Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GMGI vs PENN vs DKNG vs CZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
GMGI vs PENN vs DKNG vs CZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $89M | $2.24B | $12.50B | $5.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $190M | $6.96B | $6.05B | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-90M | $-843M | $4M | $-485M |
| Gross Margin | 56.5% | 30.6% | 41.3% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | -48.8% | -7.9% | -0.2% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 746.0x | 23.0x | 99.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $23M | $8.38B | $1.93B | $26.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $687M | $1.60B | $887M |
GMGI vs PENN vs DKNG vs CZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Matrix Group… (GMGI) | 100 | 2.4 | -97.6% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 47.7 | -52.3% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 60.1 | -39.9% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 219.9 | +119.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GMGI vs PENN vs DKNG vs CZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GMGI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.76, yield 1.1%
- 1.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
PENN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (23.0x vs 99.1x)
- +6.7% vs GMGI's -97.2%
DKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.03x
- 27.0% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1%
CZR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 302.6% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs CZR's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.0x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs GMGI's -47.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs GMGI's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.7% vs GMGI's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs GMGI's -55.1%, ROIC -0.9% vs -84.0% |
GMGI vs PENN vs DKNG vs CZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GMGI vs PENN vs DKNG vs CZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories
GMGI leads 0 • PENN leads 0 • CZR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CZR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 60.8x GMGI's $190M. DKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GMGI's -47.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $190M | $7.0B | $6.1B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$82M | -$105M | $266M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$90M | -$843M | $4M | -$485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$169M | $612M | $538M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +30.6% | +41.3% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -48.8% | -7.9% | -0.2% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -47.1% | -12.1% | +0.1% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -2.4% | +10.1% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.3% | +8.2% | +42.8% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +37.5% | +192.9% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GMGI and PENN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GMGI's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89M | $2.2B | $12.5B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $98M | $9.9B | $12.8B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -47.82x | -2.88x | -3113.58x | -11.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 746.00x | 22.95x | 99.14x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.24x | 13.81x | 49.42x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 0.32x | 2.06x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.65x | 1.33x | 19.81x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.12x | — | 19.31x | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKNG delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-102 for GMGI. GMGI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CZR's 7.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs GMGI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -102.1% | -34.7% | +0.5% | -12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -55.1% | -5.7% | +0.1% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -84.0% | +1.8% | -0.9% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.2% | +2.0% | -0.6% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 4.58x | 3.06x | 7.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $7.7B | $330M | $25.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $687M | $1.6B | $887M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $8.4B | $1.9B | $26.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.00x | -1.02x | 1.92x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DKNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DKNG five years ago would be worth $5,209 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for GMGI. Over the past 12 months, PENN leads with a +6.7% total return vs GMGI's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKNG at 1.4% vs GMGI's -71.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.1% | +12.9% | -29.3% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | +6.7% | -27.3% | +2.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -35.3% | +4.3% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -80.6% | -47.9% | -73.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +11.9% | +157.3% | +302.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.4% | -13.5% | +1.4% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DKNG and CZR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DKNG is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GMGI's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZR currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs GMGI's 2.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 1.34x | 1.12x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $285.12 | $20.61 | $48.78 | $31.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.59 | $11.65 | $20.46 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.6% | +81.4% | +51.7% | +88.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.2 | 55.1 | 55.1 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 4.4M | 12.9M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GMGI as "Buy", PENN as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", CZR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.2% upside for DKNG (target: $37) vs -75.9% for GMGI (target: $2). GMGI is the only dividend payer here at 1.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.80 | $19.88 | $36.88 | $30.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 47 | 48 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +15.8% | +6.6% | +4.0% |
DKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
GMGI vs PENN vs DKNG vs CZR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GMGI or PENN or DKNG or CZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Analysts rate Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GMGI or PENN or DKNG or CZR?
Over the past 5 years, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) delivered a total return of -47. 9%, compared to -99. 6% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +302. 6% versus GMGI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GMGI or PENN or DKNG or CZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Golden Matrix Group, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GMGI is approximately 57% more volatile than DKNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Golden Matrix Group, Inc. (GMGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 7% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GMGI or PENN or DKNG or CZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 2. 1% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -48. 7% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GMGI leads at 71. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GMGI or PENN or DKNG or CZR?
DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -50. 3% for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -52. 6% for GMGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GMGI leads at 56. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GMGI or PENN or DKNG or CZR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PENN Entertainment, Inc.
(PENN) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 746. 0x for Golden Matrix Group, Inc. — 723. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 46. 2% to $36. 88.
07Which pays a better dividend — GMGI or PENN or DKNG or CZR?
In this comparison, GMGI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. PENN, DKNG, CZR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GMGI or PENN or DKNG or CZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +157. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKNG: +157. 3%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GMGI and PENN and DKNG and CZR?
These companies operate in different sectors (GMGI (Technology) and PENN (Consumer Cyclical) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and CZR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GMGI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GMGI pays a dividend while PENN, DKNG, CZR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.