Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GMHS vs PLTK vs GLBE vs GDEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Specialty Retail
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
GMHS vs PLTK vs GLBE vs GDEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Specialty Retail | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $54M | $1.35B | $5.28B | $295M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $137M | $2.76B | $962M | $412M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-206M | $68M | $52M |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 72.5% | 45.3% | 65.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 1.3% | 7.4% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 7.2x | 29.2x | 3.8x |
| Total Debt | $522K | $2.53B | $42M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $684M | $246M | $111M |
GMHS vs PLTK vs GLBE vs GDEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gamehaus Holdings I… (GMHS) | 100 | 8.8 | -91.2% |
| Playtika Holding Co… (PLTK) | 100 | 51.8 | -48.2% |
| Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| GDEV Inc. (GDEV) | 100 | 87.4 | -12.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GMHS vs PLTK vs GLBE vs GDEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GMHS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PLTK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 11.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
GLBE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- 22.4% 10Y total return vs GDEV's -79.8%
- 27.8% revenue growth vs GMHS's -18.7%
GDEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.47
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 0.68x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 0.68x
- Lower P/E (3.8x vs 29.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.8% revenue growth vs GMHS's -18.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.8x vs 29.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs PLTK's -7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs GLBE's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 11.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.9% vs PLTK's -26.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.7% ROA vs PLTK's -5.5% |
GMHS vs PLTK vs GLBE vs GDEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GMHS vs PLTK vs GLBE vs GDEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GDEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
GLBE leads 1 • GMHS leads 0 • PLTK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDEV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 20.1x GMHS's $137M. GDEV is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLTK's -7.5%. On growth, GLBE holds the edge at +28.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $137M | $2.8B | $962M | $412M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | -$85M | $130M | $74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$206M | $68M | $52M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $531M | $295M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.9% | +72.5% | +45.3% | +65.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +1.3% | +7.4% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -7.5% | +7.1% | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +19.3% | +30.6% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +4.4% | +28.0% | -11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.9% | -17.3% | — | +67.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GMHS and PLTK and GDEV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, GDEV trades at a 85% valuation discount to GLBE's 80.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GDEV's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLBE's 54.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $1.3B | $5.3B | $295M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $3.2B | $5.1B | $186M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.00x | -6.61x | 80.05x | 11.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.23x | 29.20x | 3.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.61x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.85x | — | 54.79x | 3.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 0.49x | 5.49x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | — | 5.89x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.60x | 2.53x | 18.81x | 10.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GMHS and GDEV each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GMHS delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $7 for GLBE. GMHS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLBE's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GDEV scores 7/9 vs PLTK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.9% | — | +7.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | -5.5% | +4.7% | +23.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.8% | -0.2% | +7.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | -0.2% | +7.7% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $1.8B | -$204M | -$110M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $684M | $246M | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $521,581 | $2.5B | $42M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.34x | 17.83x | 583.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLBE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLBE five years ago would be worth $12,243 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $885 for GMHS. Over the past 12 months, GDEV leads with a -0.9% total return vs PLTK's -26.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLBE at -0.1% vs GMHS's -55.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.2% | -10.3% | -17.5% | +9.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.6% | -26.7% | -14.5% | -0.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | -57.0% | -0.4% | -74.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | -83.3% | +22.4% | -80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | -86.2% | +22.4% | -79.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.4% | -24.5% | -0.1% | -36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GMHS and GLBE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GMHS is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLBE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLBE currently trades 72.3% from its 52-week high vs GMHS's 37.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.20x | 1.29x | 1.63x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.66 | $5.52 | $43.21 | $42.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $2.64 | $27.80 | $11.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.6% | +64.7% | +72.3% | +38.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 62.1 | 47.3 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 1.7M | 1.1M | 3K |
Analyst Outlook
GDEV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLTK as "Hold", GLBE as "Buy", GDEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.0% upside for GLBE (target: $43) vs 5.0% for PLTK (target: $4). PLTK is the only dividend payer here at 11.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.75 | $43.40 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +11.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.40 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | +11.2% |
GDEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). GLBE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
GMHS vs PLTK vs GLBE vs GDEV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). GDEV Inc. (GDEV) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV?
On trailing P/E, GDEV Inc.
(GDEV) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 80. 1x. On forward P/E, GDEV Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV?
Over the past 5 years, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) delivered a total return of +22. 4%, compared to -91. 2% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLBE returned +28. 0% versus GMHS's -91. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gamehaus Holdings Inc.
(GMHS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 20β versus Global-e Online Ltd. 's 1. 63β — meaning GLBE is approximately -930% more volatile than GMHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 4% for Global-e Online Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus -18. 7% for Gamehaus Holdings Inc. (GMHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -222. 7% for Playtika Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV?
Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -7. 5% for Playtika Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDEV leads at 9. 6% versus -0. 2% for PLTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTK leads at 72. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GDEV Inc.
(GDEV) trades at 3. 8x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Global-e Online Ltd. — 25. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLBE: 39. 0% to $43. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV?
In this comparison, PLTK (11.
2% yield) pays a dividend. GMHS, GLBE, GDEV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GMHS or PLTK or GLBE or GDEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gamehaus Holdings Inc.
(GMHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 20)). Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GMHS: -91. 2%, GLBE: +28. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GMHS and PLTK and GLBE and GDEV?
These companies operate in different sectors (GMHS (Technology) and PLTK (Technology) and GLBE (Consumer Cyclical) and GDEV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GMHS is a small-cap deep-value stock; PLTK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GLBE is a small-cap high-growth stock; GDEV is a small-cap deep-value stock. PLTK pays a dividend while GMHS, GLBE, GDEV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.