Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GLBZ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
GLBZ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $14M | $203M | $415M | $339M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $90M | $208M | $157M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26K | $14M | $35M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | 54.7% | 51.6% | 66.1% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | 7.0% | 23.3% | 39.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.8x | 9.6x | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $52M | $180M | $75M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $119M | $225M | $81M |
GLBZ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 355.9 | +255.9% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 424.0 | +324.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLBZ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLBZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 6.1% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs BWFG's 0.84, lower leverage
BWFG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 261.8%
- PEG 0.22 vs CZWI's 2.32
- +55.7% vs NECB's +10.7%
NECB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 460.8% 10Y total return vs BWFG's 175.8%
- NIM 4.9% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (7.6x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 2.32
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GLBZ's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GLBZ's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs BWFG's 0.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.7% vs NECB's +10.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs GLBZ's 0.7% |
GLBZ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLBZ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 3 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • GLBZ leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BWFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $208M annually — 13.0x GLBZ's $16M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLBZ's -0.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $90M | $208M | $157M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10,000 | $9M | $53M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26,000 | $14M | $35M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $11M | -$5M | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.4% | +54.7% | +51.6% | +66.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +7.0% | +23.3% | +39.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +16.0% | +16.9% | +28.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +11.5% | +12.6% | +32.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +63.0% | +2.1% | +6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NECB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 48% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.22x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $203M | $415M | $339M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20M | $136M | $370M | $333M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -125.61x | 14.44x | 11.71x | 7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.78x | 9.62x | 7.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | 0.27x | 0.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.28x | 7.04x | 5.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 2.25x | 2.00x | 2.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 1.09x | 1.35x | 0.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.55x | 15.90x | 6.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $0 for GLBZ. NECB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLBZ's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs GLBZ's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.1% | +7.8% | +12.2% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +2.0% | +8.0% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +0.6% | +4.4% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.28x | 0.60x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$67M | -$45M | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $119M | $225M | $81M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $52M | $180M | $75M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.06x | 0.16x | 0.49x | 1.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $22,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,088 for GLBZ. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +55.7% total return vs NECB's +10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs GLBZ's -12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.7% | +21.5% | +16.1% | +9.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | +45.6% | +55.7% | +10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.7% | +160.0% | +144.3% | +107.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.1% | +71.2% | +92.1% | +120.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.9% | +157.0% | +175.8% | +460.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.3% | +37.5% | +34.7% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLBZ and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLBZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWFG's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs GLBZ's 82.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.42x | 0.46x | 0.84x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.88 | $22.62 | $53.86 | $25.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $12.83 | $33.26 | $19.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +93.2% | +96.8% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 63.7 | 55.8 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 40K | 40K | 36K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLBZ and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy", NECB as "Hold". For income investors, GLBZ offers the higher dividend yield at 6.15% vs BWFG's 1.54%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | +1.8% | +1.5% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | $0.37 | $0.80 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.3% | +0.5% |
NECB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GLBZ vs CZWI vs BWFG vs NECB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the stronger pick with 13.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -49. 1% for Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +460. 8% versus GLBZ's -20. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
42β versus Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 84β — meaning BWFG is approximately -300% more volatile than GLBZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 168% for Glen Burnie Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is pulling ahead at 13.
7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -107. 7% for Glen Burnie Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -0. 7% for Glen Burnie Bancorp — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus -4. 0% for GLBZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLBZ leads at 67. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 1. 5% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).
09Is GLBZ or CZWI or BWFG or NECB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Glen Burnie Bancorp (GLBZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
42), 6. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLBZ: -20. 9%, BWFG: +175. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLBZ and CZWI and BWFG and NECB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GLBZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.