Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GLXG vs HCKT vs KFRC vs KELYA vs TBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
GLXG vs HCKT vs KFRC vs KELYA vs TBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $288M | $790M | $349M | $182M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $297M | $1.33B | $3.09B | $1.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $237K | $14M | $35M | $-266M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 30.1% | 27.2% | 26.3% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 10.5% | 3.8% | -2.8% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 2.8x | 6.9x | 18.0x | 11.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $80M | $70M | $159M | $171M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $18M | $2M | $33M | $25M |
GLXG vs HCKT vs KFRC vs KELYA vs TBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy Payroll Grou… (GLXG) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| The Hackett Group, … (HCKT) | 100 | 43.4 | -56.6% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLXG vs HCKT vs KFRC vs KELYA vs TBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLXG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 61.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 0.50, yield 61.5%, current ratio 0.86x
- Better valuation composite
HCKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KFRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs HCKT's 0.9%
- 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0%
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- 3.1% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- +51.0% vs GLXG's -80.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 61.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KFRC's 3.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.0% vs GLXG's -80.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
GLXG vs HCKT vs KFRC vs KELYA vs TBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLXG vs HCKT vs KFRC vs KELYA vs TBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GLXG leads in 2 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 1 • HCKT leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • TBI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLXG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KELYA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 1264.1x GLXG's $2M. GLXG is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, GLXG holds the edge at +2.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $297M | $1.3B | $3.1B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $318,759 | $35M | $56M | -$54M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $236,887 | $14M | $35M | -$266M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $370,649 | $25M | $43M | $66M | -$60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +30.1% | +27.2% | +26.3% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +10.5% | +3.8% | -2.8% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +4.7% | +2.6% | -8.6% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +8.3% | +3.3% | +2.1% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | -11.6% | +0.1% | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.4% | +54.5% | +2.2% | -2.1% | -37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GLXG and KELYA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.8x trailing earnings, GLXG trades at a 88% valuation discount to HCKT's 24.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLXG's 0.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 160.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $288M | $790M | $349M | $182M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $879,829 | $349M | $858M | $475M | $329M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.80x | 24.28x | 22.05x | -1.34x | -3.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.90x | 17.96x | 10.96x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.08x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.83x | 10.97x | 15.42x | — | 160.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 0.94x | 0.59x | 0.08x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.38x | 4.57x | 6.17x | 0.35x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.31x | 8.87x | 16.88x | 3.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLXG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCKT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLXG scores 6/9 vs TBI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +15.8% | +27.2% | -24.6% | -18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +7.0% | +9.2% | -11.3% | -8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +16.4% | +19.1% | -4.0% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +77.8% | +18.1% | +20.1% | -4.3% | -5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 1.17x | 0.56x | 0.16x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $61M | $68M | $126M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $18M | $2M | $33M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $80M | $70M | $159M | $171M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.35x | 37.81x | — | -12.07x | -46.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFRC five years ago would be worth $8,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $266 for GLXG. Over the past 12 months, TBI leads with a +51.0% total return vs GLXG's -80.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KFRC at -4.8% vs GLXG's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.7% | -41.0% | +39.2% | +13.1% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.4% | -50.3% | +18.9% | -12.2% | +51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -31.0% | -13.8% | -34.2% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -18.8% | -16.8% | -58.3% | -78.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +0.9% | +195.5% | -33.0% | -68.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.1% | -11.6% | -4.8% | -13.0% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GLXG and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLXG is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBI's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs GLXG's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 1.10x | 0.53x | 1.01x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.81 | $26.29 | $47.48 | $14.94 | $7.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $9.48 | $24.49 | $7.98 | $3.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +43.4% | +91.0% | +64.9% | +77.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.7 | 28.9 | 65.6 | 63.7 | 83.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 299K | 305K | 361K | 386K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLXG and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HCKT as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", TBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.7% upside for HCKT (target: $21) vs -4.3% for TBI (target: $6). For income investors, GLXG offers the higher dividend yield at 61.50% vs KELYA's 3.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.50 | $71.00 | $15.00 | $5.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +61.5% | +4.1% | +3.6% | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.71 | $0.47 | $1.55 | $0.31 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +24.0% | +6.4% | +3.5% | +0.6% |
GLXG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KFRC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
GLXG vs HCKT vs KFRC vs KELYA vs TBI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) offers the better valuation at 2. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI?
On trailing P/E, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the cheapest at 2.
8x versus The Hackett Group, Inc. at 24. 3x. On forward P/E, The Hackett Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI?
Over the past 5 years, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) delivered a total return of -16. 8%, compared to -97. 3% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus GLXG's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus TrueBlue, Inc. 's 1. 13β — meaning TBI is approximately 129% more volatile than GLXG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 117% for The Hackett Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCKT leads at 1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI?
Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
3% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLXG leads at 23. 3% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLXG leads at 53. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Hackett Group, Inc.
(HCKT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HCKT: 79. 7% to $20. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI?
In this comparison, GLXG (61.
5% yield), HCKT (4. 1% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), KELYA (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. TBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLXG or HCKT or KFRC or KELYA or TBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, TBI: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLXG and HCKT and KFRC and KELYA and TBI?
These companies operate in different sectors (GLXG (Industrials) and HCKT (Technology) and KFRC (Industrials) and KELYA (Industrials) and TBI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GLXG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GLXG, HCKT, KFRC, KELYA pay a dividend while TBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.