18.31 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +94.7% | +93.7% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 48.7 | 47.6 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 8K | 80K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLBZ and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZFS as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy". For income investors, GLBZ offers the higher dividend yield at 6.15% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $21.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +3.0% | +2.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $1.99 | $0.61 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.1% | +3.1% |
CZFS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FXNC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GLBZ vs CZFS vs FXNC vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
(CZFS) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Citizens Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Citizens Financial Services, Inc. wins at 2. 12x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -49. 1% for Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus GLBZ's -20. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
42β versus First National Corporation's 0. 70β — meaning FXNC is approximately -268% more volatile than GLBZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 168% for Glen Burnie Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -107. 7% for Glen Burnie Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI?
Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
(CZFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus -0. 7% for Glen Burnie Bancorp — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZFS leads at 26. 0% versus -4. 0% for GLBZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 12x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is GLBZ or CZFS or FXNC or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
42), 6. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLBZ: -20. 9%, CZFS: +82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLBZ and CZFS and FXNC and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLBZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CZFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.