Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GMGI vs ACMR vs DKNG vs ICHR vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
GMGI vs ACMR vs DKNG vs ICHR vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Semiconductors | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $89M | $3.92B | $12.50B | $2.47B | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $190M | $901M | $6.05B | $959M | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-90M | $94M | $4M | $-51M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 56.5% | 44.4% | 41.3% | 11.3% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | -48.8% | 12.1% | -0.2% | -3.8% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 746.0x | 29.7x | 99.1x | 62.2x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $303M | $1.93B | $186M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $766M | $1.60B | $98M | $675M |
GMGI vs ACMR vs DKNG vs ICHR vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Matrix Group… (GMGI) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 279.4 | +179.4% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 60.1 | -39.9% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 209.0 | +109.0% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 231.4 | +131.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GMGI vs ACMR vs DKNG vs ICHR vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GMGI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.76, yield 1.1%
- Beta 1.76, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.59x
- 1.1% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.24, Low D/E 15.7%, current ratio 3.27x
- Lower P/E (29.7x vs 30.4x)
- 10.4% margin vs GMGI's -47.1%
DKNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs MKSI's 9.6%
- Beta 1.12 vs ICHR's 3.93
ICHR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +329.1% vs GMGI's -97.2%
Among these 5 stocks, MKSI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs MKSI's 9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.7x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs GMGI's -47.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs ICHR's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +329.1% vs GMGI's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs GMGI's -55.1%, ROIC 7.0% vs -84.0% |
GMGI vs ACMR vs DKNG vs ICHR vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GMGI vs ACMR vs DKNG vs ICHR vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
GMGI leads 1 • DKNG leads 0 • ICHR leads 0 • MKSI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GMGI and DKNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 31.8x GMGI's $190M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GMGI's -47.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $190M | $901M | $6.1B | $959M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$82M | $126M | $266M | -$11M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$90M | $94M | $4M | -$51M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$69M | $612M | -$17M | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +44.4% | +41.3% | +11.3% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -48.8% | +12.1% | -0.2% | -3.8% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -47.1% | +10.4% | +0.1% | -5.3% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -7.6% | +10.1% | -1.7% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.3% | +9.4% | +42.8% | +4.7% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | -76.1% | +192.9% | +46.2% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GMGI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 37% valuation discount to MKSI's 68.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GMGI's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89M | $3.9B | $12.5B | $2.5B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $98M | $3.5B | $12.8B | $2.6B | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -47.82x | 43.21x | -3113.58x | -46.25x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 746.00x | 29.68x | 99.14x | 62.25x | 30.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.24x | 27.49x | 49.42x | — | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 4.35x | 2.06x | 2.61x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.65x | 2.06x | 19.81x | 3.67x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.12x | — | 19.31x | — | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-102 for GMGI. ACMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -102.1% | +6.1% | +0.5% | -7.5% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -55.1% | +3.9% | +0.1% | -5.2% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -84.0% | +7.0% | -0.9% | -3.9% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.2% | +6.6% | -0.6% | -4.7% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.16x | 3.06x | 0.28x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$463M | $330M | $87M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $766M | $1.6B | $98M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $303M | $1.9B | $186M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.00x | 20.44x | 1.92x | -5.97x | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for GMGI. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs GMGI's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs GMGI's -71.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.1% | +31.9% | -29.3% | +249.0% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | +195.6% | -27.3% | +329.1% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +487.9% | +4.3% | +151.1% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +133.4% | -47.9% | +28.9% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +3065.8% | +157.3% | +629.1% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.4% | +80.5% | +1.4% | +35.9% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DKNG and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DKNG is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs GMGI's 2.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 3.24x | 1.12x | 3.93x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $285.12 | $71.65 | $48.78 | $72.87 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.59 | $19.26 | $20.46 | $13.12 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.6% | +82.6% | +51.7% | +97.7% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.2 | 60.7 | 55.1 | 66.9 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 1.2M | 12.9M | 795K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GMGI and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GMGI as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.2% upside for DKNG (target: $37) vs -75.9% for GMGI (target: $2). For income investors, GMGI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.80 | $40.00 | $36.88 | $49.80 | $272.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 | 48 | 14 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.2% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $0.11 | — | — | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.2% | +6.6% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GMGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
GMGI vs ACMR vs DKNG vs ICHR vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 6% for MKS Inc. (MKSI). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (29. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus MKS Inc. at 68. 8x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -99. 6% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus GMGI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 250% more volatile than DKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 9. 6% for MKS Inc. (MKSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -48. 7% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GMGI leads at 71. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -50. 3% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -52. 6% for GMGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GMGI leads at 56. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) trades at 29. 7x forward P/E versus 746. 0x for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. — 716. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 46. 2% to $36. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI?
In this comparison, GMGI (1.
1% yield), MKSI (0. 3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DKNG, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GMGI or ACMR or DKNG or ICHR or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +157. 3% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKNG: +157. 3%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GMGI and ACMR and DKNG and ICHR and MKSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (GMGI (Technology) and ACMR (Technology) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and ICHR (Technology) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GMGI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. GMGI pays a dividend while ACMR, DKNG, ICHR, MKSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.