GMGI
Golden Matrix Group, Inc.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$89M
5Y Perf.-97.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GMGI vs FLUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$17.28B
5Y Perf.-17.7%
GMGI vs FLUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GMGI | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $89M | $17.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $179M | $17.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-455M |
| Gross Margin | 56.8% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 746.0x | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $13.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $3.83B |
GMGI vs FLUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GMGI
FLUT
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Matrix Group… (GMGI) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 82.3 | -17.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GMGI vs FLUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FLUT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Golden Matrix Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GMGI
Golden Matrix Group, Inc.
The Growth Play
GMGI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 242.1%, EPS growth 60.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- 242.1% revenue growth vs FLUT's 16.6%
- 1.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
The Income Pick
FLUT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.23
- -24.4% 10Y total return vs GMGI's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, current ratio 0.95x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GMGI | 242.1% revenue growth vs FLUT's 16.6% |
| Value | FLUT | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 746.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | FLUT | -2.7% margin vs GMGI's -3.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FLUT | Beta 1.23 vs GMGI's 1.76 |
| Dividends | GMGI | 1.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FLUT | -59.6% vs GMGI's -97.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FLUT | -1.6% ROA vs GMGI's -2.5%, ROIC 4.5% vs 3.1% |
GMGI vs FLUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
GMGI vs FLUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFLUTLAGGINGGMGI
GMGIGolden Matrix Group, …
0leads
FLUTFlutter Entertainment…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GMGIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FLUT6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FLUT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FLUT1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GMGI and FLUT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 95.0x GMGI's $179M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -2.7% (FLUT) to -3.0% (GMGI).
| Metric | GMGIGolden Matrix Gro… | FLUTFlutter Entertain… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $179M | $17.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$455M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15M | $880M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.8% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.3% | -21.7% |
Evenly matched — GMGI and FLUT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GMGI and FLUT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GMGI's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLUT's 10.5x.
| Metric | GMGIGolden Matrix Gro… | FLUTFlutter Entertain… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89M | $17.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $98M | $26.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -47.82x | -57.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 746.00x | 16.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.24x | 10.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.65x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.12x | 16.02x |
Evenly matched — GMGI and FLUT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GMGI and FLUT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLUT delivers a -4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-5 for GMGI. GMGI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLUT's 1.38x.
| Metric | GMGIGolden Matrix Gro… | FLUTFlutter Entertain… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.5% | -4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 1.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | $9.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $3.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.13x | 0.04x |
Evenly matched — GMGI and FLUT each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLUT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLUT five years ago would be worth $4,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for GMGI. Over the past 12 months, FLUT leads with a -59.6% total return vs GMGI's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLUT at -20.6% vs GMGI's -71.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GMGIGolden Matrix Gro… | FLUTFlutter Entertain… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.1% | -54.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | -59.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -50.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -51.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -24.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.4% | -20.6% |
FLUT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLUT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLUT is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GMGI's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLUT currently trades 31.6% from its 52-week high vs GMGI's 2.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GMGIGolden Matrix Gro… | FLUTFlutter Entertain… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $285.12 | $313.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.59 | $97.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.6% | +31.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.2 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 3.4M |
FLUT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FLUT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GMGI as "Buy" and FLUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 129.9% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs -75.9% for GMGI (target: $2). GMGI is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | GMGIGolden Matrix Gro… | FLUTFlutter Entertain… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.80 | $227.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +6.5% |
FLUT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
FLUT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns and Risk & Volatility. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallFlutter Entertainment plc (FLUT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GMGI vs FLUT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GMGI or FLUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Golden Matrix Group, Inc.
(GMGI) is the stronger pick with 242. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 6% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). Analysts rate Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GMGI or FLUT?
Over the past 5 years, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) delivered a total return of -51.
1%, compared to -99. 6% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLUT returned -24. 4% versus GMGI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GMGI or FLUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
23β versus Golden Matrix Group, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GMGI is approximately 43% more volatile than FLUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 138% for Flutter Entertainment plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GMGI or FLUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golden Matrix Group, Inc.
(GMGI) is pulling ahead at 242. 1% versus 16. 6% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Golden Matrix Group, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, GMGI leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GMGI or FLUT?
Golden Matrix Group, Inc.
(GMGI) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 0% net margin versus -1. 9% for Flutter Entertainment plc — meaning it keeps -1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLUT leads at 6. 3% versus 1. 8% for GMGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GMGI leads at 58. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GMGI or FLUT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.
2x forward P/E versus 746. 0x for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. — 729. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 129. 9% to $227. 86.
07Which pays a better dividend — GMGI or FLUT?
In this comparison, GMGI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. FLUT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GMGI or FLUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
23)). Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLUT: -24. 4%, GMGI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GMGI and FLUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GMGI (Technology) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
GMGI pays a dividend while FLUT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GMGI: 15.4% · FLUT: 17.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.